Bio-waste recycling as a percentage of municipal waste generation in 32 European countries, 2001 and 2010

Figure Created 19 Feb 2013 Published 19 Mar 2013 Last modified 06 Jun 2013

Topics: Resource efficiency and waste ,

Bio-waste recycling in 32 European countries as a percentage of total municipal waste generated in 2001 and 2010

https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/bio-waste-recycling-as-a/bio-waste-recycling-as-a/image_large

Download

Documents

Microsoft Excel (Office 2010)
54.92 KB

Bio-waste recycling as a percentage of municipal waste generation in 32 European countries, 2001 and 2010 - Excel file

Metadata

Last upload:

19 Feb 2013

Temporal coverage:

2001-2010

Tags:

Geographic coverage:

Austria , Belgium , Bulgaria , Croatia , Cyprus , Czech Republic , Denmark , Estonia , Europe , Finland , France , Germany , Greece , Hungary , Iceland , Ireland , Italy , Latvia , Lithuania , Luxembourg , Malta , Netherlands , Norway , Poland , Portugal , Romania , Slovakia , Slovenia , Spain , Sweden , Switzerland , Turkey , United Kingdom

Methodology:

The amounts of municipal waste reported as 'other recycling (including composting) has been divided by the amounts of municipal waste generated by country.

Units:

Percentage

Rights:

EEA standard re-use policy: unless otherwise indicated, re-use of content on the EEA website for commercial or non-commercial purposes is permitted free of charge, provided that the source is acknowledged (http://www.eea.europa.eu/legal/copyright). Copyright holder: Copenhagen Resource Institute (CRI).

Owners:

Copenhagen Resource Institute (CRI)

Figure type:

Graph

Additional information

Notes: The further from the radar chart’s centre, the better the waste management. The bio-waste recycling rate is calculated as percentage of recycled bio-waste per MSW generated. According to Eurostat the comparability of the data over time is high. However, some breaks in the time series are documented, which can influence the comparability between countries and within a country. Generally, the quality of the data seems to better in the end of the period between 2001 and 2010 than in the beginning. For Iceland is used 2008 data for 2010. For Slovenia 2002 data are used for 2001 and 2009 data are used for 2010. Croatia is not included for 2001