Species of European interest

Indicator Assessment

Prod-ID: IND-27-en

Also known as: SEBI 003 , CSI 007

expired Created 10 Sep 2009 Published 21 May 2010 Last modified 25 Aug 2017

6 min read

This is an old version, kept for reference only.

Go to latest version

Topics: Biodiversity — Ecosystems ,

This page was archived on 25 Aug 2017 with reason: A new version has been published

Around half of the species of Community interest (those species which, within the territory of the European Union are listed in Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive) have an unfavourable conservation status, with variation across biogeographic regions (1) . There are still significant gaps in knowledge, especially for marine species. (1) The reporting format uses three classes of Conservation Status. 'Good' (green) signifies that the species or habitat is at Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) as defined in the Directive and the habitat or species can be expected to prosper without any change to existing management or policies. In addition, two classes of 'Unfavourable' are recognised: 'Unfavourable-Bad' (red) signifies that the habitat or species is in serious danger of becoming extinct (at least locally) and 'Unfavourable-Inadequate' (amber) is used for situations where a change in management or policy is required but the danger of extinction is not so high. The unfavourable category has been split into two classes to allow improvements or deterioration to be reported. (Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines DRAFT 2 January 2006).

Key messages

Around half of the species of Community interest (those species which, within the territory of the European Union are listed in Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive) have an unfavourable conservation status, with variation across biogeographic regions^₍₁₎.
There are still significant gaps in knowledge, especially for marine species.
^₍₁₎^{_{The reporting format uses three classes of Conservation Status. 'Good' (green) signifies that the species or habitat is at Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) as defined in the Directive and the habitat or species can be expected to prosper without any change to existing management or policies. In addition, two classes of 'Unfavourable' are recognised: 'Unfavourable-Bad' (red) signifies that the habitat or species is in serious danger of becoming extinct (at least locally) and 'Unfavourable-Inadequate' (amber) is used for situations where a change in management or policy is required but the danger of extinction is not so high. The unfavourable category has been split into two classes to allow improvements or deterioration to be reported. (Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines DRAFT 2 January 2006).}}

What is the conservation status of species of Community interest?

Conservation status, species by taxonomic group

Chart

Data sources:

Conservation status of habitat types and species (Article 17, Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC) provided by European Environment Agency (EEA)

Explore chart interactively

Table

Data sources:

Conservation status of habitat types and species (Article 17, Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC) provided by European Environment Agency (EEA)

Explore chart interactively

Species of European interest — conservation status by biogeographical region

Note: In the Alpine region, more than 25 % of species have a 'favourable' status and more than 20 % have an 'unfavourable' or 'bad' status.

Data source:

Conservation status of habitat types and species (Article 17, Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC) provided by European Environment Agency (EEA)

Downloads and more info

Unfavourable status is most frequently reported for the species in the marine Baltic region and the continental region (100 and 70 %, respectively).
The variation amongst species groups is limited, but amphibians appear to be most threatened, with nearly 70 % having an unfavourable conservation status. In most cases, the trend information was not available. For many species, recovery to a favourable conservation status will take considerable time. The next evaluation, due in 2013, will help assess the efficiency of the Directive.

NOTES

Figure 1 and Map 1 are based on assessments of species as listed in Annexes II, IV and V of the Directive. Member States are required to assess each species in each biogeographical zone in which it exists in the country. A regional assessment has been calculated based on the Member State assessments.

FURTHER INFORMATION

About species of European interest: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/index_en.htm.
About biogeographical regions: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/sites_hab/biogeog_regions/index_en.htm.
About conservation status assessment: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/rep_habitats/index_en.htm#csa.
http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library?l=/habitats_reporting/reporting_2001-2007/internet_consultation/draft_consultation/_EN_1.0_&a=d

Indicator specification and metadata

Indicator definition

The indicator shows changes in the conservation status of species of European interest.
It is currently based on data collected under the obligations for monitoring under Article 11 of the EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC).

Units

Units used in figures: %

Rationale

Justification for indicator selection

MAIN ADVANTAGES OF THE INDICATOR

Policy relevance. The indicator directly indicates the implementation and success of the Habitats Directive. Therefore, it is highly relevant for Member States and EU nature conservation policy. Results are representative for the EU Member States and can be aggregated to the EU level.
The data will be regularly collected by Member States (Article 17 Reporting Obligation).
The underlying data is expected to be published by the Commission and thus easily accessible.
Hardly any extra costs will be involved. The resources necessary for data collection and processing are significant but have to be spent under the obligations of Article 11 of the Habitats Directive.

Scientific references

No rationale references available

Policy context and targets

Context description

The indicator covers the species which are considered to be of European interest (listed in Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive). This set of species was chosen to be on the annexes of the Directive because they were perceived to be under some sort of threat at an EU scale. The species set covers various taxonomic groups, trophic levels and habitats.

Indicator trends should primarily be influenced by the implementation of measures under the Habitats Directive, such as the establishment of the Natura 2000 network and the species protection measures. Therefore the indicator assesses the success of the Habitats Directive, one of the main legislative pillars of EU nature conservation policy.

NB. At present the proposals for this indicator are restricted to the non-avian species listed on Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive. In the longer term, subject to discussions between Member States and the European Commission (e.g. through the Ornis Committee), on reporting under Article 12 of the Birds Directive, it may be possible to include avian species within the indicator.

Relation of the indicator to the focal area

The indicator is directly related to the CBD Focal area 'Status and trends of components of biological biodiversity'. It refers to the status of species (conservation status as defined in Article 1 of the Habitats Directive) and trends in the status over time.

Targets

No targets have been specified

Methodology

Methodology for indicator calculation

EU Member States have to monitor and report the conservation status (CS) of species of European interest (Annexes II, IV, V of the Directive). The conservation status is illustrated in three 'traffic light' categories ('favourable' - green, 'unfavourable inadequate' - amber, 'unfavourable bad' - red, plus unknown) characterised by four parameters:

trends and status of range,
trends and status of the overall population,
quality and extent of the habitat,
future prospects.

The indicator is based on the number of species in the three CS categories and changes between categories in time.

Further about conservation status assessment:

http://biodiversity.eionet.europa.eu/article17

http://biodiversity.eionet.europa.eu/article17/Art%2017_consultation_notes.pdf

Methodology for gap filling

No methodology for gap filling has been specified. Probably this info has been added together with indicator calculation.

Methodology references

No methodology references available.

Uncertainties

Methodology uncertainty

No uncertainty has been specified

Data sets uncertainty

No uncertainty has been specified

Rationale uncertainty

MAIN DISADVANTAGES OF THE INDICATOR

Limited trend information: the underlying data is not yet available and only one data set will become available before 2010. The data will only be reported in a six-year cycle.
The indicator is based on the EU Habitats Directive; a transfer to the global/ pan-European level is not possible.
There are no EU wide standards for data collection. The robustness of the indicator could therefore be limited.

Data sources

Conservation status of habitat types and species (Article 17, Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC)
provided by Directorate-General for Environment (DG ENV) , European Environment Agency (EEA)

Generic metadata

Topics:

Biodiversity — Ecosystems

Tags:

biogeographical regions , conservation , species , biodiversity

DPSIR: State
Typology: Descriptive indicator (Type A - What is happening to the environment and to humans?)

Indicator codes

SEBI 003
CSI 007

Temporal coverage:

2008

Geographic coverage:

Countries

Austria , Belgium , Bulgaria , Cyprus , Czech Republic , Denmark , Estonia , Finland , France , Germany , Greece , Hungary , Ireland , Italy , Latvia , Lithuania , Luxembourg , Malta , Netherlands , Poland , Portugal , Romania , Slovakia , Slovenia , Spain , Sweden , United Kingdom

Contacts and ownership

EEA Contact Info

Katarzyna Biala

Ownership

European Environment Agency (EEA)

Dates

First draft created:

10 Sep 2009, 03:26 PM

Publish date:

21 May 2010, 12:00 AM

Last modified:

25 Aug 2017, 11:49 AM

Frequency of updates

Updates are scheduled every 6 years

Permalinks

Permalink to this version: e4a7a69eed5595c63fade216856f7a2c
Permalink to latest version: IND-27-en

Older versions

08 Nov 2005 - Threatened and protected species

Document Actions

For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-of-european-interest/species-of-european-interest-assessment or scan the QR code.

PDF generated on 17 Jul 2018, 02:50 PM

Write to us

Call us

Sections