All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Summary
This report presents an overview of the air quality monitoring practice in Europe in recent years. The summary is based on information in questionnaires sent out in 1994 and returned by 24 countries, and other information from national and technical reports for some of those countries and for 6 other countries. Information was received from a total of 30 European countries, all 15 EU Member States inclusive. No information was available from Belarus, Bosnia-Herzegovina, FYROM, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, the Russian Federation, Turkey, Ukraine, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
Based upon monitoring requirements set in EU Directives, the "monitoring practice" is described in terms of coverage (compounds, spatial, temporal, site category), monitoring methods, data availability, data reporting and network/site description.
The information is presented at several levels of aggregation: countrywise network description tables (Appendix B), country summaries (Appendix A), European wide summary tables of monitoring practice (Chapter 3), a basis for the European scale summary description (Chapter 4).
It is acknowledged that the information collected is not complete in all respects for all countries. Only for some countries, comments to the first draft summaries were received (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Portugal, Sweden). The summaries are therefore presented with the reservation that the information may not be complete.
The coverage of air quality monitoring in Europe, in terms of time, space, compounds and site categories is substantial for most of the reporting countries. There are a total of close to 5,000 sites for urban/local monitoring and more than 750 sites for regional monitoring. Hot-spot sites (traffic, industry) is less well represented than are general urban background sites. In a number of countries, lead monitoring seems no longer to be well represented and in some countries ozone is not monitored. Ozone precursors are monitored at one or a few regional sites in 7 countries only.
From the information available for this report, the shortcomings or gaps in the coverage, in terms of complete mapping of areas of high concentrations and exceedances, cannot be judged in detail. Such an evaluation must be carried out by each state.
Table S1 gives the inventorized number of monitoring sites in each country, for various site categories of local and regional sites. Figures S.1 and S.2 shows total number of sites for local and regional monitoring in each country.
Table S.1: Spatial coverage, European AQ monitoring.
LOCAL | REGIONAL | |||||||||
No. of sites |
No. of |
Site class distribution |
No. of |
SO2 +* |
Dep.* |
O3* |
||||
UG* |
UT* |
Ul* |
Rl* |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|||
Austria |
165 |
10 |
100 |
30 |
20 |
15 |
55 |
55 |
35 |
55 |
Belgium |
168 |
60 |
125 |
30 |
13 |
25 |
||||
Denmark |
18 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
17 |
6 |
17 |
3 |
Finland |
120 |
30 |
71 |
18 |
28 |
3 |
22 |
8 |
7 |
9 |
France |
875 |
875 |
21 |
17 |
21 |
|||||
Germany |
467 |
232 |
156 |
79 |
74 |
658) |
578) |
|||
Greece |
31 |
11 |
22 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Ireland |
81 |
15 |
45 |
25 |
10 |
1 |
12 |
7 |
5 |
|
Italy |
1293) |
41 |
129 |
34) |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|||
Luxembourg |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
the Netherlands |
20 |
9 |
7 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
30 |
14 |
26 |
Portugal |
80 |
5 |
6 |
15 |
6 |
53 |
13 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
Spain | 893 |
288 | 438 | 167 |
190 | >7 | ||||
Sweden |
66 |
45 |
63 |
3 |
49 |
12 |
36 |
5 |
||
U.K. |
515) |
34 |
45 |
2 |
4 |
>38 |
38 |
32 |
15 |
|
Iceland |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||
Liechtenstein |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Norway |
6 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
12 |
34 |
15 |
Albania |
23 |
11 |
23 |
|||||||
Bulgaria |
100 |
100 |
||||||||
Croatia |
62 |
8 |
62 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Cyprus | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Czech Republic |
6501) |
|||||||||
Estonia |
16 |
9 |
8 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Hungary |
39 |
39 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||||
Poland |
>540 |
7) |
>500 |
33 |
11 |
|||||
Romania |
152 |
152 |
138 |
4 |
1372 |
4 |
||||
Slovakia |
37 |
17 |
14 |
6 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
4 |
|
Slovenia |
86 |
86 |
4 |
|||||||
Switzerland |
986) |
55 |
31 |
12 |
54 |
|||||
TOTAL |
>4983 |
>818 |
UG - Urban general (in-city
background) site
UT - Urban traffic site
UI - Urban industrial site
RI - Industrial site not in urban area
SO2+ - S and N compounds in air (gases and aerosol)
Dep - Precipitation chemistry
O3 - Ozone
1) Total for urban and regional. Site classification not known.
2) All stations measure pH, conductivity and acidity/alkalinity.14 sites measure
major ions.
3) Not complete. 8) The number of sites may not be quite correct.
4) Only EMEP sites
5) Plus 1100 passive NO2 sampling sites
6) Plus 12 passive SO2 and 102 passive NO2 sites.
7) All cities with >20,000 inhabitants
Czech Republic: The number gives the sum of local and regional monitoring sites.
Figure S.1: Number of sites per country for the monitoring of urban/local/industrial air pollution.
Czech Republic: Sum of local and regional sites. Romania: Stations with only precipitation chem. (137) not included in the number.
Figure S.2: Number of sites per country for the monitoring of regional air pollution (incl. wet deposition).
International monitoring networks are also inventorized: ECE-EMEP, OSPAR, HELCOM, MEDPOL, GEMS/AIR, GAW, TOR, AMAP. Table S2 gives an overview of number and types of sites in these networks. Many stations operate under many of these networks simultaneously.
Table S.2: Summary of recent monitoring
activities in Europe in international programmes.
For all programmes: Not all compounds are measured at all sites.
Programme |
Sites |
Countries |
Compounds (summary) |
EMEP (1995) |
126 |
28 |
S- and N-compounds in air (gases and particles) and precipitation, and O3 and VOC in air. |
OSPAR
(1994) Aerosol/gas |
25 12 |
10 6 |
Cd, Hg, NO3, NH4, (priority) As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn, organo-halogens (grey list) Cd, Hg, a-HCN, g-HCN, HNO3, NO3, NO2, NO, NH3, NH4 (priority) |
HELCOM |
31 |
8 |
N compounds in air
(gases and particles), and in precipitation. Metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn) in airborne particles and in precipitation. Cr, Ni, As, Hg in precipitation. |
MEDPOL |
13 |
10 |
Emphasis on heavy metals in aerosol, and heavy metals and major ions in precipitation. |
GAW |
61 100 42 16 14 |
23 29 19 5 10 |
Precipitation
chemistry. "Trace gases": O3 (81), NOx (43), SO2 (34), CO2 (20), CH4 (7), N2O (3), CFCs (4). Aerosols Radiation Turbidity |
TOR (1994) |
29 |
O3, NO, NO2, NOy, CH4, CO, NMHC, JNO2, met.data. | |
AMAP |
5* |
5 |
Acid.dep., heavy metals, pesticides, PCBs, PAH |
GEMS/AIR (1993/94) |
9 |
9 |
SO2, SPM |
* Only one site, Ny Ålesund at Spitzbergen, in Europe.
As a rule, monitoring data are in most countries not readily available to external users, soon after monitoring. From the available information, Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, U.K., Norway and Cyprus make data from monitors available to external users in near-real-time. This list is probably not complete. In Germany near-real-time data are published on videotext (television) and/or screentext (T-online) several times a day.
Most countries from which we have specific information on this topic, have validated data available in their own data bases within 6 months after measurements. Thus, there should be no problem in principle in making the data available to the EEA within 6 months into the year after.
Reports containing data statistics, summaries, evaluations and assessments are available annually from most countries. Those reports present the air pollution data in various ways, and not always in accordance with the requirements of the EU Directives on parameters/statistics to be reported. This makes comparisons of air quality between countries in Europe problematic.
In many countries, the monitoring system is undergoing substantial modification (e.g. Austria) and extension (e.g. UK). There is a trend towards establishing national centres for on-line data collection (e.g. France, Norway).
Many countries reported the use of dispersion models as part of their air quality surveillance, e.g. Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK. In Norway, the AirQUIS system being established in some cities provides the ability to model urban-scale air quality in near-real time.
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/92-9167-058-8/page002.html or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 08 Dec 2024, 06:55 PM
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others