Do something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Indicator Assessment
Aquaculture production in Europe
Europe (EEA39) contributes to approximately 3 % of global aquaculture production, while more than 85 % of all aquaculture products are produced in Asia (Figure 1). European aquaculture (both EEA39 and EU28) is dominated by marine aquaculture. There is a remarkable difference between EEA39, where PISCES Marine aquaculture (~60 %) dominates total aquaculture production, and the EU28, where MOLLUSCA Marine (~50 %), mussels, oysters and clams, play an important role in total production (Figure 2). This is different from Asia, where aquatic production is based on inland fish aquaculture and extractive marine production through shellfish and seaweeds (together > 90 %), and where fed marine aquaculture (fish and crustaceans) represents only 8 % of total production. While the production of aquatic plants is common in Asia, it has been emerging since only 2007 in Europe and the contribution of aquatic plants to total European aquaculture production (both EEA39 and EU28) is currently negligible. Marine fish aquaculture is a fed production type, while shellfish aquaculture is extractive. Therefore, this indicates that pressures on ecosystem are considerably different across countries/areas.
European (EEA39) aquaculture production has been increasing since the early 1990s, mainly because of the expansion of marine production, as freshwater (inland) production levels have not changed significantly (Figure 3). Norwegian salmon production is the main contributor to the growth levels of marine aquaculture production in Europe. Aquaculture production in the EU28 appears to be stagnant, in particular since 1999 when marine production stabilised (Figure 3). Between 2002 and 2015, marine aquaculture increased by 60 % in EEA39, compared with 4 % in the EU28. Inland (freshwater) production also decreased most markedly in the EU28, where it fell by 12 %, compared with an 11 % increase for the EEA39 countries overall.
Aquaculture in Europe (EEA39) is dominated by the production of Atlantic salmon, predominantly in Norway, followed by mussels, sea bream, sea bass, trout and the freshwater species carps, barbels and other cyprinids. In the EU28, the production of mussels is most important, followed by marine salmon, inland trout, oysters and the freshwater species carps, barbels and other cyprinids (Figures 4 and 5).
The countries that contribute the most to European production (EEA39) are Norway (approximately 46 % of total European production), followed by Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Greece (Figure 6). These seven countries account for 90 % of all aquaculture production in Europe. Norway’s production is nearly all due to the farming of Atlantic salmon. Turkish production consists mainly of trout (inland), sea bream and sea bass (marine).
Total marine production as a function of coastline length is a rough indicator of the potential impacts of marine aquaculture that have direct consequences for the surrounding ecosystem. Fish aquaculture may affect the ecosystem, e.g. through organic and chemical loading, while shellfish aquaculture may reduce phytoplankton concentrations with potential effects cascading to higher trophic levels. In 2015, as a function of the available space along the coastline (in tonnes per km (t/km)), the highest production of mollusca was realised in Spain (31 t/km), the Netherlands (30 t/km) and France (21 t/km). The high levels of salmon production in Norway are compensated by the large coastline, and production as a function of coastline length is therefore similar in Norway (25 t/km) and Malta (25 t/km), even though fish production in Malta is only a fraction (< 1 %) of Norway’s total production (Figure 7).
It should be noted that these figures simply relate to marine aquaculture production. The trends do not take into account the pressure exerted by different production systems (intensive, extensive or even closed systems), the introduction of better and more efficient management techniques, or the hydrodynamics and chemical characteristics of the region. They also assume an equal distribution of seafarming practices along the coast, which is often not the case. Local or regional impacts may therefore be more severe than indicated by the figures presented here.
This indicator presents the state of and trends in aquaculture production across Europe, showing in particular:
1. trends in annual aquaculture production by continent to show Europe’s place within the global dimension;
2. the relative importance of aquaculture type (fish, molluscs, aquatic plants) between continents;
3. trends in annual European aquaculture production by major environment type (marine, inland) and culture type (fish, molluscs, aquatic plants);
4. trends in the annual production of major aquaculture species per environment type;
5. aquaculture production by country and per environment type;
6. marine production relative to coastline length as a measure of potential environmental impact.
Production is measured in thousand tonnes or per cent (%) of total production, while marine aquaculture production relative to coastline length is given in thousand tonnes per kilometre.
Over the last 30 years, the EU has introduced many legislative instruments that have led to the implementation of national legislation relevant to the management of the environmental impact of aquaculture. The EU has also introduced environmental provisions to safeguard the environmental protection of the aquatic environment. In the context of marine aquaculture, environmental protection measures have been established at three levels: (1) general policy; (2) specific measures; and (3) regulations that control specific local conditions. More recently, the EU has developed a strategy for its maritime activities in which aquaculture is seen as a strategic sector with high potential for sustainable growth and jobs.
The key EU environmental policies that aim to ensure safe and healthy aquatic environments, on which aquaculture is dependent, are the 2000 Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the 2008 Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The general objective of the WFD is to achieve good ecological status and good chemical status for all surface waters by 2015, including transitional and coastal waters. The MSFD aims to reach or maintain good environmental status of the marine environment by 2020 by adopting an ecosystem approach.
The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), for which the latest reform process took place between 2009 and 2013, is set to ensure that the exploitation of living aquatic resources provides sustainable economic, environmental and social conditions. For this purpose, the EU shall apply a precautionary approach in taking measures designed to protect and conserve living aquatic resources, to provide for their sustainable exploitation and to minimise the impact of fishing activities on marine ecosystems. The new CFP entered into force in 2014 (Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013) and it aims to ensure that 'fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long-term and are managed in a way that is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, social and employment benefits, and of contributing to the availability of food supplies'.
The new CFP builds on the process initiated in 2002 with the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture (COM(2002) 511), which set out policy directions to promote the growth of aquaculture. In 2009, the European Commission published a communication to give new impetus for building a sustainable future for aquaculture by establishing conditions and ensuring compatibility between aquaculture and the environment (COM(2009) 162). This new strategy had three key elements:
In 2013, the Commission adopted strategic guidelines for the sustainable development of EU aquaculture (COM(2013) 229 final) where four priority areas were identified in consultation with all relevant stakeholders:
On the basis of these guidelines, the Commission and EU Member States will collaborate to help increase the sector's production and competitiveness under a new governance scheme. Using these guidelines, Member States have developed or are now developing multiannual national plans (MANPs) for the development of sustainable aquaculture. These MANPs outline how each Member State intends to foster growth in the aquaculture industry.
Aquaculture has been identified as one of five value chains that can deliver sustainable growth and jobs in the EU's Blue Growth Strategy (COM(2012) 494 final). In addition, in July 2014, the European Parliament and the Council adopted legislation to create a common framework for maritime spatial planning in Europe (Directive 2014/89/EU). Aquaculture is considered one of the sectors that Member States will have to include in these plans in a way that responds to the sector's needs and minimises its impacts on the environment and other human activities.
Information on the structure of the aquaculture sector and on the technologies employed is required to ensure that an environmentally sound industry is developed. Regulation (EC) No 762/2008 was established to provide detail on the statistics about the industry required and covers: (1) the annual production (volume and unit value) of aquaculture; (2) the annual input (volume and unit value) to capture-based aquaculture; (3) the annual production of hatcheries and nurseries; and (4) the structure of the aquaculture sector.
Furthermore, there is an increasing need to control the introduction of species and develop strategies to minimise or mitigate the impacts of alien species in the aquaculture sector, as described under Council Regulation (EC) No 708/2007 concerning the use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture. This regulation outlines a proposal for the regulation of alien and locally absent species by establishing a new system for the assessment and management of the risks associated with the introduction of new organisms for aquaculture. Regulation (EC) No 535/2008, which lays down detailed rules for the implementation of (EC) No 708/2007, and Regulation (EU) No 304/2011, which amends Council Regulation (EC) No 708/2007, also play a role in species introduction control and impact mitigation.
The EC directives affecting the marketing of veterinary medicinal products also regulate aquaculture procedures. These EC directives and related regulations pertaining to the marketing of veterinary medicinal products establish maximum residue limits (MRLs) and marketing authorisations (MAs) for chemicals administered to fish.
Linked to legislative and regulatory measures, institutional measures such as codes of contact and codes of practice have been and are being established at international (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), national and aquaculture producers' association levels (Federation of European Aquaculture Producers (FEAP)) as mechanisms of self-regulation. The FEAP Code of Conduct for European Aquaculture was agreed in 2000 and contributed to the development of national codes of practice by many European aquaculture associations and was incorporated into the European Code of Sustainable and Responsible Fisheries Practices. This was adopted by the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture in 2003 (EC, 2004). International conventions also directly address the environmental impact of marine aquaculture. These conventions are the OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic; the Helsinki Convention (HELCOM) for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area; and The Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution. The most important outcome from the OSPAR system is known as PARCOM.
No specific targets exist for aquaculture. Its development should however be in line with the objectives of the WFD to reach good ecological and chemical status of all surface waters by 2015, and those of the MSFD to reach good environmental status of the marine environment by 2020.
To stimulate aquatic production, EU Member States prepared national strategies for ambitious growth, aiming to produce an extra 300 000 tonnes by 2020, i.e. an increase of 25 % (Summary of the 27 Multiannual National Aquaculture Plans, European Union, 2016).
Data for aquaculture production (tonnes produced per year) are retrieved from the FAO's FISHSTAT (Fisheries Statistical Collection: Aquaculture Production, Global Aquaculture Production), based on specific queries for country, fishing area, environment, species and time. The environment type (i.e. marine or inland), species or species group, and production type (i.e. finfish, molluscs or aquatic plants) are the categories used by the FAO.
The analysis covers the EU-28 and non-EU countries that are part of the EEA Eionet network for which production data exist. It has been aggregated at the level of the EU-28 or 'all countries' (i.e. EU-28 plus EEA member countries) and the data are presented by either country groupings or individual countries, by environment, by type of production or a combination of these.
Not applicable.
No methodology references available.
The same species can be reported under different environments.
No uncertainty has been specified
The pressure that aquaculture exerts on the environment remains difficult to quantify at the EU level in the form, and in accordance with, the standards required for indicator development. Unfortunately, while there are information and statistics on production levels, there is no information on the rates of nutrient and chemical discharge, or the number of escapees that is necessary to assess genetic pollution, the incidence of disease or even the food conversion ratio, which could be used as potential indicators.
Therefore, production acts as a useful, but coarse, indicator of the pressures resulting from aquaculture, but variations in culture species, production systems and management approaches mean that the relationship between production and pressure is non-uniform.
By presenting production relative to coastline length, it is possible to determine a more comparable value of production density. This is potentially a better indicator of pressure than a single production value, but there are difficulties with this indicator: it is inappropriate for landlocked countries; it does not apply to freshwater production; it does not consider the area of coastline that is potentially suitable for production; it does not account for the aggregation of production in certain areas; and the determination of coastline length is problematic and relies upon a uniform scale being used for each country's determination.
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-production-4/assessment or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 25 Apr 2024, 12:31 AM
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others