All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Introduction
Background
An efficient transport system is a vital requirement for economic development and provides personal mobility for activities such as work, education and leisure that are key ingredients of modern life. But transport also contributes significantly to several environmental (and health) problems, particularly climate change, acidification, local air pollution, noise, land take and the disruption of natural habitats. It is a major consumer of fossil fuels (which make up some 99% of the sector. s energy consumption) and other non-renewable resources. Figure 0.1 shows the contribution of the sector to total energy consumption and some important air emissions. Added to this, road traffic accidents continue to be a major cause of death (typically 44 000 a year in the EU alone), injury and material damage. These problems not only constitute an important sustainability concern, but also represent significant economic loss.
Figure 0.1: Contribution of transport
to total energy consumption and air emissions, 1996
Source: EEA/ETC-AE (air emissions) and Eurostat (energy
use)
Until recently, the main instrument used to abate the environmental impacts of transport has been environmental regulation, mainly through the setting of vehicle and fuel-quality standards. However, it has become clear that such . end-of-pipe. approaches (mainly taken by environment ministries) are not sufficient to meet current and probable future international and national environmental targets. What is needed is a change in policy-making to a greater focus on preventative or controlling measures (e.g. road pricing) taken by the sectoral (transport) ministries.
Integration strategies were outlined in the EU. s fifth environmental action programme (5EAP) (CEC, 1992) and have been given a high political priority following the Treaty of Amsterdam, which identifies such strategies as a way to achieve sustainable development. The integration process was given a renewed impetus with the Commission. s 1998 Communication on Integration (CEC, 1998a). However, progress has been slow: a recent report on the environment in the EU shows that the transport sector, which is continuing to grow rapidly, is jeopardising the EU. s ability to achieve many of its environmental policy targets (EEA, 1999a).
The key components of an integrated transport strategy include:
Clearly, such measures are closely interlinked and are most effective when combined in a comprehensive strategy. The action plan of the Common Transport Policy (CTP), which was initiated in 1995, constituted a first step in this direction (CEC, 1995; CEC, 1998b). Its aim is to ensure . sustainable mobility. within the EU, i.e. to encourage the development of efficient and environment-friendly transport systems that are safe and socially acceptable and make less demand on non-renewable resources. It contains some strategies which might in the longer run help to reduce or reverse unfavourable trends, for example fair and efficient pricing, promotion of intermodal and combined transport (i.e. combinations of rail/road/inland waterway/maritime transport using intermodal units), the revitalisation of rail and other less environmentally harmful modes (non-motorised transport, inland waterways, maritime transport), the improvement of public transport and making better use of existing infrastructure. Implementation of these strategies, however, is facing many difficulties, and their impact is not yet reflected in any significant change in transport activity. At the national level, only a few Member States have adopted and implemented integrated transport strategies. The European Council, at its Summit in Cardiff in 1998 (and the subsequent meeting in Vienna, 1998) therefore urged the Commission and the transport ministers to enhance their efforts to develop integrated transport and environment strategies.
A key requirement for this process is a system for regular monitoring and reporting of the effectiveness of integration strategies and progress towards a sustainable transport system. In June 1998, the Joint Transport and Environment Council therefore invited the European Commission and the European Environment Agency to set up an indicator-based Transport and Environment Reporting Mechanism (TERM).
This report, TERM 2000, is the first of a series of regular reports on the transport sector and is likely to set the pattern for similar reports covering other economic sectors. It is based mainly on databases available within Eurostat and the EEA. An important aim has been to inform the Helsinki summit of the Council under the Finnish Presidency on the progress of integration in the transport sector. Though constrained by current data shortcomings, it contains clear messages which can support policy makers in developing further integration strategies.
Another aim is to initiate actions to improve data collection systems, both at EU and Member State level. The report will therefore also be used as a consultation document: it will be widely disseminated to the Member States, thus allowing users and interest groups to contribute additional information and ideas.
TERM process and outputs
The TERM process is expected to develop over a number of years, during which time data, indicators and assessment methods will gradually be improved. It is managed by a Steering Group consisting of the Commission (Transport DG, Environment DG and Eurostat) and the EEA. Its technical implementation is an EEA-Eurostat cooperation.
The key TERM products that are being produced or are envisaged are:
Term 2000 builds on two important technical reports:
Throughout the TERM process, there will be coordination with national initiatives. The Member States are consulted through the Environmental Policy Review Group and the expert group on transport and the environment (established by the Transport and Environment DGs). At the technical level, EEA and Eurostat are using their existing networks to obtain data and information from Member States, the EEA working with its European Information and Observation Network (EIONET), and Eurostat with national statistical offices.
TERM is also being coordinated with other international transport and environment initiatives: the UNECE programme of joint action in the area of transport and the environment, WHO. s follow-up work on transport, environment and health (i.e. implementation of the London 1999 Charter) and the OECD programme on environmentally-sustainable transport and the European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) statistical and environmental activities.
Indicator selection and grouping
At the core of TERM is an ideal list of 31 indicators, which were selected following consultation with various Commission services, national experts, other international organisations and researchers (Table 0.1).
The indicators cover the various elements of the DPSIR analytic framework (Driving forces, Pressures, State of the environment, Impacts, societal Responses), which the EEA uses to show the connections between the causes of environmental problems, their impacts, and society s responses to them, in an integrated way (Figure 0.2). The indicators are grouped according to seven policy areas where integration should take place. Each group should help to answer a key policy question (see Box 0.1).
Box 0.1: Key integration questions and indicator groups |
||
Key questions |
Indicator groups |
|
1 | Is the environmental performance of the transport sector improving? | Group 1: Environmental consequences of transport |
2 | Are we getting better at managing transport growth and improving the modal split? |
Group 2: Transport demand and intensity |
3 |
Are spatial and transport planning becoming better coordinated so as to match transport demand to access needs? |
Group 3: Spatial planning and accessibility |
4 | Are we improving the use of transport infrastructure capacity and moving towards a better-balanced intermodal transport system? |
Group 4: Transport supply |
5 | Are we moving towards a more fair and efficient pricing system, which ensures that external costs are recovered? |
Group 5: Pricing signals |
6 | How rapidly are improved technologies being implemented and how efficiently are vehicles being used? |
Group 6: Technology and utilisation efficiency |
7 | How effectively are environmental management and monitoring tools being used to support policy and decision-making? |
Group 7: Management integration |
The indicator set is still evolving, and to some extent, is a long-term vision of what an ideal indicator list should look like. The current list includes some indicators which cannot as yet be quantified, as a result of data limitations. The indicators that are presented in this first report do not, therefore, always fully match the proposed list. Where data availability has prevented an EU15 analysis, national examples are given, or proxy indicators are used. Future actions to improve data availability are outlined on the individual indicator sheets. Table 0.1 gives an indication of when the final indicators may be achievable and an assessment of the quality of current data. The TERM work programme aims to improve the indicator set and ensure that it is well matched to the needs of users in the Commission and the Member States.
Integration objectives and targets
As TERM aims to assess progress towards integration of environmental considerations into transport policy, indicator trends have been evaluated against a number of . integration. objectives and targets. These were drawn from international policies and plans, such as the 5EAP, the Common Transport Policy, environmental Directives, various other international conventions and agreements, and the OECD. s work on environmentally sustainable transport (OECD, 1996, 1999). Additional national objectives and targets were obtained from a review of national regulations and transport and environmental policy documents and plans.
Most of the targets used in analysing progress have been brought together in the EEA. s STAR (Sustainability Targets And Reference values) database, which can be consulted on http://star.eea.eu.int/ (ERM, 1999b).
Figure 0.2: DPSIR framework for the transport
sector
Assessment
Since the proposed indicators are intended for use mainly by European Community institutions and Member States, a balance had to be sought between EU aggregation and national assessment needs. Evaluation of progress towards integration in terms of the various indicators includes a consideration of both EU and national performance where data availability has made this possible.
The rest of this report is structured as follows:
Table 0.1: Envisaged TERM indicator list (key indicators in blue)
Group |
Indicators |
Position in DPSIR |
When |
Data Quality |
Transport and environment performance |
||||
Environmental consequences of transport |
|
D |
++ |
+ |
|
P |
++ |
+ |
|
|
S |
++ |
+ |
|
|
S and I |
- - |
- - |
|
|
P and S |
- |
- |
|
|
P |
+ |
+ |
|
|
I |
++ |
- |
|
Transport demand and intensity |
|
D |
++ |
- |
|
D |
++ |
+ |
|
Determinants of the transport/environment system |
||||
Spatial planning and Accessibility |
|
D |
- |
- |
|
D |
- |
- |
|
Transport supply |
|
D |
- |
- |
|
D and R |
++ |
+ |
|
Price signals |
|
R |
- |
- |
|
D |
++ |
+ |
|
|
R |
- |
- |
|
|
R |
- |
- |
|
|
D |
+ |
- |
|
|
R |
- |
- |
|
Technology and utilisation efficiency |
|
P/D |
- |
- |
|
P/D |
- |
- |
|
|
D |
- |
- |
|
|
D |
+ |
- |
|
|
D |
++ |
+ |
|
|
D |
- |
+ |
|
|
D |
- |
-- |
|
Management integration |
|
R |
+ |
- |
|
R |
+ |
+ |
|
|
R |
+ |
+ |
|
|
R |
- |
- |
|
|
R |
- |
- |
D = Driver, P = Pressure (environmental), S = State of the environment, I = Impact, R = Response
When: ++ now; + soon, some work needed; - major work needed; - - situation unclear
Quality: ++ complete, reliable, harmonised; + incomplete; - unreliable/unharmonised; - - serious problems
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/ENVISSUENo12/page004.html or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 10 Dec 2024, 09:05 PM
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others