Municipal waste landfilling rates in 32 European countries, 2001 and 2010

Figure Created 19 Feb 2013 Published 19 Mar 2013 Last modified 06 Jun 2013

Topics: Resource efficiency and waste ,

Percentage of municipal waste landfilled in each European country, 2001 and 2010

https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/municipal-waste-landfilling-rates-in/municipal-waste-landfilling-rates-in/image_large

Download

Documents

Microsoft Excel (Office 2010)
85.96 KB

Municipal waste landfilling rates in 32 European countries, 2001 and 2010 - Excel file

Metadata

Last upload:

19 Feb 2013

Temporal coverage:

2001-2010

Tags:

Geographic coverage:

Austria , Belgium , Bulgaria , Croatia , Cyprus , Czech Republic , Denmark , Estonia , Europe , Finland , France , Germany , Greece , Hungary , Iceland , Ireland , Italy , Latvia , Lithuania , Luxembourg , Malta , Netherlands , Norway , Poland , Portugal , Romania , Slovakia , Slovenia , Spain , Sweden , Switzerland , Turkey , United Kingdom

Methodology:

The amounts of municipal waste reported as landfilled ('deposited onto or into land') have been divided by the amounts of municipal waste generated by country, and converted into percentages. Data for Austria has been corrected according to information received from the Austrian Umweltbundesamt.

Units:

Percentage

Rights:

EEA standard re-use policy: unless otherwise indicated, re-use of content on the EEA website for commercial or non-commercial purposes is permitted free of charge, provided that the source is acknowledged (http://www.eea.europa.eu/legal/copyright). Copyright holder: Copenhagen Resource Institute (CRI).

Owners:

Copenhagen Resource Institute (CRI)

Figure type:

Graph

Additional information

Notes: The further from the centre in the radar chart, the worse the waste management. Countries are ranked from the highest landfilling rate in 2010 to the lowest. The landfilling rate is calculated as a % of MSW landfilled per MSW generated. According to Eurostat the comparability of the data over time is high. However, some breaks in the time series are documented, which can influence the comparability between countries and within a country. Generally, the quality of the data seems to better in the end of the period between 2001 and 2010 than in the beginning.