Absolute differences between the observed and the predicted values of seff according to the pan-European model
Metadata
-
Last upload:
- 23 Sep 2011
-
Temporal coverage:
- 2009
-
Tags:
- fragmentation report 2011 , fragmentation , landscape , density
-
Geographic coverage:
-
Rights:
- EEA standard re-use policy: unless otherwise indicated, re-use of content on the EEA website for commercial or non-commercial purposes is permitted free of charge, provided that the source is acknowledged (http://www.eea.europa.eu/legal/copyright). Copyright holder: European Environment Agency (EEA).
-
Owners:
- European Environment Agency (EEA)
-
Processors:
- Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)
-
Figure type:
- Map
Additional information
The objective of this task is calculate “effective mesh size” as indicator of landscape fragmentation. Effective mesh size (Meff) is proportional to the probability of two points chosen randomly in region being connected. This probability is then converted into the size of a patch – the effective mesh size. The unit of Meff is that of area (e.g. Ha). This area corresponds to the size of “meshes” of regular network that has the same degree of fragmentation and it can be compared with the values of Meff from other regions. The smaller the effective mesh size, the more fragmented the landscape.
Related content
Used in publications
Permalinks
- Permalink to this version
- 13cbd511a51fc504aabd02b0d3b26f47
- Permalink to latest version
- O3QXDFJ2WR
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/absolute-differences-between-the-observed or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 17 Aug 2017, 09:22 PM
Document Actions
Share with others