code specification_name specification last_assessment key_question key_message
APE001 Sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions (APE 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-sulphur-dioxide-so2-emissions-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-sulphur-dioxide-so2-emissions-1/assessment-3 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of SO2?
  • EEA-33 emissions of sulphur oxides (SOX) have decreased by 74% between 1990 and 2011. In 2011, the most significant sectoral source of SOX emissions was 'Energy production and distribution' (58% of total emissions), followed by emissions occurring from 'Energy use in industry' (20%) and in the 'Commercial, institutional and households' (15%) sector.
  • The reduction in emissions since 1990 has been achieved as a result of a combination of measures, including fuel-switching in energy-related sectors away from high-sulphur solid and liquid fuels to low-sulphur fuels such as natural gas, the fitting of flue gas desulphurisation abatement technology in industrial facilities and the impact of European Union directives relating to the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels.
  • All of the EU-28 Member States have reduced their national SOX emissions below the level of the 2010 emission ceilings set in the National Emission Ceilings Directive (NECD)[1]. Emissions in 2011 for the three EEA countries having emission ceilings set under the UNECE/CLRTAP Gothenburg protocol (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) were also below the level of their respective 2010 ceilings.
  • Environmental context: Typically, sulphur dioxide is emitted when fuels or other materials containing sulphur are combusted or oxidised. It is a pollutant that contributes to acid deposition, which, in turn, can lead to changes in soil and water quality. The subsequent impacts of acid deposition can be significant, including adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems in rivers and lakes and damage to forests, crops and other vegetation. SO2 emissions also aggravate asthma conditions and can reduce lung function and inflame the respiratory tract. They also contribute, as a secondary particulate pollutant, to the formation of particulate matter in the atmosphere, an important air pollutant in terms of its adverse impact on human health. Furthermore, the formation of sulphate particles in the atmosphere following the release of SO2 results in reflection of solar radiation, which leads to net cooling of the atmosphere.

[1] Emissions data reported by EU Member States under NECD is used for comparison with NECD ceilings, and data reported under CLRTAP is used for all other calculations unless otherwise stated.

APE002 Nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions (APE 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-nitrogen-oxides-nox-emissions-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-nitrogen-oxides-nox-emissions-1/assessment.2010-08-19.0140149032-3 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of NOx?
    • EEA-33 emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) decreased by 44% between 1990 and 2011. In 2011, the most significant sources of NOX emissions were 'Road transport' (41%), 'Energy production and distribution' (23%) and the 'Commercial, institutional and households' (13%) sectors.
    • The largest reduction of emissions in absolute terms since 1990 has occurred in the road transport sector, from which emissions in the EEA-33 have fallen 48% since 1990; in all years since 1990, emissions in this sector have fallen compared with the previous year, by an average of 3% per year. This reduction has been achieved despite the general increase in activity within this sector since the early 1990s and has primarily been achieved as a result of fitting three-way catalysts to petrol fuelled vehicles. However, ambient urban concentrations of NO2 in EU-28 countries in recent years have not fallen by as much as reported emissions and a number of Member States' NOX emissions could therefore be systematically higher than currently calculated.
    • In the electricity/energy production sector, reductions have occurred as a result of measures such as the introduction of combustion modification technologies (e.g. the use of low NOX burners, which reduce formation of NOX in combustion), the implementation of flue-gas abatement techniques (e.g. NOX scrubbers and selective catalytic and non-catalytic reduction techniques - SCR and SNCR) and fuel-switching from coal to gas (which has significantly lower NOX emissions per unit energy).
    • The National Emission Ceilings Directive (NECD) specifies NOX emission ceilings for Member States that must have been met by 2010. In general, the newer EU Member States have made substantially better progress against their respective NOX ceilings than the older Member States of the EU-15. Twelve of the EU-13 Member States had reduced their emissions beyond what is required under the NECD[1] by 2010, and by 2011 all had met their targets. In contrast, only five EU-15 Member States reported 2010 emissions within their respective national ceilings and by 2011 this had increased to just eight. Of the three non-EU countries having emission ceilings set under the UNECE/CLRTAP Gothenburg protocol, only Switzerland reported 2011 emissions below the level of their 2010 ceiling.
    • Environmental context: NOX contributes to acid deposition and eutrophication of soil and water. The subsequent impacts of acid deposition can be significant, including adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems in rivers and lakes and damage to forests, crops and other vegetation. Eutrophication can lead to severe reductions in water quality with subsequent impacts including decreased biodiversity, changes in species composition and dominance, and toxicity effects. NO2 is associated with adverse effects on human health, as at high concentrations it can cause inflammation of the airways and reduced lung function, increasing susceptibility to respiratory infection. It also contributes to the formation of secondary particulate aerosols and tropospheric ozone in the atmosphere, both of which are important air pollutants due to their adverse impacts on human health and other climate effects.

 

[1] Emissions data reported by EU member states under NECD is used for comparison with NECD ceilings, while data reported under CLRTAP is used for all other calculations unless otherwise stated.

APE003 Ammonia (NH3) emissions (APE 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-ammonia-nh3-emissions-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-ammonia-nh3-emissions-1/assessment-4 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of NH3?
  • EEA-33 emissions of NH3 have declined by 25% between the years 1990 and 2011. Agriculture was responsible for 94% of NH3 emissions in 2011.
  • The reduction in emissions within the agricultural sector is primarily due to a reduction in livestock numbers (especially cattle) since 1990, changes in the handling and management of organic manures and from the decreased use of nitrogenous fertilisers. The reductions achieved in the agricultural sector have been marginally offset by the increase in annual emissions over this period in the road-transport sector, and to a lesser extent, the 'Solvent and product use' and 'Non-road transport' sectors.
  • All but three of the EU-28 Member States reported 2011 national NH3 emissions that meet the continuing obligation to stay below the 2010 emission ceilings set in the National Emission Ceilings Directive (NECD)[1]. Emissions in 2011 for one of the three non-EU countries having emission ceilings set under the UNECE/CLRTAP Gothenburg protocol (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) were also below the level of the respective 2010 ceilings. In 2010 emissions of NH3 in Denmark and Germany were slightly (less than 1%) above their ceiling; in Denmark these have now reduced below their ceiling, however, in Germany they have risen a further 2%.
  • Environmental context: NH3 contributes to acid deposition and eutrophication. The subsequent impacts of acid deposition can be significant, including adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems in rivers and lakes, and damage to forests, crops and other vegetation. Eutrophication can lead to severe reductions in water quality with subsequent impacts including decreased biodiversity, changes in species composition and dominance, and toxicity effects. NH3 also contributes to the formation of secondary particulate aerosols, an important air pollutant due to its adverse impacts on human health.

[1] Emissions data reported by EU Member States under NECD is used for comparison with NECD ceilings, and data reported under CLRTAP is used for all other calculations unless otherwise stated.

APE005 Heavy metal emissions (APE 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea32-heavy-metal-hm-emissions-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea32-heavy-metal-hm-emissions-1/assessment-4 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of heavy metals?
  • Across the EEA-33 countries, emissions of lead decreased by 89%, mercury by 66% and cadmium by 64% between 1990 and 2012.
  • Emissions from the road transport sector have decreased by nearly 98%. Nevertheless, the road transport sector still remains an important source of lead, contributing around 12% of total lead emissions in the EEA-33 region. However, since 2004, little progress has been made in reducing emissions further; 97.9% of the total reduction from 1990 emissions of lead had been achieved by 2004.
APE006 Persistent organic pollutant emissions (APE 006) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea32-persistent-organic-pollutant-pop-emissions-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea32-persistent-organic-pollutant-pop-emissions-1/assessment-4 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of persistent organic pollutants?
  • Emissions of a number of compounds categorised as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) - e.g. hexachlorobenzene (HCB, by 92%), hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH, by 85%), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, by 75%), dioxins & furans (by 83%), and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs, by 61%) - decreased between 1990 and 2012 in the EEA-33 countries. While the majority of countries report that POPs emissions fell during this period, a number report that increased emissions occurred.
  • In 2012, the most significant sources of emissions for these POPs included ‘Commercial, institutional and households’ (10% of HCB, 32% of dioxins and furans, 16% of PCBs) and ‘Industrial processes’ (70% of HCB, 32% of HCH, 27% of PCBs) sectors.
APE008 Emissions of ozone precursors (CSI 002/APE 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-ozone-precursors-version-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-ozone-precursors-version-2/assessment-4 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of ozone precursors across Europe?
  • Emissions of the main ground-level ozone precursor pollutants have decreased across the EEA-33 region between 1990 and 2011; nitrogen oxides (NOX) by 44%, non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) by 57%, carbon monoxide (CO) by 61%, and methane (CH4) by 29%.
  • This decrease has been achieved mainly as a result of the introduction of catalytic converters for vehicles, which has significantly reduced emissions of NOX and CO from the road transport sector, the main source of ozone precursor emissions.
  • The EU-28 as a whole reported 2011 emissions at 4% below the 2010 NECD ceiling for NOX, one of the two ozone precursors (NOX and NMVOC) for which emission limits exist under the EU's NEC Directive (NECD). Total NMVOC emissions in the EU-28 were 22% below the 2010 NECD limit in 2011, however, seven of individual Member States did not meet their ceilings for one or both of these two pollutants.
  • Of the three non-EU countries having emission ceilings for 2010 set under the UNECE/CLRTAP Gothenburg protocol (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland), all reported NMVOC emissions in 2011 that were lower than their respective ceilings, however Liechtenstein and Norway reported 2011 NOX emissions higher than their ceiling for 2010.
APE009 Emissions of primary PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter (CSI 003/APE 009) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-primary-particles-and-5 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-primary-particles-and-5/assessment-3 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of primary PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter ?
  • Total emissions of primary sub-10µm particulate matter (PM10) have reduced by 24% across the EEA-33 region between 1990 and 2011, driven by a 35% reduction in emissions of the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) fraction. Emissions of particulates between 2.5 and 10 µm have reduced by 12% over the same period; the difference of this trend to that of PM2.5 is due to significantly increased emissions in the 2.5 to 10 µm fraction from 'Road transport' and 'Agriculture' (of 20% and 6% respectively) since 1990.
  • Of this reduction in PM10 emissions, % has taken place in the 'Energy Production and Distribution' sector due to factors including the fuel-switching from coal to natural gas for electricity generation and improvements in the performance of pollution abatement equipment installed at industrial facilities.
APE010 Emissions of the main air pollutants in Europe (CSI 040/APE 010) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/main-anthropogenic-air-pollutant-emissions http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/main-anthropogenic-air-pollutant-emissions/assessment What progress is being made in reducing emissions of the main air pollutants across Europe?
  • Anthropogenic emissions of the main air pollutants decreased significantly in most EEA-33 member countries between 1990 and 2012:
    • Nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions decreased by 46% (51% in the EU-28);
    • Sulphur oxides (SOX) emissions decreased by 75% (84% in the EU-28);
    • Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) emissions decreased by 56% (60% in the EU-28);
    • Ammonia (NH3) emissions decreased by 24% (28% in the EU-28); and
    • Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions decreased by 35% (35% in the EU-28).
  • The EU-28 as a whole did not meet its 2010 target to reduce emissions of NOX. A further reduction of 2.2% from the 2010 emissions level is required to meet the interim environmental objectives set in the European Union’s 2001 National Emission Ceiling Directive (NECD).
  • The EU-28 met its continuing obligation to maintain emissions of SOX, NH3 and NMVOC below legally binding targets as specified by the NECD. A number of EU Member States reported emissions above their NECD emission ceilings: nine for NOX, three for NH3, and one for NMVOCs. There are no emission ceilings for primary PM2.5.
  • Three additional EEA member countries have emission ceilings for 2010 set in the Gothenburg Protocol under the 1979 UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland). All three countries met the SOx ceiling. Switzerland also met the ceilings for the other three pollutants. Liechtenstein exceeded the NMVOC ceiling. Norway breached two ceilings, for NH3 and for NOx.
CLIM002 Mean precipitation (CLIM 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/european-precipitation-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/european-precipitation-1/assessment-1 What is the trend in precipitation across Europe?
  • Precipitation trends since 1960 show an increase by up to 70 mm per decade in north-eastern and north-western Europe, in particular in winter, and a decrease by up to 90 mm per decade in some parts of southern Europe, in particular in summer.
  • Projected changes in precipitation vary substantially across regions and seasons. Annual precipitation is generally projected to increase in northern Europe and to decrease in southern Europe. Projected decrease is the strongest in southern Europe in summer.
CLIM005 Storms (CLIM 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/storms-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/storms-1/assessment-1 What is the trend in extreme wind speeds across Europe?
  • Storm location, frequency and intensity show considerable decadal variability across Europe over the past century, such that no long-term trends are apparent.
  • Recent studies on changes in winter storm tracks generally project an eastward extension of the North Atlantic storm track towards central Europe and the British isles, but this finding is not yet robust.
  • Climate change simulations show diverging projections on changes in the number of winter storms across Europe. However, almost all studies agree that storm intensities will increase in the future for the North Atlantic, northern, northwestern and central Europe.
CLIM007 Glaciers (CLIM 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/glaciers-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/glaciers-1/assessment-1 What is the trend in the mass and volume of glaciers across Europe?
  • The vast majority of glaciers in the European glacial regions are in retreat. Glaciers in the European Alps have lost approximately two thirds of their volume since 1850, with clear acceleration since the 1980s.
  • Glacier retreat is expected to continue in the future. The volume of European glaciers has been estimated to decline between 22 and 84 % compared to the current situation by 2100 under a moderate greenhouse gas forcing scenario and between 38 and 89% under a high forcing scenario.
  • Glacier retreat has contributed to global sea-level rise with about 0.8 mm per year in 2005-2009. It also affects freshwater supply and run off regimes, river navigation, irrigation and power generation. Furthermore it may cause natural hazards and damage to infrastructure.
CLIM008 Snow cover (CLIM 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/snow-cover-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/snow-cover-2/assessment-1 What is the trend in snow cover extent and snow mass in Europe?
  • Snow cover extent in the Northern Hemisphere has declined significantly over the past 90 years, with most of the reductions occurring since 1980. Snow cover extent in the Northern Hemisphere has decreased by 7% on average in March and April and by 53% in June over the 1967–2012 period; the observed reductions in Europe are even larger at 13% for March and April and 87% for June.
  • Snow mass in the Northern hemisphere has decreased by 7 % in March from 1982 to 2009; snow mass in Europe has decreased even more, but with large inter-annual variation.
  • Model simulations project widespread reductions in the extent and duration of snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere and in Europe over the 21st century.
  • Changes in snow cover affect the Earth’s surface reflectivity, water resources, the flora and fauna and their ecology, agriculture, forestry, tourism, snow sports, transport and power generation.
CLIM009 Greenland ice sheet (CLIM 009) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenland-ice-sheet-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenland-ice-sheet-2/assessment-1 What is the trend in the mass and the melting area of the Greenland ice sheet , and what is the effect on global sea level?
  • The Greenland ice sheet is the largest body of ice in the Northern Hemisphere and plays an important role in the global climate system. Melting of the Greenland ice sheet has contributed about one fifth to global sea level rise in the last decade.
  • The Greenland ice sheet has lost ice during the last two decades at an increasing rate. The average ice loss increased from 34 billion tonnes per year over the period 1992-2001 to 215 billion tonnes per year over the period 2002-2011 and 375 billion tonnes per year over the period 2011-2013.
  • Model projections suggest further declines of the Greenland ice sheet in the future but the uncertainties are large. The upper bounds for the sea-level contribution during the 21st century and the 3rd millennium (until the year 3000) are 16 cm and 4-5 m, respectively.

CLIM011 Permafrost (CLIM 011) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/mountain-permafrost-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/mountain-permafrost-1/assessment-1 What is the trend in the temperature and the thawing depth of permafrost soils across Europe?
  • In the past 10–20 years European permafrost has shown a general warming trend, with greatest warming in the cold permafrost in Svalbard and Scandinavia. The depth of seasonal thaw has increased at several European permafrost sites. Some sites show great interannual variability, which reflects the complex interaction between the atmospheric conditions and local snow and ground characteristics.
  • Recent projections agree on substantial near-surface permafrost degradation resulting in thaw depth deepening (i.e. permafrost degeneration) over much of the permafrost area.
  • Warming and thawing of permafrost is expected to increase the risk of rock falls, debris flows and ground subsidence. Thawing of permafrost also affects biodiversity and can contribute to climate change through release of CO2 and CH4 from Arctic permafrost areas.
CLIM012 Global and European sea-level rise (CLIM 012) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sea-level-rise-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sea-level-rise-2/assessment What is the trend in mean sea level globally and across European seas?
  • Global mean sea level (GMSL) has risen by 19 cm from 1901 to 2013 at an average rate of 1.7 mm/year. There has been significant decadal variation of the rate of increase but an acceleration is detectable over this period. The rate of sea level rise over the last two decades, when satellite measurements have been available, is higher at 3.2 mm/year.
  • Most coastal regions in Europe have experienced an increase in absolute sea level as well as in sea level relative to land, but there is significant regional variation.
  • Extreme high coastal water levels have increased at many locations around the European coastline. This increase appears to be predominantly due to increases in mean local sea level at most locations rather than to changes in storm activity.
  • GMSL rise during the 21st century will very likely occur at a higher rate than during 1971–2010. Process-based models project a rise in 2081–2100, compared to 1986–2005, that is likely to be in the range 0.26–0.54 m for a low emissions scenario (RCP2.6) and 0.45–0.81 m for a high emissions scenario (RCP8.5). Projections of GMSL rise from semi-empirical models are up to twice as large as from process-based models, but there is low confidence in their projections.
  • Available process-based models indicate GMSL rise by 2300 to be less than 1 m for greenhouse gas concentrations that peak and decline and do not exceed 500 ppm CO2-equivalent but 1 m to more than 3 m for concentrations above 700 ppm CO2-equivalent. However, these models are likely to systematically underestimate the sea level contribution from Antarctica. The multi-millennial sea level commitment is estimated at 1–3 m GMSL rise per degree of warming.
  • The rise in sea level relative to land at European coasts is projected to be similar to the global average, with the exception of the northern Baltic Sea and the northern Atlantic coast, which are experiencing considerable land rise as a consequence of post-glacial rebound.
  • Projected increases in extreme high coastal water levels in Europe will likely be dominated by increases in local relative mean sea level, with changes in the meteorologically-driven surge component being less important at most locations.
CLIM013 Sea surface temperature (CLIM 013) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sea-surface-temperature-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sea-surface-temperature-1/assessment-1 What is the trend in surface water temperature across European seas?
  • Sea surface temperature in European seas has been increasing in the past century at a faster rate than the global ocean.
  • The rate of increase in sea surface temperature in all European seas during the past 25 years is the largest ever measured in any 25-year period. It has been several times faster than the average rate of increase during the past century, and it is also much faster than the global ocean.
  • Globally averaged sea surface temperature is projected to continue to increase although more slowly than atmospheric temperature. 
CLIM014 Phenology of marine species (CLIM 014) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/marine-phenology-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/marine-phenology-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the seasonal cycle of marine organisms in European seas?
  • Temperature increases in the ocean have caused many marine organisms in European seas to appear earlier in their seasonal cycles than in the past. Some plankton species have advanced their seasonal cycle by 4–6 weeks in recent decades.
  • Projections of the phenological responses of individual species are not available, but phenological changes are expected to continue with projected further climate change.
  • Changes in the plankton phenology have important consequences for other organisms within an ecosystem and ultimately for the structure of marine food webs at all trophic levels. Potential consequences include increased vulnerability of North Sea cod stocks to over-fishing and changes in seabird populations.
CLIM015 Distribution of marine species (CLIM 015) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/northward-movement-of-marine-species-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/northward-movement-of-marine-species-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the regional distribution of marine organisms in European seas?
  • Increases in regional sea temperatures have triggered a major northward expansion of warmer-water plankton in the North-east Atlantic and a northward retreat of colder-water plankton. This northerly movement is about 10 ° latitude (1 100  km) over the past 40 years, and it seems to have accelerated since 2000.
  • Sub-tropical species are occurring with increasing frequency in European waters, and sub-Arctic species are receding northwards.
  • Further changes in the distribution of marine species are expected, with projected further climate change, but quantitative projections are not available.
CLIM016 River flow (CLIM 016) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/river-flow-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/river-flow-2/assessment What is the trend in mean river flow in different seasons across Europe?
  • Long-term trends in river flows due to climate change are difficult to detect due to substantial inter annual and decadal variability as well as modifications to natural water flows arising from water abstractions, man-made reservoirs and land-use changes. Nevertheless, increased river flows during winter and lower river flows during summer have been recorded since the 1960s in large parts of Europe.
  • Climate change is projected to result in strong changes in the seasonality of river flows across Europe. Summer flows are projected to decrease in most of Europe, including in regions where annual flows are projected to increase.
CLIM017 River floods (CLIM 017) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/river-floods-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/river-floods-1/assessment What is the trend in river floods across Europe?
  • More than 325 major river floods have been reported for Europe since 1980, of which more than 200 have been reported since 2000.
  • The rise in the reported number of flood events over recent decades results mainly from better reporting and from land-use changes
  • Global warming is projected to intensify the hydrological cycle and increase the occurrence and frequency of flood events in large parts of Europe. However, estimates of changes in flood frequency and magnitude remain highly uncertain. In regions with reduced snow accumulation during winter, the risk of early spring flooding would decrease.
CLIM018 River flow drought (CLIM 018) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/river-flow-drought-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/river-flow-drought-1/assessment What is the trend in minimum river flow across Europe?
  • Europe has been affected by several major droughts in recent decades, such as the catastrophic drought associated with the 2003 summer heat wave in central parts of the continent and the 2005 drought in the Iberian Peninsula.
  • Severity and frequency of droughts appear to have increased in parts of Europe, in particular in southern Europe.
  • Regions most prone to an increase in drought hazard are southern and south-eastern Europe, but minimum river flows will also decrease significantly in many other parts of the continent, especially in summer.
CLIM019 Water temperature (CLIM 019) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-temperature-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-temperature-1/assessment What is the trend in the water temperature of rivers and lakes across Europe?
  • Water temperatures in major European rivers have increased by 1–3 °C over the last century. Several time series show increasing lake and river temperatures all over Europe over the last 60 to 90 years.
  • Lake and river surface water temperatures are projected to increase with further projected increases in air temperature.
  • Increased temperature can result in marked changes in species composition and functioning of aquatic ecosystems.
CLIM020 Lake and river ice cover (CLIM 020) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/lake-and-river-ice-cover-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/lake-and-river-ice-cover-1/assessment What is the trend in the ice cover of rivers and lakes across Europe?
  • The existence of ice cover and the timing of ice break-up influence the vertical mixing of lakes and are therefore of critical ecological importance.
  • The duration of ice cover on European lakes and rivers has shortened at a mean rate of 12 days per century over the last 150–200 years.
  • A further decrease in the duration of lake ice cover is projected with projected climate change.
CLIM023 Plant and fungi phenology (CLIM 023) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/plant-phenology-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/plant-phenology-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the seasonal cycle of plants and fungi in Europe?
  • The timing of seasonal events in plants is changing across Europe, mainly due to changes in climate conditions. Seventy-eight per cent of leaf unfolding and flowering records show advancing trends in recent decades whereas only 3 % show a significant delay. Between 1971 and 2000, the average advance of spring and summer was between 2.5 and 4 days per decade.
  • As a consequence of climate-induced changes in plant phenology, the pollen season starts on average 10 days earlier and is longer than it was 50 years ago.
  • Trends in seasonal events are projected to advance further as climate warming proceeds.
CLIM024 Distribution and abundance of animal species (CLIM 024) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/distribution-of-animal-species-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/distribution-of-animal-species-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the regional distribution of animals in Europe, and what are the implications for biodiversity?
  • Observed climate change is having significant impacts on European fauna. These impacts include range shifts as well as local and regional extinctions of species.
  • There is a clear poleward trend of butterfly distributions from 1990 to 2007 in Europe. Nevertheless, the migration of many species is lagging behind the changes in climate, suggesting that they are unable to keep pace with the speed of climate change.
  • Distribution changes are projected to continue. Suitable climatic conditions for Europe’s breeding birds are projected to shift nearly 550 km north-east by the end of the 21st century under a scenario of 3 °C warming, with the average range size shrinking by 20 %.
  • Habitat use and fragmentation and other obstacles are impeding the migration of many animal species. The difference between required and actual migration rate may lead to a progressive decline in European biodiversity.
CLIM025 Animal phenology (CLIM 025) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/animal-phenology-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/animal-phenology-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the seasonal cycle of animals in Europe?
  • Many animal groups have advanced their life-cycles in recent decades, including frogs spawning, birds nesting and the arrival of migrant birds and butterflies. This advancement is attributed primarily to a warming climate.
  • The breeding season of many thermophilic insects (such as butterflies, dragonflies and bark beetles) has been lengthening, allowing more generations to be produced per year.
  • The observed trends are expected to continue in the future but quantitative projections are rather uncertain.
CLIM026 Species interactions (CLIM 026) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-ecosystem-relationship-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-ecosystem-relationship-1/assessment-1 How is climate change affecting food networks and other species interactions, and what are the implications for biodiversity?
  • Climate change is affecting the interaction of species that depend on each other for food or other reasons. It can disrupt established interactions but also generate novel ones.
  • Negative effects on single species are often amplified by changes in interactions with other species, in particular for specialist species.
CLIM027 Soil organic carbon (CLIM 027/LSI 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-organic-carbon-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-organic-carbon-1/assessment What is the trend in soil organic carbon in Europe?
  • Soil carbon stocks in the EU-27 are around 75 billion tonnes of carbon; around 50 % of which is located in Ireland, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom (because of the large area of peatlands in these countries).
  • The largest emissions of CO2 from soils are due to conversion (drainage) of organic soils, and amount to 20–40 tonnes of CO2 per hectare per year. The most effective option to manage soil carbon in order to mitigate climate change is to preserve existing stocks in soils, and especially the large stocks in peat and other soils with a high content of organic carbon.
  • On average, soils in Europe are most likely to be accumulating carbon. Soils under grassland and forests are a carbon sink (estimated up to 80 million tonnes of carbon per year) whereas soils under arable land are a smaller carbon source (estimated from 10–40 million tonnes of carbon per year).
  • The effects of climate change on soil organic carbon and soil respiration are complex, and depend on distinct climatic and biotic drivers. However, they lack rigorous supporting datasets.
  • Climate change is expected to have an impact on soil carbon in the long term, but changes in the short term will more likely be driven by land management practices and land use change
CLIM028 Soil erosion (CLIM 028/LSI 006) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-erosion-by-water-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-erosion-by-water-1/assessment How are European soils affected by water and wind erosion?
  • 105 million ha., or 16 % of Europe’s total land area (excluding Russia) were estimated to be affected by water erosion in the 1990s.
  • Some 42 million ha. of land were estimated to be affected by wind erosion, of which around 1 million ha. were categorised as being severely affected.
  • A recent new model of soil erosion by water has estimated the surface area affected in the EU‐27 at 130 million ha. Almost 20 % is subjected to soil loss in excess of 10 tonnes/ha./year.
  • Increased variations in rainfall pattern and intensity will make soils more susceptible to water erosion, with off-site effects of soil erosion increasing.
  • Increased aridity will make finer-textured soils more vulnerable to wind erosion, especially if accompanied by a decrease in soil organic matter levels.
  • Reliable quantitative projections for soil erosion are not available.
CLIM029 Soil moisture (CLIM 029/LSI 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-retention-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-retention-3/assessment How is soil moisture changing in Europe?
  • Soil moisture content is already being affected by rising temperatures and changes in precipitation amounts, both of which are evidence of changes in climate.
  • Since 1951, modelled soil moisture content significantly increased in parts of northern Europe and decreased in the Mediterranean region.
  • Projections for 2021–2050 show a general change in summer soil moisture content over most of Europe, including significant decreases in the Mediterranean region and increases in the northeastern part of Europe.
  • Maintaining water-retention capacity and porosity are important to reduce the impacts of intense rainfall and droughts, which are projected to become more frequent and severe.
  • The modelled results are based on natural factors and disregard artificial drainage and irrigation practices.
CLIM030 Growing season for agricultural crops (CLIM 030) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/growing-season-for-agricultural-crops-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/growing-season-for-agricultural-crops-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the growing season for agricultural crops?
  • The thermal growing season of a number of agricultural crops in Europe has lengthened by 11.4 days on average from 1992 to 2008. The delay in the end of the growing season was more pronounced than the advance of its start.
  • The growing season is projected to increase further throughout most of Europe due to earlier onset of growth in spring and later senescence in autumn.
  • The projected lengthening of the thermal growing season would allow a northward expansion of warm-season crops to areas that were not previously suitable.
CLIM031 Agrophenology (CLIM 031) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/timing-of-the-cycle-of-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/timing-of-the-cycle-of-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the seasonal cycle of agricultural crops across Europe?
  • Flowering of several perennial crops has advanced by about two days per decade in recent decades.
  • Changes in timing of crop phenology are affecting crop production and the relative performance of different crop species and varieties.
  • The shortening of crop growth phases in many crops is expected to continue. The shortening of the grain filling phase of cereals and oilseed crops can be particularly detrimental to yield.
CLIM032 Water-limited crop productivity (CLIM 032) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/crop-yield-variability-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/crop-yield-variability-1/assessment-1 How is climate change affecting the water-limited productivity of agricultural crops across Europe?
  • Yields of several crops are stagnating (e.g. wheat in some European countries) or decreasing (e.g. grapes in Spain), whereas yields of other crops (e.g. maize in northern Europe) are increasing. These effects are attributed partly due to observed climate change, in particular warming.
  • Extreme climatic events, including droughts and heat waves, have negatively affected crop productivity during the first decade of the 21st century. Projected increases in extreme climatic events are expected to further increase yield variability in the future.
  • Crop yields are affected by the combined effects of changes in temperature, rainfall and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Future climate change can lead to both decreases and increases in yield, depending on the crop type and the climatic and management conditions in the region.
CLIM034 Forest growth (CLIM 034) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/forest-growth-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/forest-growth-1/assessment How is climate change affecting forest growth in Europe?
  • The area covered by forests and other wooded land in Europe (39 EEA countries) has increased for many decades.
  • Forest biomass in the EEA region is also growing, and the average growth rate has increased from 1990 to 2010.
  • In some central and western areas of Europe, forest growth has been reduced in the last 10 years due to storms, pests and diseases.
  • Future climate change and increasing CO2 concentrations are expected to affect site suitability, productivity, species composition and biodiversity, and thus have an impact on the goods and services that the forests provide. In general, forest growth is projected to increase in northern Europe and to decrease in southern Europe.
CLIM035 Forest fires (CLIM 035) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/forest-fire-danger-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/forest-fire-danger-1/assessment How is climate change affecting forest fire risk in Europe?
  • Fire risk depends on many factors, including climatic conditions, vegetation (e.g. fuel load and condition), forest management practices and other socio-economic factors.
  • The number of fires in the Mediterranean region has increased over the period from 1980 to 2000; it has decreased thereafter.
  • In a warmer climate, more severe fire weather and an expansion of the fire-prone area and longer fire seasons, as a consequence, are projected, but with considerable regional variation.
  • The impact of fire events is particularly strong in southern Europe on already degraded ecosystems.
CLIM037 Vector-borne diseases (CLIM 037) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/vector-borne-diseases-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/vector-borne-diseases-1/assessment What are health effects of vector-borne diseases across Europe, and how are they changing?
  • The transmission cycles of vector-borne diseases are sensitive to climatic factors but also to land use, vector control, human behaviour and public health capacities.
  • Climate change is regarded as the main factor behind the observed northward and upward move of the tick species Ixodes ricinus in parts of Europe.
  • Climate change is projected to lead to further northward and upward shifts in the distribution of I. ricinus. It is also expected to affect the habitat suitability for a wide range of disease vectors, including Aedes albopictus and phlebotomine species of sandflies, in both directions.
CLIM039 Damages from weather and climate-related events (CLIM 039) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/direct-losses-from-weather-disasters-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/direct-losses-from-weather-disasters-1/assessment What is the trend in the number of natural disasters and in the damage costs caused by them?
  • Hydro-meteorological events (storms, floods, and landslides) account for 64 % of the reported damages due to natural disasters in Europe since 1980; climatological events (extreme temperatures; droughts and forest fires) account for another 20 %.
  • Overall damages from extreme weather events have increased from EUR 9 billion in the 1980s to more than EUR 13 billion in the 2000s (inflation-corrected).
  • The observed damage increase is primarily due to increases in population, economic wealth and human activities in hazard-prone areas and to better reporting.
  • It is currently difficult to determine accurately the proportion of damage costs that are attributable to climate change. The contribution of climate change to the damage costs from natural disasters is expected to increase due to the projected changes in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events.
CLIM043 Ocean acidification (CLIM 043) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ocean-acidification http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ocean-acidification/assessment-1 What is the trend in the acidity of ocean water?
  • Surface-ocean pH has declined from 8.2 to below 8.1 over the industrial era due to the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This decline corresponds to an increase in oceanic acidity of 26%.
  • Observed reductions in surface-water pH are nearly identical across the global ocean and throughout Europe’s seas.
  • Ocean acidification in recent decades is occurring a hundred times faster than during past natural events over the last 55 million years.
  • Ocean acidification already reaches into the deep ocean, particularly in the high latitudes.
  • Models consistently project further ocean acidification worldwide. Surface ocean pH is projected to decrease to values between 8.05 and 7.75 by the end of 21st century depending on future CO2 emission levels. The largest projected decline represents more than a doubling in acidity.
  • Ocean acidification may affect many marine organisms within the next 20 years and could alter marine ecosystems and fisheries.
CLIM044 Ocean heat content (CLIM 044) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ocean-heat-content http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ocean-heat-content/assessment-1 What is the trend in the heat content of the global ocean?
  • The warming of the World Ocean accounts for approximately 93 % of the warming of the Earth system during the last six decades. Warming of the upper (0–700 m) ocean accounted for about 64% of the total heat uptake.
  • An increasing trend in the heat content in the uppermost 700 m depth of the World Ocean is evident over the last six decades. Recent observations show substantial warming also of the deeper ocean (between 700 m and 2 000 m depth and below 3000 m depth).
  • Further warming of the oceans is expected with projected climate change. The amount of warming is strongly dependent on the emissions scenario.
CLIM047 Heating degree days (CLIM 047) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/heating-degree-days-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/heating-degree-days-1/assessment How is climate change affecting the energy demand for space heating across Europe?
  • The number of heating degree days (HDD) has decreased by an average of 16 per year since 1980. This helps reduce the demand for heating, particularly in northern and north-western Europe.
  • Climate change will affect future energy and electricity demand. Climate change is not expected to change total energy demand in Europe substantially across Europe, but there may be significant seasonal effects, with large regional differences.
CLIM048 Production, sales and emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) (CLIM 048) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-and-consumption-of-fluorinated http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-and-consumption-of-fluorinated/assessment-2 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases?

Since 1990, EU-28 F-gas emissions have experienced significant growth, more than offsetting an intermittent decrease between 1997 and 2001. While PFCs and SF6 emissions have reduced by a significant degree, a major rise can be observed for HFCs emissions, which have almost tripled since 1990.

In 2013, the net supply of F-gases to the EU declined for the third consecutive year since 2010, both in terms of metric tonnes and CO2-equivalents. The 2013 net supply levels are slightly below the low levels of the ‘economic crisis’ year, 2009. EU production appears to have stabilised slightly above 2008 levels after the sharp decline that was observed from 2007 to 2009. Imports of F-gases grew from 2007 to 2008, experienced a dip in the 'economic crisis' year of 2009 and have been on the decline from 2010 to 2012. However, in 2013 imports rose back to 2011 levels. Exports of F-gases have been on the rise since 2009 when expressed in metric tonnes, however, they are still below 2007 levels. Expressed in CO2-equivalents, however, 2013 exports dropped slightly.

Context: Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) covered by the UNFCCC’s Kyoto Protocol comprise hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). These F-gases typically have very long lifetimes in the atmosphere and high global warming potentials (GWPs). F-gases are mostly produced for use in products and equipment in the refrigeration and air conditioning sector, electrical equipment, foams, fire protection or as aerosols etc. Emissions take place mainly due to leakage during the use phase or due to failure to fully recover the F-gases at the end of the product/equipment lifetime. Future F-gas emissions are thus largely determined by (i) present day use of F-gases and (ii) measures to prevent leakage and encourage recovery.

CLIM049 Production and consumption of ozone depleting substances (CSI 006/CLIM 049) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/production-and-consumption-of-ozone http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/production-and-consumption-of-ozone/production-and-consumption-of-ozone-4 Are ozone-depleting substances being phased out according to the agreed schedule?

The total production and consumption of ozone depleting substances in EEA member countries has decreased significantly since the Montreal Protocol was signed in 1987 -  nowadays it is practically zero. Globally, the implementation of the Montreal Protocol has led to a decrease in the atmospheric burden of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) in the lower atmosphere and in the stratosphere.

Many of the ODS are also potent greenhouse gases in their own right, but as they are governed through the Montreal Protocol, they are not separately regulated under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Thus the phasing out of ODS under the Montreal Protocol has also avoided global greenhouse gas emissions. In 2010, it has been estimated that the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions  achieved under the Montreal Protocol was 5 to 6 times larger than that which will result from the UNFCCC's Kyoto Protocol first commitment period, 2008-2012.

CLIM050 Total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trends and projections (CSI 010/CLIM 050) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-trends-5 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-trends-5/assessment-1 What is the progress in Europe towards international commitments regarding GHG emissions?
  • In 2012 EU GHG emissions were 19.2 % below 1990 levels (excluding LULUCF and international aviation).  Preliminary estimates for 2013 show a further fall of 80 Mt CO2 eq. between 2012 and 2013 (20.7 % below 1990 levels). 
  • Almost all EEA countries are well on track towards achieving its commitments under the first period of the Kyoto Protocol.
  • EU-15 average emissions between 2008 and 2012 were 11.8 % below base-year levels.
  • In the EU, emissions covered by the Emission Trading System (ETS) between in 2013 were 19 % below 2005 levels. 
  • In 2013, all EU Member States apart from Germany, Luxembourg and Poland, are considered to be on track to meet their annual targets. 
  • For six Member States, projections indicate that implementing the additional measures which were in planning stage in 2013 might not be sufficient to reduce GHG emissions below targets by 2020 under the Effort Sharing Decision.
CLIM051 Progress to greenhouse gas emission targets (CSI 011/CLIM 051) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-projections http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-projections/greenhouse-gas-emission-projections-assessment-4 What progress is made towards the greenhouse gas emissions targets by the EU?

At the end of 2011, almost all European countries were on track towards their Kyoto targets for 2008–2012. The EU‑15 is on track towards this 8 % reduction target, compared to base-year levels under the Kyoto Protocol.

Projections from EU Member States indicate that their emissions outside the EU ETS will be lower than their national targets set under the Climate and Energy Package. Total EU emissions are projected to fall slightly until 2020. With the current set of national domestic measures in place, Member States are expected to reach a level in 2020 which is 19 % below 1990 levels and close to the 20 % reduction target.

CLIM052 Atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations (CSI 013/CLIM 052) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/atmospheric-greenhouse-gas-concentrations-4 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/atmospheric-greenhouse-gas-concentrations-4/assessment Will the atmospheric concentration of all greenhouse gases remain below 450 ppm CO2-equivalent, giving a 50% probability that the global temperature rise will not exceed 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels?
  • The global average concentrations of various greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere continue to increase. The combustion of fossil fuels from human activities and land-use changes are largely responsible for this increase.
  • The concentration of all GHGs, including cooling aerosols that are relevant in the context of the 2oC temperature target, reached a value of 435 parts per million (ppm) CO2 equivalents in 2012, an increase of about 3 ppm compared to 2011. As such the concentration continued to close on the threshold of 450 ppm.  
  • In 2012, the concentration of the six GHGs included in the Kyoto Protocol had reached 449 ppm CO2 equivalent, an increase of 171 ppm (around +62%) compared to pre-industrial levels.
  • The concentration of CO2, the most important GHG, reached a level of 393 ppm by 2012, and further increased to 396 ppm in 2013. This is an increase of approximately 118 ppm (around +42%) compared to pre-industrial levels.
CSI002 Emissions of ozone precursors (CSI 002/APE 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-ozone-precursors-version-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-ozone-precursors-version-2/assessment-4 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of ozone precursors across Europe?
  • Emissions of the main ground-level ozone precursor pollutants have decreased across the EEA-33 region between 1990 and 2011; nitrogen oxides (NOX) by 44%, non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) by 57%, carbon monoxide (CO) by 61%, and methane (CH4) by 29%.
  • This decrease has been achieved mainly as a result of the introduction of catalytic converters for vehicles, which has significantly reduced emissions of NOX and CO from the road transport sector, the main source of ozone precursor emissions.
  • The EU-28 as a whole reported 2011 emissions at 4% below the 2010 NECD ceiling for NOX, one of the two ozone precursors (NOX and NMVOC) for which emission limits exist under the EU's NEC Directive (NECD). Total NMVOC emissions in the EU-28 were 22% below the 2010 NECD limit in 2011, however, seven of individual Member States did not meet their ceilings for one or both of these two pollutants.
  • Of the three non-EU countries having emission ceilings for 2010 set under the UNECE/CLRTAP Gothenburg protocol (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland), all reported NMVOC emissions in 2011 that were lower than their respective ceilings, however Liechtenstein and Norway reported 2011 NOX emissions higher than their ceiling for 2010.
CSI003 Emissions of primary PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter (CSI 003/APE 009) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-primary-particles-and-5 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emissions-of-primary-particles-and-5/assessment-3 What progress is being made in reducing emissions of primary PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter ?
  • Total emissions of primary sub-10µm particulate matter (PM10) have reduced by 24% across the EEA-33 region between 1990 and 2011, driven by a 35% reduction in emissions of the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) fraction. Emissions of particulates between 2.5 and 10 µm have reduced by 12% over the same period; the difference of this trend to that of PM2.5 is due to significantly increased emissions in the 2.5 to 10 µm fraction from 'Road transport' and 'Agriculture' (of 20% and 6% respectively) since 1990.
  • Of this reduction in PM10 emissions, % has taken place in the 'Energy Production and Distribution' sector due to factors including the fuel-switching from coal to natural gas for electricity generation and improvements in the performance of pollution abatement equipment installed at industrial facilities.
CSI004 Exceedance of air quality limit values in urban areas (CSI 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exceedance-of-air-quality-limit-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exceedance-of-air-quality-limit-3/assessment What is the percentage of European urban population exposed to pollutant concentrations above the regulated thresholds?

In the period 2000-2012, a significant proportion of the urban population in the EU-28 was exposed to ambient concentrations of pollutants above the EU limit (LV) or target (TV) values for the protection of human health. The numbers of people exposed was even higher in relation to the more stringent World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The figures (minimum-maximum in the period) are:

  • For PM2.5, 4-14 % for EU LV and 87-98 % for WHO guideline (for the period 2006-2012 only).
  • For PM10, 21-41 % and 64-92 %,.
  • For ozone, 14-65 % and 93-99 %.
  • For NO2, 8-27 % in both cases.
  • For B(a)P, 20-28 % and 85-88 % (for the period 2008-2012 only).

Air quality has slowly improved over past years. Following the decreasing tendencies, in 2012 fewer people (urban population) were exposed to concentrations above the PM10 EU LV and WHO guideline; the O3 EU TV; the NO2 EU LV and WHO guideline; and the SO2 EU LV and WHO guideline values. 

 

CSI005 Exposure of ecosystems to acidification, eutrophication and ozone (CSI 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exposure-of-ecosystems-to-acidification-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exposure-of-ecosystems-to-acidification-3/assessment What progress is being made towards the targets for reducing the exposure of ecosystems to acidification, eutrophication and ozone?

Acidification and eutrophication

  • Acidification: In the EU-28, the ecosystem area where acidification critical loads were exceeded decreased from 43% in 1980 to 7% in 2010 (7% for all EEA member countries). There remain some areas where the interim objective for reducing acidification, as defined in the National Emission Ceiling Directive 2001/81/EC, has not been met. 
  • Eutrophication: The EU-28 ecosystem area, where the critical loads for eutrophication were exceeded, peaked at 84% in 1990 and decreased to 63% in 2010 (55% in EEA member countries). This percentage is projected to decrease to 54% in 2020, assuming implementation of current legislation (48% in EEA member countries). The magnitude of the exceedances is projected to reduce considerably in most areas, except for a few 'hot spot' areas in western France and the border areas between the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, as well as in northern Italy.
  • Outlook: Only 4% of the EU-28 ecosystem area is still projected to be in exceedance of acidification critical loads in 2020 if current legislation is fully implemented (3% in EEA member countries). The eutrophication reduction target set in the updated EU air pollution strategy proposed by the European Commission in late 2013, will be met by 2030 if it is assumed that all maximum technically feasible reduction measures are implemented, but will not be met by current legislation.

Ozone

  • Most of the vegetation and agricultural crops are exposed to ozone levels exceeding the long term objective given in the EU Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC. A significant fraction is also exposed to levels above the target value threshold defined in the directive. For the past three years, however, the agricultural area exposed to concentrations above the target value threshold is well below 25%.
  • Accumulated concentrations of crop exposure to ozone over summer months show large year-to-year variations. There is a tendency to decreasing levels after 2006, although this is not statistically significant.
  • With regard to forest ozone exposure, during the period 2004 to 2011, 60% or more of the forest area has been exposed to concentrations above the critical level set by the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution.

CSI006 Production and consumption of ozone depleting substances (CSI 006/CLIM 049) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/production-and-consumption-of-ozone http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/production-and-consumption-of-ozone/production-and-consumption-of-ozone-4 Are ozone-depleting substances being phased out according to the agreed schedule?

The total production and consumption of ozone depleting substances in EEA member countries has decreased significantly since the Montreal Protocol was signed in 1987 -  nowadays it is practically zero. Globally, the implementation of the Montreal Protocol has led to a decrease in the atmospheric burden of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) in the lower atmosphere and in the stratosphere.

Many of the ODS are also potent greenhouse gases in their own right, but as they are governed through the Montreal Protocol, they are not separately regulated under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Thus the phasing out of ODS under the Montreal Protocol has also avoided global greenhouse gas emissions. In 2010, it has been estimated that the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions  achieved under the Montreal Protocol was 5 to 6 times larger than that which will result from the UNFCCC's Kyoto Protocol first commitment period, 2008-2012.

CSI007 Species of European interest (SEBI 003/CSI 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-of-european-interest http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-of-european-interest/species-of-european-interest-assessment What is the conservation status of species of Community interest? Around half of the species of Community interest (those species which, within the territory of the European Union are listed in Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive) have an unfavourable conservation status, with variation across biogeographic regions (1).
There are still significant gaps in knowledge, especially for marine species.

(1)
The reporting format uses three classes of Conservation Status. 'Good' (green) signifies that the species or habitat is at Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) as defined in the Directive and the habitat or species can be expected to prosper without any change to existing management or policies. In addition, two classes of 'Unfavourable' are recognised: 'Unfavourable-Bad' (red) signifies that the habitat or species is in serious danger of becoming extinct (at least locally) and 'Unfavourable-Inadequate' (amber) is used for situations where a change in management or policy is required but the danger of extinction is not so high. The unfavourable category has been split into two classes to allow improvements or deterioration to be reported. (Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines DRAFT 2 January 2006).
CSI008 Designated areas (CSI 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/designated-areas http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/designated-areas/designated-areas-assessment-published-mar-2009 What measures are being taken to ensure the in situ conservation of biodiversity components?

The designation of protected areas is a cornerstone for the conservation of biodiversity worldwide, from genes to species, habitats and ecosystems. In June 2006, the Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) re-affirmed the role of protected areas  as  cornerstones of biodiversity conservation, but also highlighted that many are "beset with managerial and financial difficulties that impede their effective management".

  • At the European level, there has been an increase in the total area of nationally-designated protected areas over time, indicating a positive commitment by European countries to biodiversity conservation. The total area of nationally designated sites in 39 European countries was around 100 million hectares in 2008.
  • There has also been an increase in the total area of Natura 2000 sites over the past two years with 52 million hectares designated as Special Protected Areas and 65 million as Sites of Community Importance.
  • At least 45 % of SCIs surface is also covered by one national designation.
  • The level of sufficiency in designating Natura 2000 sites for the Habitats Directive is high for most EU-27 countries (21 countries have sufficiency above 80%) and the new Member States are doing well. 

In addition to quantitative signals it is important to also keep in mind the crucial need to have a qualitative view on the efficiency of the network of designated areas.

  • Marine areas are not yet represented as Natura 2000 sites as the phase of proposals is still going on.
  • There are increasing pressures on biodiversity outside of protected areas, and an assessment of the effectiveness of designated sites in protecting and conserving biodiversity is needed in a broader scale and with the climate change perspective.
  • Assessments of conservation status of species and habitats of Community interest are available and will help to get this qualitative view.
CSI010 Total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trends and projections (CSI 010/CLIM 050) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-trends-5 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-trends-5/assessment-1 What is the progress in Europe towards international commitments regarding GHG emissions?
  • In 2012 EU GHG emissions were 19.2 % below 1990 levels (excluding LULUCF and international aviation).  Preliminary estimates for 2013 show a further fall of 80 Mt CO2 eq. between 2012 and 2013 (20.7 % below 1990 levels). 
  • Almost all EEA countries are well on track towards achieving its commitments under the first period of the Kyoto Protocol.
  • EU-15 average emissions between 2008 and 2012 were 11.8 % below base-year levels.
  • In the EU, emissions covered by the Emission Trading System (ETS) between in 2013 were 19 % below 2005 levels. 
  • In 2013, all EU Member States apart from Germany, Luxembourg and Poland, are considered to be on track to meet their annual targets. 
  • For six Member States, projections indicate that implementing the additional measures which were in planning stage in 2013 might not be sufficient to reduce GHG emissions below targets by 2020 under the Effort Sharing Decision.
CSI011 Progress to greenhouse gas emission targets (CSI 011/CLIM 051) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-projections http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-projections/greenhouse-gas-emission-projections-assessment-4 What progress is made towards the greenhouse gas emissions targets by the EU?

At the end of 2011, almost all European countries were on track towards their Kyoto targets for 2008–2012. The EU‑15 is on track towards this 8 % reduction target, compared to base-year levels under the Kyoto Protocol.

Projections from EU Member States indicate that their emissions outside the EU ETS will be lower than their national targets set under the Climate and Energy Package. Total EU emissions are projected to fall slightly until 2020. With the current set of national domestic measures in place, Member States are expected to reach a level in 2020 which is 19 % below 1990 levels and close to the 20 % reduction target.

CSI013 Atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations (CSI 013/CLIM 052) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/atmospheric-greenhouse-gas-concentrations-4 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/atmospheric-greenhouse-gas-concentrations-4/assessment Will the atmospheric concentration of all greenhouse gases remain below 450 ppm CO2-equivalent, giving a 50% probability that the global temperature rise will not exceed 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels?
  • The global average concentrations of various greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere continue to increase. The combustion of fossil fuels from human activities and land-use changes are largely responsible for this increase.
  • The concentration of all GHGs, including cooling aerosols that are relevant in the context of the 2oC temperature target, reached a value of 435 parts per million (ppm) CO2 equivalents in 2012, an increase of about 3 ppm compared to 2011. As such the concentration continued to close on the threshold of 450 ppm.  
  • In 2012, the concentration of the six GHGs included in the Kyoto Protocol had reached 449 ppm CO2 equivalent, an increase of 171 ppm (around +62%) compared to pre-industrial levels.
  • The concentration of CO2, the most important GHG, reached a level of 393 ppm by 2012, and further increased to 396 ppm in 2013. This is an increase of approximately 118 ppm (around +42%) compared to pre-industrial levels.
CSI014 Land take (CSI 014/LSI 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/land-take-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/land-take-2/assessment-2 How much and in what proportions is agricultural, forest and other semi-natural and natural land being taken for urban and other artificial land development?

Land take by the expansion of residential areas and construction sites is the main cause of the increase in the coverage of urban land at the European level. Agricultural zones and, to a lesser extent, forests and semi-natural and natural areas, are disappearing in favour of the development of artificial surfaces. This affects biodiversity since it decreases habitats, the living space of a number of species, and fragments the landscapes that support and connect them. The annual land take in European countries assessed by 2006 Corine land cover project (EEA39 except Greece) was approximately 108 000 ha/year in 2000-2006. In 21 countries covered by both periods (1990-2000 and 2000-2006) the annual land take decreased by 9 % in the later period. The composition of land taken areas changed, too. More arable land and permanent crops and less pastures and mosaic farmland were taken by artificial development then in 1990-2000. Identified trends are expected to change little when next assessment for 2006-2012 becomes available in 2014.

CSI015 Progress in management of contaminated sites (CSI 015/LSI 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-sites-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-sites-3/assessment How is the problem of contaminated sites being addressed (clean-up of historical contamination and prevention of new contamination)?

Local soil contamination in 2011 was estimated at 2.5 million potentially contaminated sites in the EEA-39, of which about 45 % have been identified to date. About one third of an estimated total of 342 000 contaminated sites in the EEA-39 have already been identified and about 15 % of these 342 000 sites have been remediated. However, there are substantial differences in the underlying site definitions and interpretations that are used in different countries.

 

Four management steps are defined for the management and control of local soil contamination, namely site identification (or preliminary studies), preliminary investigations, main site investigations, and implementation of risk reduction measures. Progress with each of these steps provides evidence that countries are identifying potentially contaminated sites, verifying if these sites are actually contaminated and implementing remediation measures where these are required. Some countries have defined targets for the different steps.

 

Thirty of the 39 countries surveyed maintain comprehensive inventories for contaminated sites: 24 countries have central national data inventories, while six countries, namely Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Germany, Greece, Italy and Sweden, manage their inventories at the regional level. Almost all of the inventories include information on polluting activities, potentially contaminated sites and contaminated sites.

 

Contaminated soil continues to be commonly managed using “traditional” techniques, e.g. excavation and off-site disposal, which accounts for about one third of management practices. In-situ and ex-situ remediation techniques for contaminated soil are applied more or less equally.

 

Overall, the production sectors contribute more to local soil contamination than the service sectors, while mining activities are important sources of soil contamination in some countries. In the production sector, metal industries are reported as most polluting whereas the textile, leather, wood and paper industries are minor contributors to local soil contamination. Gasoline stations are the most frequently reported sources of contamination for the service sector.

 

The relative importance of different contaminants is similar for both liquid and solid matrices. The most frequent contaminants are mineral oils and heavy metals. Generally, phenols and cyanides make a negligible overall contribution to total contamination.

 

On average, 42 % of the total expenditure on the management of contaminated sites comes from public budgets. Annual national expenditures for the management of contaminated sites are on average about EUR 10.7 per capita. This corresponds to an average of 0.041 % of the national GDP. Around 81 % of the annual national expenditures for the management of contaminated sites is spent on remediation measures, while only 15 % is spent on site investigations.


It should be noted that all results derive from data provided by 27 (out of 39) countries that returned the questionnaire, and not all countries answered all questions.

CSI018 Use of freshwater resources (CSI 018/WAT 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-freshwater-resources http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-freshwater-resources/use-of-freshwater-resources-assessment-2 Is the abstraction rate of water sustainable?

Over the last 10-17 years the Water Exploitation Index (WEI) decreased in 24 EEA countries (Fig.1), as a result of water saving and water efficiency measures.
Total water abstraction decreased about 12 %, but one fifth  of Europe's population still lives in water-stressed countries (approx. 113 million inhabitants).

CSI019 Oxygen consuming substances in rivers (CSI 019/WAT 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers-7 Is organic matter and ammonium pollution of rivers decreasing?

Concentrations of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total ammonium have decreased in European rivers in the period 1992 to 2012 (Fig. 1), mainly due to general improvement in waste water treatment.

CSI020 Nutrients in freshwater (CSI 020/WAT 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-freshwater http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-freshwater/nutrients-in-freshwater-assessment-published-6 Are concentrations of nutrients in our freshwaters decreasing?
  • Since 2005, average nitrate concentrations in European groundwater have declined and in 2011, the mean concentration had almost returned to the 1992 level.
  • The average nitrate concentration in European rivers declined by 0.03 milligrams per liter of nitrogen (mg N/l) (0.8%) per year over the period 1992 to 2012.
  • The decline in nitrate concentration reflects the effect of measures to reduce agricultural inputs of nitrate, as well as improvements in wastewater treatment.
  • Average orthophosphate concentration in European rivers has decreased markedly over the last two decades (0.003 milligrams per liter of phosphorous (mg P/l) or 2.1% per year).
  • Also, average lake phosphorus concentration decreased over the period 1992-2012 (0.0004 mg P/l, or 0.8% per year).
  • The decrease in phosphorus concentration reflects both improvements in wastewater treatment and the reduction of phosphorus in detergents.
CSI021 Nutrients in transitional, coastal and marine waters (CSI 021/MAR 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and-3/assessment Are nutrient concentrations in European transitional, coastal and marine waters decreasing?

Between 1985 and 2012, most stations in European Seas that reported to the EEA showed no change in trends of concentrations of Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN) or orthophosphate. In addition, a decrease in concentrations was observed for 14% and 13% respectively, while only a minority of stations showed an increase.

These trends mostly refer to stations in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and Baltic Sea, however, due to lack of reported data for other regional seas. Available data shows nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations are decreasing in the southern North Sea which is an area with a recognised eutrophication problem. In the Baltic Sea, also affected by eutrophication, nitrogen concentrations are decreasing but phosphate concentrations show an increase at some stations. 

CSI022 Bathing water quality (CSI 022/WAT 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/bathing-water-quality http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/bathing-water-quality/bathing-water-quality-assessment-published-4 Is bathing water quality improving?
  • The quality of water at designated bathing waters in Europe (coastal and inland) has improved significantly since 1990.
  • Compliance with mandatory values in EU coastal bathing waters increased from just below 80 % in 1990 to 93.1 % in 2011. Compliance with guide values likewise rose from over 68 % to 80.1 % in 2011. 
  • Compliance with mandatory values in EU inland bathing waters increased from over 52 % in 1990 to 89.9 % in 2011. Similarly, the rate of compliance with guide values moved from over 36 % in 1990 to 70.4 % in 2011.
CSI023 Chlorophyll in transitional, coastal and marine waters (CSI 023/MAR 006) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/chlorophyll-in-transitional-coastal-and-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/chlorophyll-in-transitional-coastal-and-2/assessment Is eutrophication in European transitional, coastal and marine waters decreasing?
  • Between 1985 and 2012, 7% of all stations in European seas that reported to the EEA showed decreasing trends in summer chlorophyll concentrations, whereas in 4% of the stations, increasing trends were found. In the majority of the stations (89%), no trends were observed.
  • Based on available data, chlorophyll concentrations, which are an indicator of eutrophication, are decreasing in the Greater North Sea, Bay of Biscay and Adriatic Sea, but increasing in many parts of the Baltic Sea. No trend assessment was possible for the Black Sea.
CSI024 Urban waste water treatment (CSI 024/WAT 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/urban-waste-water-treatment http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/urban-waste-water-treatment/urban-waste-water-treatment-assessment-3 How effective are existing policies in reducing loading discharges of nutrients and organic matter?

Wastewater treatment in all parts of Europe has improved during the last 15-20 years. The percentage of the population connected to wastewater treatment in the Southern, South-Eastern and Eastern Europe has increased over the last ten years. Latest values of population connected to wastewater treatment in the Southern countries are comparable to the values of Central and Northern countries, whereas the values of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe are still relatively low compared to Central and Northern Europe.

CSI027 Final energy consumption by sector and fuel (CSI 027/ENER 016) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-by-sector-8 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-by-sector-8/assessment-2 Is final energy consumption decreasing in Europe?

Over the period 1990 and 2012 final energy consumption in EU28 increased by 2.3% (6.5% in EEA countries). Between 2005 and 2012 the final energy consumption in the EU28 decreased by 7.1% (5.0% in EEA countries). The services sector is the only sector where the energy consumption increased by 3.5% over the period 2005-2012. Between 2005 and 2012, the energy consumption dropped by 14% in industry, 5.1% in transport and 4% in households. The implementation of energy efficiency policies and the economic recession played an important part in the reduction of energy consumption. On average, each person in the EEA countries used 2.1 tonnes of oil equivalent to meet their energy needs in 2012.

CSI029 Primary energy consumption by fuel (CSI 029/ENER 026) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/primary-energy-consumption-by-fuel-5 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/primary-energy-consumption-by-fuel-5/assessment What are the trends concerning the energy mix in gross inland energy consumption Europe?

Primary energy consumption in EU 28 in 2012 was almost the same as in 1990 and amounted to 1585 Mtoe. Between 2005-2012, primary energy consumption in the EU28 decreased by 7.3% particularly due to the economic recession and energy efficiency improvements.

Primary energy consumption in the non-EU EEA countries doubled from 71 Mtoe in 1990 to 146 Mtoe in 2012. The main reason for the difference in the trend for this group of countries was the large increase in primary energy consumption in Turkey and, to a lesser extent, in Norway.

Fossil fuels (including non-renewable waste) continued to dominate primary energy consumption in EU28, but their share declined from 82.1% in 1990 to 73.9% in 2012. The share of renewable energy sources more than doubled over the period, from 4.5% in 1990 to 11.6% in 2012, increasing at an average annual rate of 4.4%/year. The share of nuclear energy in gross inland energy consumption increased slightly from 13.1% in 1990 to 14.4% in 2012.

CSI031 Renewable electricity (CSI 031/ENER 030) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-electricity-consumption-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-electricity-consumption-1/assessment-2 What is the share of each renewable electricity source in gross electricity generation in Europe?

In 2012, the share of renewable electricity in gross electricity consumption[1] in the EU28 was 24.1%. Hydropower accounted for 11% of all electricity generation in 2012, followed by wind (6%), biomass and wastes (3%), solar power (2%), and geothermal and other renewables (2%). Overall, renewable electricity grew at an annual average rate of 4.1% since 1990, and slightly faster (7.1%/year) since 2005.

The EU28 has met its indicative 21% target for renewable electricity in gross electricity consumption by 2010, as specified in the Renewable Electricity Directive (2001/77/EC). At Member State level, 14 EU-countries met their indicative national renewable electricity targets under that Directive.

From 2012, the Renewable Electricity Directive has been repealed by the Renewable Energy Directive (2009/28/EC), which establishes binding targets for Member States to meet a certain share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption by 2020 (see ENER 28).

[1] Gross (national) electricity consumption includes the total gross national electricity generation from all fuels (including auto-production), plus electricity imports, minus exports. Auto-production is defined as a natural or legal person generating electricity essentially for his/her own use. Gross electricity generation is measured at the outlet of the main transformers, i.e. it includes consumption in the plant auxiliaries and in transformers.

CSI032 Status of marine fish stocks (CSI 032/MAR 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/status-of-marine-fish-stocks-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/status-of-marine-fish-stocks-2/assessment Is the use of commercial fish stocks sustainable?

Approximately 60% of commercial fish landings comes from stocks that are assessed with Good Environmental Status (GES) information. Strong regional differences exist, where the Mediterranean and Black seas remain poorly assessed.

Around 58% of the assessed commercial stocks are not in GES. Only 12% are in GES for both the level of fishing mortality and reproductive capacity. These percentages also vary considerably between regional seas.

The use of commercial fish and shellfish stocks in Europe, therefore, remains largely unsustainable. Nevertheless, important signs of improvement for certain stocks are being recorded in the North-East Atlantic Ocean and Baltic Sea.

CSI033 Aquaculture production (CSI 033/MAR 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-production-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-production-3/assessment Is aquaculture production increasing?
  • Marine aquaculture production is increasing in Europe, mostly due to salmon production in Norway. Other types of production are relatively stable since the early 2000s. All aquaculture production in the EU-28 has been equally stable.
  • In 2012, by far the most cultivated species in Europe was Atlantic salmon, followed by mussels, rainbow trout, European sea bass, gilthead sea bream, oysters and carps, barbels and other cyprinids.
  • Finfish production accounts for the increase in European aquaculture, while shellfish production has been slowly decreasing since 1999. Aquatic plants production has been emerging since 2007.
CSI034 Fishing fleet pressure (CSI 034/MAR 009) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fishing-fleet-capacity-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fishing-fleet-capacity-2/assessment Is fishing pressure in European seas decreasing?

The EU fishing fleet displays strong regional differences in terms of its composition, but it is mostly made up of small vessels (59%). There has been a marked decrease in fishing fleet capacity (i.e. number of vessels) between 2004 and 2001, during which time small vessels decreased at an annual rate of approximately 1% and large vessels at 7% .

Most of the EU fishing effort is deployed by large vessels (74%) with mobile gears, of which the majority (61%) disturbs the seafloor. The decrease in capacity has been followed by a decrease in the effort of large vessels only (over 7% between 2004-2011), while the effort of small vessels has increased by approximately 5%. This is reflected in an overall shift towards gear with less impact on the seafloor.

The observed change of EU fishing effort and the shift towards gear with less impact is indicative of an overall decrease in fishing pressure and impact in European seas between 2004 and 2011.

CSI036 Freight transport demand (CSI 036/TERM 013) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demand-version-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demand-version-2/assessment-4 Is freight transport demand being decoupled from economic growth?

Freight transport volumes in the EU‑28 decreased by 2 % between 2011 and 2012, mainly due to a 3 % reduction in road freight transport (with Italy leading the road drop by 13.8 % compared to its 2011 figure). Rail transport also decreased by 4 % between 2011 and 2012, whereas IWW transport increased by 6 %. Maritime and air transport did not vary significantly. Overall, total freight transport volumes in the EU‑28 are now 10 % below the peak volumes experienced in 2007. The modal share remains constant; road transport dominates land freight transport at 75 %, followed by rail (18 %) and IWW (7 %).

Switzerland experienced a decrease of 4 % in road and rail transport, whereas Norway and Turkey’s overall land freight transport increased (by 4 % and 6 % respectively), and Iceland’s demand remained roughly constant between 2011 and 2012.

CSI037 Use of cleaner and alternative fuels (CSI 037/TERM 031) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-fuels http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-fuels/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-7 Is EU's progress towards promoting cleaner and alternative fuels satisfactory?

All EU Member States are to achieve a 10 % share in renewable energy by 2020 for all transport options. Individual Member States progress towards this
target varies. As a reference, the average share of renewable energy across the EU‑28 consumed in transport between 2010 and 2011 increased from 3.5 % to 3.8 %. These figures include only those biofuels which met the sustainability criteria.

In 2011 EUROSTAT has for the first time published the share of biofuels in transport energy use which meet the sustainability criteria of the Renewables Directive (Art. 17 & Art. 18, 2009/28/EC). The data shows that in 2011 3.8% of the energy consumed in transport was renewable, most of it from biofuels meeting the sustainability criteria. Most Member States require significant further increases in order to reach the Directive’s target for a 10% share of renewable energy in transport by 2020.

In 2011, the unweighted average EU-27 sulphur content was 5.7 ppm for petrol, and 7.0 ppm for diesel. An EU specification came into force on 1 January 2009, which limits the sulphur content of all automotive road fuels to a maximum of 10 ppm. Reductions in the sulphur content of fuels are expected to have a large impact on exhaust emissions as they will enable the introduction of more sophisticated after-treatment systems.

CSI040 Emissions of the main air pollutants in Europe (CSI 040/APE 010) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/main-anthropogenic-air-pollutant-emissions http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/main-anthropogenic-air-pollutant-emissions/assessment What progress is being made in reducing emissions of the main air pollutants across Europe?
  • Anthropogenic emissions of the main air pollutants decreased significantly in most EEA-33 member countries between 1990 and 2012:
    • Nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions decreased by 46% (51% in the EU-28);
    • Sulphur oxides (SOX) emissions decreased by 75% (84% in the EU-28);
    • Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) emissions decreased by 56% (60% in the EU-28);
    • Ammonia (NH3) emissions decreased by 24% (28% in the EU-28); and
    • Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions decreased by 35% (35% in the EU-28).
  • The EU-28 as a whole did not meet its 2010 target to reduce emissions of NOX. A further reduction of 2.2% from the 2010 emissions level is required to meet the interim environmental objectives set in the European Union’s 2001 National Emission Ceiling Directive (NECD).
  • The EU-28 met its continuing obligation to maintain emissions of SOX, NH3 and NMVOC below legally binding targets as specified by the NECD. A number of EU Member States reported emissions above their NECD emission ceilings: nine for NOX, three for NH3, and one for NMVOCs. There are no emission ceilings for primary PM2.5.
  • Three additional EEA member countries have emission ceilings for 2010 set in the Gothenburg Protocol under the 1979 UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland). All three countries met the SOx ceiling. Switzerland also met the ceilings for the other three pollutants. Liechtenstein exceeded the NMVOC ceiling. Norway breached two ceilings, for NH3 and for NOx.
CSI041 Waste generation (CSI 041/WST 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-generation-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-generation-1/assessment Is the generation of waste in Europe declining?

European economic production and consumption have become less waste intensive, even after the economic downturn since 2008 is considered in the analysis.

From the production side, waste generation from manufacturing in the EU-28 and Norway declined by 25% in absolute terms between 2004 and 2012, despite an increase of 7% in sectoral economic output. Waste generation by the service sector declined by 23% in the same period, despite an increase of 13% in sectoral economic output.

Turning to consumption, total municipal waste generation in EEA countries declined by 2% between 2004 and 2012, despite a 7% increase in real household expenditure.

One of the objectives in EU waste policy is to reduce waste generation in absolute terms, within the overall goal to decouple economic growth from resource use and environmental impacts. Waste prevention efforts across Europe seems to contribute to the waste objectives; with considerable differences between the countries. Wider analysis across different economic sectors within and beyond EU borders will be needed in order to provide more comprehensive conclusions.

ENER016 Final energy consumption by sector and fuel (CSI 027/ENER 016) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-by-sector-8 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-by-sector-8/assessment-2 Is final energy consumption decreasing in Europe?

Over the period 1990 and 2012 final energy consumption in EU28 increased by 2.3% (6.5% in EEA countries). Between 2005 and 2012 the final energy consumption in the EU28 decreased by 7.1% (5.0% in EEA countries). The services sector is the only sector where the energy consumption increased by 3.5% over the period 2005-2012. Between 2005 and 2012, the energy consumption dropped by 14% in industry, 5.1% in transport and 4% in households. The implementation of energy efficiency policies and the economic recession played an important part in the reduction of energy consumption. On average, each person in the EEA countries used 2.1 tonnes of oil equivalent to meet their energy needs in 2012.

ENER019 Efficiency of conventional thermal electricity and heat production (ENER 019) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/efficiency-of-conventional-thermal-electricity-generation-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/efficiency-of-conventional-thermal-electricity-generation-3/assessment Is the European energy production system becoming more efficient?

Between 1990 and 2012 the efficiency of electricity and heat production in public conventional thermal power plants in the EU28 improved from 42.2% in 1990 to 47.6% in 2012. In the non-EU EEA countries, this efficiency improved from 34.4% in 1990 to 42.1% in 2012. Between 2005 and 2012, the efficiency in public conventional thermal power plants stabilized more or less in both the EU28 and the non-EU EEA countries. An efficiency improvement in the EU28 of about 2 percentage points between 2005 and 2010 is attributed to an increased use of natural gas. Between 2010 an 2012 the efficiency in the EU28 dropped by the same amount, due to increased use of coal in stead of gas in combination with the use of existing, low efficiency coal plants.

The efficiency of electricity and heat production from autoproducers conventional thermal power plants in the EU and non-EU EEA countries decreased between 2005 and 2012 by about 5 percentage points, from about 60% in 2005 to about 55% in 2012.

ENER021 Final energy consumption intensity (ENER 021) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-intensity-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-intensity-3/assessment Has there been a decoupling between economic growth and final energy consumption in Europe?

Since 2000, the EU28 final energy intensity has decreased by 16% at an annual average rate of 2%/year. Since 2005, final energy intensity decreased by 11.9% at an annual rate of 1.8%/year, showing an absolute decoupling, between economic growth and final energy consumption. Since 2005, final energy intensity in industry, services and agriculture sectors decreased by 2.5%/year, 2.0%/year and 1.8%/year, respectively. In the transport sector the final energy intensity has decreased by 1.5%/year since 2005. In the household sector the final energy intensity decreased by 1.1%/year since 2005. Since 2000, the final energy intensity in non-EU EEA countries has decreased by 14% at an annual average rate of 2%/year. The annual decrease is slightly smaller than in the EU-28 due to an increase of the industry energy intensity in Turkey and Iceland.

ENER026 Primary energy consumption by fuel (CSI 029/ENER 026) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/primary-energy-consumption-by-fuel-5 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/primary-energy-consumption-by-fuel-5/assessment What are the trends concerning the energy mix in gross inland energy consumption Europe?

Primary energy consumption in EU 28 in 2012 was almost the same as in 1990 and amounted to 1585 Mtoe. Between 2005-2012, primary energy consumption in the EU28 decreased by 7.3% particularly due to the economic recession and energy efficiency improvements.

Primary energy consumption in the non-EU EEA countries doubled from 71 Mtoe in 1990 to 146 Mtoe in 2012. The main reason for the difference in the trend for this group of countries was the large increase in primary energy consumption in Turkey and, to a lesser extent, in Norway.

Fossil fuels (including non-renewable waste) continued to dominate primary energy consumption in EU28, but their share declined from 82.1% in 1990 to 73.9% in 2012. The share of renewable energy sources more than doubled over the period, from 4.5% in 1990 to 11.6% in 2012, increasing at an average annual rate of 4.4%/year. The share of nuclear energy in gross inland energy consumption increased slightly from 13.1% in 1990 to 14.4% in 2012.

ENER028 Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption (ENER 028) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-gross-final-energy-consumption-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-gross-final-energy-consumption-3/assessment What is the progress towards the EU’s 20% renewable energy consumption target for 2020?

The share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption in the EU28 reached 14.1% in 2012, representing 70% of the EU’s 20% renewable energy target for 2020. Renewable energy sources represented 15.6% of gross final energy consumption for heating and cooling, 23.5% of final electricity consumption and 5.1% of transport fuels consumption in 2012.

ENER030 Renewable electricity (CSI 031/ENER 030) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-electricity-consumption-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-electricity-consumption-1/assessment-2 What is the share of each renewable electricity source in gross electricity generation in Europe?

In 2012, the share of renewable electricity in gross electricity consumption[1] in the EU28 was 24.1%. Hydropower accounted for 11% of all electricity generation in 2012, followed by wind (6%), biomass and wastes (3%), solar power (2%), and geothermal and other renewables (2%). Overall, renewable electricity grew at an annual average rate of 4.1% since 1990, and slightly faster (7.1%/year) since 2005.

The EU28 has met its indicative 21% target for renewable electricity in gross electricity consumption by 2010, as specified in the Renewable Electricity Directive (2001/77/EC). At Member State level, 14 EU-countries met their indicative national renewable electricity targets under that Directive.

From 2012, the Renewable Electricity Directive has been repealed by the Renewable Energy Directive (2009/28/EC), which establishes binding targets for Member States to meet a certain share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption by 2020 (see ENER 28).

[1] Gross (national) electricity consumption includes the total gross national electricity generation from all fuels (including auto-production), plus electricity imports, minus exports. Auto-production is defined as a natural or legal person generating electricity essentially for his/her own use. Gross electricity generation is measured at the outlet of the main transformers, i.e. it includes consumption in the plant auxiliaries and in transformers.

ENER036 Overview of the European energy system (ENER 036) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/overview-of-the-european-energy-system-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/overview-of-the-european-energy-system-2/assessment Is the European energy system becoming more efficient?

The EU28 is still heavily dependent on fossil fuels, which accounted in 2012 for 74.6% of the total gross inland energy consumption compared to renewables at only 11%. The share of fossil fuels (gas, solid fuels and oil)[1] in the total gross inland energy consumption of the EU28 declined from 83.0% in 1990 to 74.6% in 2012. at an annual rate of 0.3 % per year. Between 2005 and 2012, the share of fossil fuels in gross inland energy consumption decreased slightly faster at 0.6 % per year.

The EU’s dependence on imports of fossil fuels from non-EU countries remained relatively stable between 2005 and 2012. In 2012, EU28 net import of fossil fuels was 53.4% of its total gross inland energy consumption with 58.2% for oil, 28.3% for gas and 13.6% for solid fuels.

In 2012 only 71.4% of the total gross inland energy consumption in the EU28 reached the end users. Between 1990 and 2012, energy losses in transformation and distribution were about 29% of total gross inland energy consumption and did not show a significant trend.

The average efficiency of electricity and heat production of conventional thermal power stations and district heating plants in the EU28 improved over the period 1990 and 2012 by 4.8 percentage points to reach 49.4% in 2012. The main increase was seen between 1990 and 2010 with an increase of 6.3 percentage points (from 44.6% in 1990 to 50.9% in 2010). The improvement before 2010 was due to the closure of old inefficient plants, improvements in existing technologies, often combined with a switch from coal power plants to more efficient combined cycle gas turbines. Between 2010 and 2012, there was a slight fall in the efficiency of electricity and heat production from conventional thermal power plants and district heating plants of 1.5 percentage points (from 50.9% in 2010 to 49.4% in 2012) because of increased power production from coal and lignite and due to lower heat production.

[1] Definitions are provided in the meta data.

ENER037 Progress on energy efficiency in Europe (ENER 037) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-on-energy-efficiency-in-europe-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-on-energy-efficiency-in-europe-2/assessment Is the final energy consumption becoming more efficient?

Over the period 1990-2012, final energy efficiency increased by 25% in EU28 countries at an annual average rate of 1.3%/year, driven by improvements in the industrial sector (1.7%/year) and households (1.5%/year). Half of the efficiency gains achieved through technological innovation in the household sector have been offset by increasing number of electrical appliances and larger homes. One third of total savings in space heating in the residential sector is due to new building codes, since a building built in 2012 consumed approximately 40% less energy than one built in 1990.  

Energy Trends in Europe

In 2012, the final energy consumption reached 1,104 Mtoe at EU-level (see also ENER 16). Buildings (households and services) consumed almost 40% of final energy consumption in 2012 (of which 26% for households), transport 32% (+6 points compared to 1990) followed by industry with 26% (-8 points compared to 1990) and agriculture with 2%.

LSI001 Land take (CSI 014/LSI 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/land-take-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/land-take-2/assessment-2 How much and in what proportions is agricultural, forest and other semi-natural and natural land being taken for urban and other artificial land development?

Land take by the expansion of residential areas and construction sites is the main cause of the increase in the coverage of urban land at the European level. Agricultural zones and, to a lesser extent, forests and semi-natural and natural areas, are disappearing in favour of the development of artificial surfaces. This affects biodiversity since it decreases habitats, the living space of a number of species, and fragments the landscapes that support and connect them. The annual land take in European countries assessed by 2006 Corine land cover project (EEA39 except Greece) was approximately 108 000 ha/year in 2000-2006. In 21 countries covered by both periods (1990-2000 and 2000-2006) the annual land take decreased by 9 % in the later period. The composition of land taken areas changed, too. More arable land and permanent crops and less pastures and mosaic farmland were taken by artificial development then in 1990-2000. Identified trends are expected to change little when next assessment for 2006-2012 becomes available in 2014.

LSI003 Progress in management of contaminated sites (CSI 015/LSI 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-sites-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-sites-3/assessment How is the problem of contaminated sites being addressed (clean-up of historical contamination and prevention of new contamination)?

Local soil contamination in 2011 was estimated at 2.5 million potentially contaminated sites in the EEA-39, of which about 45 % have been identified to date. About one third of an estimated total of 342 000 contaminated sites in the EEA-39 have already been identified and about 15 % of these 342 000 sites have been remediated. However, there are substantial differences in the underlying site definitions and interpretations that are used in different countries.

 

Four management steps are defined for the management and control of local soil contamination, namely site identification (or preliminary studies), preliminary investigations, main site investigations, and implementation of risk reduction measures. Progress with each of these steps provides evidence that countries are identifying potentially contaminated sites, verifying if these sites are actually contaminated and implementing remediation measures where these are required. Some countries have defined targets for the different steps.

 

Thirty of the 39 countries surveyed maintain comprehensive inventories for contaminated sites: 24 countries have central national data inventories, while six countries, namely Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Germany, Greece, Italy and Sweden, manage their inventories at the regional level. Almost all of the inventories include information on polluting activities, potentially contaminated sites and contaminated sites.

 

Contaminated soil continues to be commonly managed using “traditional” techniques, e.g. excavation and off-site disposal, which accounts for about one third of management practices. In-situ and ex-situ remediation techniques for contaminated soil are applied more or less equally.

 

Overall, the production sectors contribute more to local soil contamination than the service sectors, while mining activities are important sources of soil contamination in some countries. In the production sector, metal industries are reported as most polluting whereas the textile, leather, wood and paper industries are minor contributors to local soil contamination. Gasoline stations are the most frequently reported sources of contamination for the service sector.

 

The relative importance of different contaminants is similar for both liquid and solid matrices. The most frequent contaminants are mineral oils and heavy metals. Generally, phenols and cyanides make a negligible overall contribution to total contamination.

 

On average, 42 % of the total expenditure on the management of contaminated sites comes from public budgets. Annual national expenditures for the management of contaminated sites are on average about EUR 10.7 per capita. This corresponds to an average of 0.041 % of the national GDP. Around 81 % of the annual national expenditures for the management of contaminated sites is spent on remediation measures, while only 15 % is spent on site investigations.


It should be noted that all results derive from data provided by 27 (out of 39) countries that returned the questionnaire, and not all countries answered all questions.

LSI005 Soil organic carbon (CLIM 027/LSI 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-organic-carbon-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-organic-carbon-1/assessment What is the trend in soil organic carbon in Europe?
  • Soil carbon stocks in the EU-27 are around 75 billion tonnes of carbon; around 50 % of which is located in Ireland, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom (because of the large area of peatlands in these countries).
  • The largest emissions of CO2 from soils are due to conversion (drainage) of organic soils, and amount to 20–40 tonnes of CO2 per hectare per year. The most effective option to manage soil carbon in order to mitigate climate change is to preserve existing stocks in soils, and especially the large stocks in peat and other soils with a high content of organic carbon.
  • On average, soils in Europe are most likely to be accumulating carbon. Soils under grassland and forests are a carbon sink (estimated up to 80 million tonnes of carbon per year) whereas soils under arable land are a smaller carbon source (estimated from 10–40 million tonnes of carbon per year).
  • The effects of climate change on soil organic carbon and soil respiration are complex, and depend on distinct climatic and biotic drivers. However, they lack rigorous supporting datasets.
  • Climate change is expected to have an impact on soil carbon in the long term, but changes in the short term will more likely be driven by land management practices and land use change
LSI006 Soil erosion (CLIM 028/LSI 006) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-erosion-by-water-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/soil-erosion-by-water-1/assessment How are European soils affected by water and wind erosion?
  • 105 million ha., or 16 % of Europe’s total land area (excluding Russia) were estimated to be affected by water erosion in the 1990s.
  • Some 42 million ha. of land were estimated to be affected by wind erosion, of which around 1 million ha. were categorised as being severely affected.
  • A recent new model of soil erosion by water has estimated the surface area affected in the EU‐27 at 130 million ha. Almost 20 % is subjected to soil loss in excess of 10 tonnes/ha./year.
  • Increased variations in rainfall pattern and intensity will make soils more susceptible to water erosion, with off-site effects of soil erosion increasing.
  • Increased aridity will make finer-textured soils more vulnerable to wind erosion, especially if accompanied by a decrease in soil organic matter levels.
  • Reliable quantitative projections for soil erosion are not available.
LSI007 Soil moisture (CLIM 029/LSI 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-retention-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/water-retention-3/assessment How is soil moisture changing in Europe?
  • Soil moisture content is already being affected by rising temperatures and changes in precipitation amounts, both of which are evidence of changes in climate.
  • Since 1951, modelled soil moisture content significantly increased in parts of northern Europe and decreased in the Mediterranean region.
  • Projections for 2021–2050 show a general change in summer soil moisture content over most of Europe, including significant decreases in the Mediterranean region and increases in the northeastern part of Europe.
  • Maintaining water-retention capacity and porosity are important to reduce the impacts of intense rainfall and droughts, which are projected to become more frequent and severe.
  • The modelled results are based on natural factors and disregard artificial drainage and irrigation practices.
MAR001 Hazardous substances in marine organisms (MAR 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/hazardous-substances-in-marine-organisms http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/hazardous-substances-in-marine-organisms/hazardous-substances-in-marine-organisms-1 Are the concentrations and trends of hazardous substances in marine organisms acceptable?

In 2012, the concentrations of the eight assessed hazardous substances were generally: Low or Moderate for Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and lindane; Moderate for cadmium, mercury, lead, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and 6-Benzylaminopurine BAP; and Moderate or High for polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB). 

A general downward trend was found between 2003 and 2012 in the North-East Atlantic for cadmium, lead, lindane, PCB, DDT and BAP, and also in the Baltic Sea for lindane and PCB. No trends could be calculated for the other regional seas.

MAR002 Trends in marine non-indigenous species (MAR 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/trends-in-marine-alien-species-mas-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/trends-in-marine-alien-species-mas-2/assessment Are marine non-indigenous species increasing in European Seas?

Available data shows that the seas around Europe currently harbor 1 416 non-indigenous species (NIS), almost 81% (1 143) of which have been introduced after 1950. These consist mostly of invertebrates (approx. 63%).

The rate of new introductions of NIS is continually increasing with 323 new species recorded since 2000 at pan-European level.

An increase in NIS introductions is observed for all regional seas. The most affected seas are in the Mediterranean, in particular in the Aegean-Levantine Sea. In this region over 160 new species have been recorded from 2000 to 2010.

MAR003 Pathways of introduction of marine non-indigenous species (MAR 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/trends-in-marine-alien-species http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/trends-in-marine-alien-species/assessment What are the main pathways of introduction of marine non-indigenous species?

The main pathways for marine non-indigenous species (NIS) introduction in Europe´s seas are shipping (51%) and the Suez Canal (37%). These are followed by aquaculture related activities (17%) and, to a much lesser extent, aquarium trade (3%) and inland canals (2%). This is a pattern observed in all regional seas, except for the Eastern Mediterranean where introductions via the Suez Canal exceed those by shipping.

Trends in pathways show an increasing rate of introductions by shipping and corridors (in particular the Suez canal) since the 1990s, while aquaculture mediated introductions have been decreasing since the 2000s. This can be attributed to the adoption of effective EU regulation. Aquarium trade emerges as a lower but increasing pathway since the 2000s.

MAR005 Nutrients in transitional, coastal and marine waters (CSI 021/MAR 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and-3/assessment Are nutrient concentrations in European transitional, coastal and marine waters decreasing?

Between 1985 and 2012, most stations in European Seas that reported to the EEA showed no change in trends of concentrations of Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN) or orthophosphate. In addition, a decrease in concentrations was observed for 14% and 13% respectively, while only a minority of stations showed an increase.

These trends mostly refer to stations in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and Baltic Sea, however, due to lack of reported data for other regional seas. Available data shows nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations are decreasing in the southern North Sea which is an area with a recognised eutrophication problem. In the Baltic Sea, also affected by eutrophication, nitrogen concentrations are decreasing but phosphate concentrations show an increase at some stations. 

MAR006 Chlorophyll in transitional, coastal and marine waters (CSI 023/MAR 006) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/chlorophyll-in-transitional-coastal-and-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/chlorophyll-in-transitional-coastal-and-2/assessment Is eutrophication in European transitional, coastal and marine waters decreasing?
  • Between 1985 and 2012, 7% of all stations in European seas that reported to the EEA showed decreasing trends in summer chlorophyll concentrations, whereas in 4% of the stations, increasing trends were found. In the majority of the stations (89%), no trends were observed.
  • Based on available data, chlorophyll concentrations, which are an indicator of eutrophication, are decreasing in the Greater North Sea, Bay of Biscay and Adriatic Sea, but increasing in many parts of the Baltic Sea. No trend assessment was possible for the Black Sea.
MAR007 Status of marine fish stocks (CSI 032/MAR 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/status-of-marine-fish-stocks-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/status-of-marine-fish-stocks-2/assessment Is the use of commercial fish stocks sustainable?

Approximately 60% of commercial fish landings comes from stocks that are assessed with Good Environmental Status (GES) information. Strong regional differences exist, where the Mediterranean and Black seas remain poorly assessed.

Around 58% of the assessed commercial stocks are not in GES. Only 12% are in GES for both the level of fishing mortality and reproductive capacity. These percentages also vary considerably between regional seas.

The use of commercial fish and shellfish stocks in Europe, therefore, remains largely unsustainable. Nevertheless, important signs of improvement for certain stocks are being recorded in the North-East Atlantic Ocean and Baltic Sea.

MAR008 Aquaculture production (CSI 033/MAR 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-production-3 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-production-3/assessment Is aquaculture production increasing?
  • Marine aquaculture production is increasing in Europe, mostly due to salmon production in Norway. Other types of production are relatively stable since the early 2000s. All aquaculture production in the EU-28 has been equally stable.
  • In 2012, by far the most cultivated species in Europe was Atlantic salmon, followed by mussels, rainbow trout, European sea bass, gilthead sea bream, oysters and carps, barbels and other cyprinids.
  • Finfish production accounts for the increase in European aquaculture, while shellfish production has been slowly decreasing since 1999. Aquatic plants production has been emerging since 2007.
MAR009 Fishing fleet pressure (CSI 034/MAR 009) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fishing-fleet-capacity-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fishing-fleet-capacity-2/assessment Is fishing pressure in European seas decreasing?

The EU fishing fleet displays strong regional differences in terms of its composition, but it is mostly made up of small vessels (59%). There has been a marked decrease in fishing fleet capacity (i.e. number of vessels) between 2004 and 2001, during which time small vessels decreased at an annual rate of approximately 1% and large vessels at 7% .

Most of the EU fishing effort is deployed by large vessels (74%) with mobile gears, of which the majority (61%) disturbs the seafloor. The decrease in capacity has been followed by a decrease in the effort of large vessels only (over 7% between 2004-2011), while the effort of small vessels has increased by approximately 5%. This is reflected in an overall shift towards gear with less impact on the seafloor.

The observed change of EU fishing effort and the shift towards gear with less impact is indicative of an overall decrease in fishing pressure and impact in European seas between 2004 and 2011.

Outlook041 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - Outlook from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (Outlook 041) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/gdp-outlook-from-oecd-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/gdp-outlook-from-oecd-1/assessment What are the current and projected global trends in economic growth (GDP)?

Following the turbulence of the late 2000s, global GDP is projected to grow steadily up to 2050. Rapid growth is projected for China, with it overtaking the USA as the biggest single economy before 2020. India is also expected to grow rapidly surpassing the EU before 2050.

Outlook042 Population change – Outlook from UN DESA (Outlook 042) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/total-population-outlook-from-unstat-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/total-population-outlook-from-unstat-2/assessment What are the main population trends globally and within specific world regions?

The world’s population increased from 2.5 billion in 1950 to around 7 billion in 2010, and is expected to continue to rise until 2050/2100 under most UN projection variants. Assuming the ‘medium fertility’ projection variant, global population might increase to 9.6 billion by 2050, rising to 10.9 billion by 2100. However, if fertility and mortality rates stay at current levels (i.e. assuming the ‘no change’ projection variant), growth rates would be substantially higher, and the global population could rise to 10.2 billion by 2050 and 19.9 billion by 2100.

Expected global population growth is projected to be largely driven by increases in Asia and particularly in Africa. While the Asian population is expected to peak by 2050, Africa’s population is projected to grow strongly and continuously, from about 1 billion today to more than 4 billion by 2100, under ‘medium fertility’ assumptions.

The total population of the 28 EU Member States is projected to slightly increase from the current figure of 505 million to 520 million by 2030, and then to decrease in the subsequent decades to some 475 million by 2100, under ‘medium fertility’ assumptions. The age structure is projected to change substantially, with an increase of the share of people aged 65 years or older from the current figure of 17% to over 30% by 2050, under ‘medium fertility’ assumptions.

SCP013 Household expenditure on consumption categories with differing environmental pressure intensities (SCP 013) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/trends-in-share-of-expenditure-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/trends-in-share-of-expenditure-1/assessment Are Europeans switching consumption patterns to goods and services with less environmental pressures per Euro?

Between 1996 and 2012, trends in household spending patterns were mixed. The trend, however, is towards an increasing share of consumption categories with reduced environmental pressures per Euro spent. In addition, almost all consumption categories have also seen reductions in environmental pressure intensities. Together, these two developments are likely to have caused a relative decoupling of environmental pressures from growth in household consumption expenditure.

SCP033 Number of organisations with registered environmental management systems according to EMAS and ISO 14001 (SCP 033) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/number-of-organisations-with-registered http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/number-of-organisations-with-registered/assessment Are private companies and public institutions increasingly engaging in environmental management and corporate social responsibility?

The number of organisations registered under the EMAS standard rose by 50% during the period 2003-2010, while organisations from EU countries certified according to the international ISO 14001 standard more than quadrupled in the period 2001-2009. This indicates that private companies and public institutions in the EU are increasingly engaging in environmental management.

SEBI001 Abundance and distribution of selected species (SEBI 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/abundance-and-distribution-of-selected-species http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/abundance-and-distribution-of-selected-species/abundance-and-distribution-of-selected-2 Have the declines in common species in Europe been halted?

Since 1990, common bird populations have decreased by around 12% in 27 European countries.  The decline of common farmland birds was more pronounced at 30%, whereas common forest birds declined by 8%.

Grassland butterflies have also declined dramatically (50%) since 1990 in 19 European countries and this reduction shows no sign of levelling off.

SEBI002 Red List Index for European species (SEBI 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/red-list-index-for-european-species http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/red-list-index-for-european-species/red-list-index-for-european Has the risk of extinction for European birds changed?

To date, the Red List Index has been calculated only for bird species at a European level, so the information in the current indicator is limited to European birds.
The overall risk of extinction among Europe's birds has generally been on the rise over the last decade. While the status of some species has due to conservation action, many more have deteriorated because of worsening threats and/or declining populations.

SEBI003 Species of European interest (SEBI 003/CSI 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-of-european-interest http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/species-of-european-interest/species-of-european-interest-assessment What is the conservation status of species of Community interest? Around half of the species of Community interest (those species which, within the territory of the European Union are listed in Annexes II, IV and V of the Habitats Directive) have an unfavourable conservation status, with variation across biogeographic regions (1).
There are still significant gaps in knowledge, especially for marine species.

(1)
The reporting format uses three classes of Conservation Status. 'Good' (green) signifies that the species or habitat is at Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) as defined in the Directive and the habitat or species can be expected to prosper without any change to existing management or policies. In addition, two classes of 'Unfavourable' are recognised: 'Unfavourable-Bad' (red) signifies that the habitat or species is in serious danger of becoming extinct (at least locally) and 'Unfavourable-Inadequate' (amber) is used for situations where a change in management or policy is required but the danger of extinction is not so high. The unfavourable category has been split into two classes to allow improvements or deterioration to be reported. (Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines DRAFT 2 January 2006).
SEBI004 Ecosystem coverage (SEBI 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ecosystem-coverage-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ecosystem-coverage-1/assessment-1 Which changes are occurring in the area of Europe's ecosystems?

Between 2000 and 2006 the highest absolute increase in ecosystem coverage occurred in transitional woodland, mostly at the expense of woodland and forest. A decrease was observed in vulnerable ecosystems such as wetlands, heathland and sparsely vegetated land. Agricultural land coverage also decreased, with the majority of changes caused by urbanisation and intensification of agriculture, affecting, particularly, grassland and agricultural mosaics.  Urban areas continued to increase dramatically. Rivers, lakes and coastal areas increased to a minor extent.

 

SEBI005 Habitats of European interest (SEBI 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/habitats-of-european-interest http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/habitats-of-european-interest/habitats-of-european-interest-assessment What is the conservation status of habitats of Community interest?

 Conservation status(1) is quite variable across the regions. A relatively large proportion of habitats (35 %) have a favourable status in the Alpine region but the situation is much worse in the Atlantic region where more than 70 % have an unfavourable status.That means their range and quality are in decline or do not meet the specified quality criteria.
There are still significant gaps in knowledge on marine areas, except for the Baltic.

(1) The reporting format uses three classes of conservation status. 'Good' (green) indicates that the species or habitat is at Favourable Conservation Status as defined in the Directive and the habitat or species can be expected to prosper without any change to existing management or policies. Two classes of 'Unfavourable' are also recognised. 'Unfavourable-Bad' (red) signifies that a habitat or species is in serious danger of becoming extinct (at least locally) and 'Unfavourable-Inadequate' (amber) is used for situations where a change in management or policy is required but the danger of extinction is not so high. The unfavourable category has been split into two classes to allow improvements or deterioration to be reported. (Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines DRAFT 2 January 2006).

SEBI006 Livestock genetic diversity (SEBI 006) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/livestock-genetic-diversity http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/livestock-genetic-diversity/livestock-genetic-diversity-assessment-published Are fewer livestock breeds being used in Europe? In several countries, populations of native breeds, although generally well adapted to local circumstances and resources, remain in critically low numbers, being replaced by a few and widespread highly productive breeds, introduced for this purpose. The fact that native breeds make up only a small part of the total population, and that a high percentage of native breeds are endangered(1) indicates a risk of loss of biodiversity. Although data are available for only a few countries, these indicate that many native cattle breeds are endangered. The situation for sheep is also problematic. Overall, the situation is stable but negative.

(1) According to FAO, an endangered breed is assessed on quantitative criteria as the total number of breeding females or the overall population size and the percentage of purebred females. Here, however, each country has its own interpretation.
SEBI007 Nationally designated protected areas (SEBI 007) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nationally-designated-protected-areas http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nationally-designated-protected-areas/nationally-designated-protected-areas-assessment-3 What is the progress with the national designation of protected areas as a tool for biodiversity conservation?

The total area of nationally-designated protected areas in Europe[1] has increased over time and amounted to over 1,1 million square kilometres in 39 European countries in 2014. With more than 95 000 sites, Europe still has more protected areas than any other region in the world.

The total area of nationally designated protected areas currently covers about 21% of terrestrial territory and inland waters, although further expansion of the marine network is required to meet targets.

[1] A “Nationally designated area” is an area designated by a national designation instrument based on national legislation. If a country has included the sites designated under the EU Birds and Habitats directive in its legislation, the Natura 2000 sites of this country are included in the figure.



 

SEBI008 Sites designated under the EU Habitats and Birds Directives (SEBI 008) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sites-designated-under-the-eu-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/sites-designated-under-the-eu-1/assessment What progress has there been in the implementation of the Habitats and Birds Directives?

Since 2002, there has been a steady increase in the cumulative area of the Natura 2000 network. Sites of Community Importance (SCIs) increased in coverage from 450 000 to 810 000 square kilometres and Special Protected Areas (SPAs) increased from approximately 180 000 to 670 000 square kilometres. Ten countries have designated more than 20% of their territory.

SEBI009 Critical load exceedance for nitrogen (SEBI 009) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/critical-load-exceedance-for-nitrogen http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/critical-load-exceedance-for-nitrogen/critical-load-exceedance-for-nitrogen What are the trends in nitrogen emissions and where in Europe does atmospheric nitrogen deposition threaten biodiversity? Nitrogen emissions and deposition of nitrogen compounds have decreased since 1990 but relatively little compared to sulphur emissions. Agriculture and transport are the main sources of nitrogen pollution (EEA, 2007c). In addition, nitrogen components can lead to eutrophication of ecosystems. When this pollution exceeds certain levels ('critical load'), it is damaging to biodiversity. Critical load exceedance is still significant(1).

(1) The critical load of nutrient nitrogen is defined as 'the highest deposition of nitrogen as NOX and/or NHY below which harmful effects in ecosystem structure and function do not occur according to present knowledge' (ICP, M&M, 2004).
SEBI010 Invasive alien species in Europe (SEBI 010) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/invasive-alien-species-in-europe http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/invasive-alien-species-in-europe/invasive-alien-species-in-europe Is the number of alien species in Europe increasing? Which invasive alien species should be targeted by management actions? (5)

The cumulative number of alien species introduced has been constantly increasing since the 1900s . While the increase may be slowing down or levelling off for terrestrial and freshwater species, this is certainly not the case for marine and estuarine species. A relatively constant proportion of the alien species establishedcause significant damage to native biodiversity, i.e. can be classified as invasive alien species according to the Convention on Biological Diversity. This increase in the number of alien species established thus implies a growing potential risk of damage to native biodiversity caused by invasive alien species.

While the majority of the approximately 10 000 alien species recorded in Europe (DAISIE project) have not (yet) been found to have major impacts, some are highly invasive. To identify the most problematic species to help prioritise monitoring, research and management actions, a list of 'Worst invasive alien species threatening biodiversity in Europe' (15), presently comprising 163 species/species groups, has been established.

While invasive alien species are recognised as a major driver of biodiversity loss, the issue of 'alien species' may in the future need to be considered in the context of climate change and particularly adaptation. For example, as agricultural food production adapts to a changing climate, farmers may welcome the arrival of pollinator species that match the new plant varieties that are used. Indeed, the movement of plant and animal species together may be necessary to facilitate adaptation.

(5) A species, subspecies or lower taxon, introduced outside its natural past or present distribution; includes any part, gametes, seeds, eggs or propagules of such species that might survive and subsequently reproduce. An invasive alien species is an alien species whose introduction and/or spread threaten biological diversity www.cbd.int/invasive/terms.shtml, accessed on 2 December 2008).

(15) Based on expert opinion in the SEBI 2010 expert group on invasive alien species.

SEBI011 Impact of climate change on bird populations (SEBI 011) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/impact-of-climate-change-on http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/impact-of-climate-change-on/impact-of-climate-change-on What are the negative (and positive) impacts of climate change on biodiversity?

Climate change is having a detectable effect on bird populations at a European scale, including both negative and positive effects.

The number of bird species whose populations are observed to be negatively impacted by climatic change is three times larger than those observed to be positively affected by climate warming in this set of widespread European land birds.

The Climatic Impact Indicator, which illustrates the impact of climate change on bird populations, has increased strongly in the past twenty years, coinciding with a period of rapid climatic warming in Europe. Potential links between changes in bird populations and ecosystem functioning and resilience are not well understood.

SEBI012 Marine trophic index of European seas (SEBI 012) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/marine-trophic-index-of-european-seas http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/marine-trophic-index-of-european-seas/marine-trophic-index-of-european What is the impact of existing fisheries and maritime policies on the health of fish stocks in European seas?

In the majority of European seas, the Marine Trophic Index (MTI) has been declining since the mid - 1950s, which means that populations of predatory fishes decline to the benefit of smaller fish and invertebrates.

SEBI013 Fragmentation of natural and semi-natural areas (SEBI 013) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fragmentation-of-natural-and-semi http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fragmentation-of-natural-and-semi/fragmentation-of-natural-and-semi Are European natural/semi-natural lands becoming more fragmented? Are forest landscapes becoming more fragmented?

European ecosystems are literally cut to pieces by urban sprawl together with a rapidly expanding transport network. The increase of mixed natural landscape patterns due to the spread of artificial and agricultural areas into what used to be core natural and semi-natural landscapes is more significant in south-western Europe.

Fragmentation is in many places caused by forest harvesting and has a dynamic and cyclic nature but in south-western Europe, losses towards agricultural and artificial surfaces are more frequent. In the period 1990 - 2000 the connectivity for forest species was stable in approximately half of Europe's territory and increasing or decreasing slightly for another 40 %. The decrease was significant in about 5% of provinces spread in Denmark, France, the Iberian Peninsula, Ireland and Lithuania.

SEBI015 Nutrients in transitional, coastal and marine waters (SEBI 015) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and-1/nutrients-in-transitional-coastal-and What is the status of transitional, marine and coastal waters in Europe?

In countries that reported data, 85 % of stations reported no changes in oxidised nitrogen levels in transitional, coastal and marine waters in the period 1985 - 2005 and 82 % reported no change for orthophosphate. At stations that identified changes, decreases were more common than increases.

SEBI016 Freshwater quality (SEBI 016) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freshwater-quality http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freshwater-quality/freshwater-quality-assessment-published-may-2010 What is the status of freshwater quality in Europe?

Pollution of rivers with organic matter and ammonium is decreasing as are the levels of other anthropogenic nutrients in freshwater generally (rivers, lakes and groundwater). This reduces stress on freshwater biodiversity and improves ecological status.

SEBI017 Forest: growing stock, increment and fellings (SEBI 017) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/forest-growing-stock-increment-and-fellings http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/forest-growing-stock-increment-and-fellings/forest-growing-stock-increment-and-4 Is forestry in Europe sustainable in terms of the balance between increment of growing stock and felling?

The ratio of felling to increment is relatively stable and remains under 80% for most of the countries across Europe. This utilisation rate has allowed the forest stock to increase.

SEBI019 Agriculture: nitrogen balance (SEBI 019) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-nitrogen-balance http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-nitrogen-balance/agriculture-nitrogen-balance-assessment-published Is the nitrogen surplus from agriculture being reduced?

Agricultural nitrogen surpluses (the difference between all nutrient inputs and outputs on agricultural land) show a declining trend, thereby potentially reducing environmental pressures on soil, water and air. Many countries, however, still maintain a large surplus.

SEBI020 Agriculture: area under management practices potentially supporting biodiversity (SEBI 020) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-area-under-management-practices http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-area-under-management-practices/agriculture-area-under-management-practices-2 To what extent is European agriculture geared towards the prevention of biodiversity loss?

Europe has considerable areas of High Nature Value (HNV) farmland, which provide habitats for a wide range of species. Such areas are under threat, however, from both the intensification of farming and land abandonment. The mere presence of HNV farmland is not proof of sustainable management but promoting conservation and sustainable farming practices in these areas is crucial for biodiversity.

Organic farming has developed rapidly since the beginning of the 1990s and continues to do so. Between 2002 and 2011, the total area under organic agriculture in the EU-27 increased by 6% per year and in 2011 amounted to an estimated 5.4% of the utilised agricultural area (UAA) (EC, 2013).

SEBI021 Fisheries: European commercial fish stocks (SEBI 021) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fisheries-european-commercial-fish-stocks http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fisheries-european-commercial-fish-stocks/fisheries-european-commercial-fish-stocks What is the status of European commercial fish stocks? Of the assessed European commercial stocks, about 45 % are outside safe biological limits(1).

(1) A stock is considered to be outside 'Safe Biological Limits' (SBL) when the Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) (the mature part of a stock) is below a biomass precautionary approach reference point (Bpa), or when fishing mortality (F) (an expression of the proportion of a stock that is removed by fishing activities in a year) exceeds a fishing mortality precautionary approach reference point (Fpa), or when both conditions exist.

SEBI022 Aquaculture: effluent water quality from finfish farms (SEBI 022) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-effluent-water-quality-from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/aquaculture-effluent-water-quality-from/aquaculture-effluent-water-quality-from What are the main trends in aquaculture across Europe?

Aquaculture production in Europe has increased in the EU since 1990, levelling off slightly since 2000 although Norway and Iceland continue to show large increases. This overall increase implies a rise in pressure on adjacent water bodies and associated ecosystems resulting mainly from nutrient releasefrom aquaculture facilities. Annual production in the current version of the indicator is a proxy for the environmental impacts of aquaculture. Work is underway to develop a more advanced indicator to assess the sustainability of aquaculture.

SEBI023 Ecological footprint of European countries (SEBI 023) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ecological-footprint-of-european-countries http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/ecological-footprint-of-european-countries/ecological-footprint-of-european-countries-2 Are Europeans using more than their share of the world's resources?

The total ecological footprint for the EU-28 countries increased rapidly during the 1960s and 70s, and has remained relatively constant since the 1980s. The region’s total biocapacity, however, has changed very little since 1961. The picture is similar for the EEA-33 countries.

The pan-European ecological footprint has been increasing almost constantly since 1961, while biocapacity(1) has decreased. This results in an ever larger deficit, with negative consequences for the environment within and outside Europe.


(1) The capacity of ecosystems to produce useful biological materials and to absorb waste materials generated by humans, using current management schemes and extraction technologies.

SEBI024 Patent applications based on genetic resources (SEBI 024) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/patent-applications-based-on-genetic-resources http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/patent-applications-based-on-genetic-resources/patent-applications-based-on-genetic What share of European patents is biodiversity-related?

Biodiversity has served as a major resource for patent activity across a wide swathe of science and technology sectors ranging from agriculture to cosmetics, functional foods, traditional medicines, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and emerging developments such as synthetic biology. About 9 % of European patent activity relates to biodiversity, rising to 16 % if the full spectrum of pharmaceutical activity is included. After rapid growth, patent activity for biodiversity now shows a declining trend.

The decrease from 2005 seen in Figure 1 is due to the time lag between the filing of a patent and its publication (2 years and more). This means that for recent years, the data may not yet be in the database (see Oldham and Hall, 2009). Additional work is required to link the data with wider economic and geographical information.

SEBI025 Financing biodiversity management (SEBI 025) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/financing-biodiversity-management http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/financing-biodiversity-management/financing-biodiversity-management-assessment-published How much public funds are being committed to conservation of biodiversity?

This indicator currently has a limited scope and only contains information from EU funding of projects using the LIFE financial instrument for the environment. The amount of the EU contribution per LIFE project varies significantly among Member States. Newer Member States tend to spend less money through the LIFE Nature programme (with a small number of notable exceptions). Further detail is required (e.g. on project size) in order to interpret these figures. The LIFE Nature project represents a very small proportion of the total EU budget.
European funding benefiting biodiversity may also be 'hidden' in budget lines within other policy areas, such as agriculture, rural development and research. Finally, the indicator currently does not show national funding for biodiversity.

SEBI026 Public awareness (SEBI 026) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/public-awareness http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/public-awareness/public-awareness-assessment-published-may-1 What is the level of public awareness about biodiversity in Europe? Are people willing to take action?

Understanding and awareness of biodiversity have increased slightly since 2007. Citizens are also more aware of the threats and challenges facing biodiversity, but change in levels of awareness is slow. In 2013, more than two-thirds of EU citizens had heard of biodiversity, but only 44% know the meaning of the word. This is, however, 10% more than in 2007.

62% of EU citizens (against 58% in 2010) very much agree that it is important to halt biodiversity loss because our well-being and quality of life is based upon nature and biodiversity (TNS, 2013).

TERM004 Exceedances of air quality objectives due to traffic (TERM 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exceedances-of-air-quality-objectives http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exceedances-of-air-quality-objectives/exceedances-of-air-quality-objectives-5 Is the contribution of the transport sector to air quality reducing?

The data analysed from selected stations in major urban agglomerations indicate that during the period 1999-2008 mean values of NO2 concentrations at road traffic stations remain relatively stable (trend is smaller than the statistical uncertainty on estimate). An increase is observed after 2003 in the maximum observed concentrations and although a slight reduction is observed in 2007, a further increase is noted in 2008. The background concentrations remain relatively stable throughout the period 1999-2008. For PM10, a slight increase was observed in 2003 in the maximum background concentrations, but these have followed a downward trend since. The trend in the maximum PM10 concentration at traffic stations varies during the period 2002-2008, with a downward trend observed between 2002-2004, an increase in 2006 and a downward trend thereafter. Throughout the period 2002-2007 mean traffic and mean background concentrations remain relatively stable, with a slight downward trend observed in recent years.

TERM013 Freight transport demand (CSI 036/TERM 013) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demand-version-2 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demand-version-2/assessment-4 Is freight transport demand being decoupled from economic growth?

Freight transport volumes in the EU‑28 decreased by 2 % between 2011 and 2012, mainly due to a 3 % reduction in road freight transport (with Italy leading the road drop by 13.8 % compared to its 2011 figure). Rail transport also decreased by 4 % between 2011 and 2012, whereas IWW transport increased by 6 %. Maritime and air transport did not vary significantly. Overall, total freight transport volumes in the EU‑28 are now 10 % below the peak volumes experienced in 2007. The modal share remains constant; road transport dominates land freight transport at 75 %, followed by rail (18 %) and IWW (7 %).

Switzerland experienced a decrease of 4 % in road and rail transport, whereas Norway and Turkey’s overall land freight transport increased (by 4 % and 6 % respectively), and Iceland’s demand remained roughly constant between 2011 and 2012.

TERM018 Capacity of infrastructure networks (TERM 018) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/capacity-of-infrastructure-networks http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/capacity-of-infrastructure-networks/capacity-of-infrastructure-networks-assessment Is the existing infrastructure capacity being optimised? Are we optimising the use of existing transport infrastructure capacity and moving towards a better-balanced intermodal transport system?
  • During the last decade, the total length of Europe's motorway network, High Speed Rail (HSR) network, inland waterways and pipelines have increased. However, the total length of the conventional rail network has decreased.
  • While infrastructure length is only a proxy measure for capacity, the steady increase in the length of the motorway infrastructure between 1990 and 2008 suggests that road capacity has expanded to the detriment of conventional rail. The data may not show the full extent of the divergence as motorway length may have increased even more than noted since additional lanes are not counted in the statistics (see the Definitions Section) and the rail network may have decreased further through reducing double track to single or reducing signalling spacing, which statistics do not show. The data shows that the negative effect is bigger for the new Member States (EU-12) than for the EU-15 countries. For example, the length of rail infrastructure, fell much more in the EU-12 than in the EU-15 during this time period.
  • Increasing infrastructure capacity is not always necessary. Optimization of the capacity of the existing infrastructure through interconnectivity, interoperability, intermodality and road pricing still has lots of potential throughout Europe. The application of these principles might be more beneficial to society and definitely to the environment than the construction of new infrastructure when capacity and congestion problems arise.
TERM019 Transport infrastructure investments (TERM 019) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/infrastructure-investments http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/infrastructure-investments/assessment Are we giving investment priority to environmentally friendly transport systems?

Spending on transport infrastructure has increased over the decade to 2008  for the 20 Member States included in the EEA-32 analysis, both in absolute terms and as a proportion of GDP. Road infrastructure continues to receive the majority of investment, and although other modes of transport (rail, sea and air) have increased their share of investment overall in the last decade, the most recent five years have seen a return to increasing proportions of investment in road infrastructure. The EU-12 Member States have seen proportionally much greater rises in the level of transport investment than the EU-15 Member States in all modes except sea transport infrastructure. Overall investment in transport infrastructure grew by almost 3% in 2007-2008 for the EEA-32 Member States included in the analysis, despite a general economic recession and reduction in transport activity in that year.

TERM020 Real change in transport prices by mode (TERM 020) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/real-change-in-transport-prices http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/real-change-in-transport-prices/assessment Are passenger transport prices increasing at a higher rate than consumer prices? Are transport prices givin appropriate signals to transport users?

On average over the period 1998 to 2009, passenger transport prices have increased at a higher rate than consumer prices. However, in 1998, 2001 and now again in 2009, the relative volatility of the transport market has been highlighted, as overall transport prices  fell at a faster rate than consumer prices.  This is primarily due to significant drop in the average crude oil price between 2008 and 2009, which led to reductions in fuel prices. In particular, 2009 saw a decline in prices for air passenger transport and the operation of personal transport equipment, both of which increased in the previous year. In addition, the purchase price of motor cars continued the downward trend that has been consistent over the past decade. For freight transport prices, no EU-wide data exists, but as an example UK road freight prices have increased by a small amount over this period; transport of goods into the UK by sea have continually declined as economies of scale continue to take effect (larger ships travelling longer distances).

TERM021 Fuel prices (TERM 021) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fuel-prices-and-taxes http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/fuel-prices-and-taxes/assessment-3 Are fuel prices sending the appropriate signals?

 Since 1980 the real price of transport fuel (all transport fuels, expressed as the equivalent consumption in unleaded petrol, corrected for inflation to 2005 prices) has fluctuated between EUR 0.75 and 1.25 per litre, with an average of EUR 0.96. Real prices per litre peaked in July 2008 at around EUR 1.25, but then fell by around a third later that year, largely due to a significant drop in the price of crude oil. Another peak occurred in April 2012 when fuel prices reached EUR 1.24. Since then fuel prices have fallen again. The average real price in May 2013 was EUR 1.14 – still significantly above the long term average of EUR 0.96. The price of fuel is an important determinant of the demand for transport and the efficiency with which fuel is used. However, despite rising real prices over the last two decades transport demand increased.

TERM027 Energy efficiency and specific CO2 emissions (TERM 027) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/energy-efficiency-and-specific-co2-emissions http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/energy-efficiency-and-specific-co2-emissions/energy-efficiency-and-specific-co2-5 Are the various passenger and freight transport modes becoming more energy efficient?
  • Specific CO2 emissions of road transport have decreased since 1995, mainly due to an improvement in the fuel efficiency of passenger car transport. Recent EU Regulation setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars is expected to further reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles in view of the 130 g/km and 95 g/km emission targets set for 2015 and 2020 respectively.
  • Specific CO2 emissions of air transport, although decreasing, are of the same order of magnitude as for road, while rail and maritime shipping remain the most energy efficient modes of passenger transport.
  • Specific energy efficiency of light and heavy duty trucks has improved, but road transport still consumes significantly more energy per t-km than rail or ship freight transport. CO2 emissions from light commercial vehicles are also expected to decrease in view of the 175 g/km and 147 g/km emission targets set for 2017 and 2020 respectively.
TERM028 Specific air pollutant emissions (TERM 028) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/specific-air-pollutant-emissions http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/specific-air-pollutant-emissions/specific-air-pollutant-emissions-assessment-3 Is the reduction in specific emissions consistent with the stricter emission standards?
  • The specific emissions of air pollutants from passenger and freight transport decreased during the time period 1995-2009 for the majority of transport modes and especially for passenger transport.
  • The highest reduction of specific emissions can be observed in the road sector, following the implementation of increasingly strict emission standards.
  • Railway and aviation have also recorded reductions, while maritime passenger and freight transport emissions remained approximately constant over the same time period.
  • Rail and water transport are still relatively clean forms of transport - compared to road and air transport - but without any regulations on their emissions, these modes might lose this leading position.
TERM030 Load factors for freight transport (TERM 030) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/load-factors-for-freight-transport http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/load-factors-for-freight-transport/load-factors-for-freight-transport-1 Are freight vehicles making full use of available capacity?

For countries where data is available (Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK), load factors have generally declined for road freight transport (Figure 1). Load factors are generally under 50 % (by weight). However some freight transport companies achieve much higher load factors than others in the same sector. This suggests that load factors can be improved. Road freight empty running (Figure 2) shows increases and decreases across different countries, although it is important to note that the response rate for the two variables is different (fewer and/or different countries have reported empty running). If load factors were increased, freight traffic volumes could be considerably reduced.
Rail freight load factors (Figure 3) have remained fairly constant across the last few years, with only small increases and decreases observed for individual countries. There is limited data available for shipping freight, and this shows increasing load factors for the Czech Republic and Lithuania, and slight decreases for Hungary and Poland (Figure 4).

TERM031 Use of cleaner and alternative fuels (CSI 037/TERM 031) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-fuels http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-fuels/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-7 Is EU's progress towards promoting cleaner and alternative fuels satisfactory?

All EU Member States are to achieve a 10 % share in renewable energy by 2020 for all transport options. Individual Member States progress towards this
target varies. As a reference, the average share of renewable energy across the EU‑28 consumed in transport between 2010 and 2011 increased from 3.5 % to 3.8 %. These figures include only those biofuels which met the sustainability criteria.

In 2011 EUROSTAT has for the first time published the share of biofuels in transport energy use which meet the sustainability criteria of the Renewables Directive (Art. 17 & Art. 18, 2009/28/EC). The data shows that in 2011 3.8% of the energy consumed in transport was renewable, most of it from biofuels meeting the sustainability criteria. Most Member States require significant further increases in order to reach the Directive’s target for a 10% share of renewable energy in transport by 2020.

In 2011, the unweighted average EU-27 sulphur content was 5.7 ppm for petrol, and 7.0 ppm for diesel. An EU specification came into force on 1 January 2009, which limits the sulphur content of all automotive road fuels to a maximum of 10 ppm. Reductions in the sulphur content of fuels are expected to have a large impact on exhaust emissions as they will enable the introduction of more sophisticated after-treatment systems.

TERM032 Size of the vehicle fleet (TERM 032) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/size-of-the-vehicle-fleet http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/size-of-the-vehicle-fleet/size-of-the-vehicle-fleet-2 Is the vehicle fleet expanding?
  • The level of car ownership is growing rapidly in the EEA-32 countries, especially in countries with relatively low car ownership levels, like the new EU Member States (EU-12). Increasing private vehicle ownership has proven to lead to increased usage of private vehicles and might have the opposite effect on public transport usage in the future. The number of buses-coaches per capita has increased slightly in the period 1995 to 2009.
  • The number of trucks per unit of GDP (truck intensity) has remained constant over the same period and is generally higher in the new EU Member States (EU-12) than in the older ones (EU-15).
TERM033 Average age of the vehicle fleet (TERM 033) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/average-age-of-the-vehicle-fleet http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/average-age-of-the-vehicle-fleet/average-age-of-the-vehicle-3 Does the vehicle fleet replacement result in a reduction of the average age?
  • The average age of road vehicles has recorded small changes during the period from 1995 to 2009.
  • The average age of passenger cars, two-wheelers, buses and coaches slightly decreased, while the average age of light and heavy-duty vehicles increased.
  • The registration of new vehicles has increased over the same period, suggesting that the penetration rate of modern technologies is accelerating.
TERM034 Proportion of vehicle fleet meeting certain emission standards (TERM 034) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/proportion-of-vehicle-fleet-meeting http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/proportion-of-vehicle-fleet-meeting/proportion-of-vehicle-fleet-meeting-6 Is the environmental performance of the vehicle fleet improving?
  • Estimates based on the share of vehicles complying with the various legislation classes suggest that despite the strict emission limits imposed for new vehicles in Europe, a considerable fraction of the vehicle fleet is still of conventional (pre-Euro) technology.
  • The period of time needed for a new technology to penetrate the vehicle fleet in the EEA is quicker for diesel than for petrol cars.
  • The proportion of trucks, buses and coaches that comply with the latest and most stringent emission standards is lower than for cars, because of their longer lifetimes. On the other hand, the penetration of new technology is highest for two-wheelers.
  • Based on the activity level of the latest technologies, which is generally higher compared to the activity level of older vehicles, the emissions reductions achieved by the entire fleet are higher than the technology share may suggest.
WAT001 Use of freshwater resources (CSI 018/WAT 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-freshwater-resources http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-freshwater-resources/use-of-freshwater-resources-assessment-2 Is the abstraction rate of water sustainable?

Over the last 10-17 years the Water Exploitation Index (WEI) decreased in 24 EEA countries (Fig.1), as a result of water saving and water efficiency measures.
Total water abstraction decreased about 12 %, but one fifth  of Europe's population still lives in water-stressed countries (approx. 113 million inhabitants).

WAT002 Oxygen consuming substances in rivers (CSI 019/WAT 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers-7 Is organic matter and ammonium pollution of rivers decreasing?

Concentrations of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total ammonium have decreased in European rivers in the period 1992 to 2012 (Fig. 1), mainly due to general improvement in waste water treatment.

WAT003 Nutrients in freshwater (CSI 020/WAT 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-freshwater http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/nutrients-in-freshwater/nutrients-in-freshwater-assessment-published-6 Are concentrations of nutrients in our freshwaters decreasing?
  • Since 2005, average nitrate concentrations in European groundwater have declined and in 2011, the mean concentration had almost returned to the 1992 level.
  • The average nitrate concentration in European rivers declined by 0.03 milligrams per liter of nitrogen (mg N/l) (0.8%) per year over the period 1992 to 2012.
  • The decline in nitrate concentration reflects the effect of measures to reduce agricultural inputs of nitrate, as well as improvements in wastewater treatment.
  • Average orthophosphate concentration in European rivers has decreased markedly over the last two decades (0.003 milligrams per liter of phosphorous (mg P/l) or 2.1% per year).
  • Also, average lake phosphorus concentration decreased over the period 1992-2012 (0.0004 mg P/l, or 0.8% per year).
  • The decrease in phosphorus concentration reflects both improvements in wastewater treatment and the reduction of phosphorus in detergents.
WAT004 Bathing water quality (CSI 022/WAT 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/bathing-water-quality http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/bathing-water-quality/bathing-water-quality-assessment-published-4 Is bathing water quality improving?
  • The quality of water at designated bathing waters in Europe (coastal and inland) has improved significantly since 1990.
  • Compliance with mandatory values in EU coastal bathing waters increased from just below 80 % in 1990 to 93.1 % in 2011. Compliance with guide values likewise rose from over 68 % to 80.1 % in 2011. 
  • Compliance with mandatory values in EU inland bathing waters increased from over 52 % in 1990 to 89.9 % in 2011. Similarly, the rate of compliance with guide values moved from over 36 % in 1990 to 70.4 % in 2011.
WAT005 Urban waste water treatment (CSI 024/WAT 005) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/urban-waste-water-treatment http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/urban-waste-water-treatment/urban-waste-water-treatment-assessment-3 How effective are existing policies in reducing loading discharges of nutrients and organic matter?

Wastewater treatment in all parts of Europe has improved during the last 15-20 years. The percentage of the population connected to wastewater treatment in the Southern, South-Eastern and Eastern Europe has increased over the last ten years. Latest values of population connected to wastewater treatment in the Southern countries are comparable to the values of Central and Northern countries, whereas the values of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe are still relatively low compared to Central and Northern Europe.

WREI001 Emission intensity of agriculture in Europe (WREI 001) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/untitled-indemission-intensity-of-agriculture http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/untitled-indemission-intensity-of-agriculture/assessment Is the emission of nutrients from agricultural land to water decoupling from economic growth?

Nitrogen emission to water: Absolute decoupling of nitrogen emissions from GVA is observed in seven countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Lithuania, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia ). This means that these countries succeeded in economy growth while reducing emissions to water. As the area of agriculture land remained constant during the analyzed period, the decrease in emission can be attributed to decrease in specific gross nutrient balance per hectare.

Relative decoupling was observed in the Czech Republic, and Poland. This means that the resource efficiency has increased, however with higher absolute emissions.  Decreases in emissions coupled with a decrease in GVA occurred in 11 countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and the United Kingdom). In six out of those 11 countries, the rate of emission decrease was greater than the rate of the GVA decrease.


Phosphorus emission to water: Absolute decoupling of phosphorus emissions from the GVA is observed in five countries (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, and Slovenia). Decrease in emission coupled with decrease in GVA occurred in ten countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and the United Kingdom). In all these countries except Denmark, the rate of emission decrease was greater than the rate of the decrease of GVA.

The ranges of nutrient emission intensity of agriculture are quite wide and reflect varieties of agriculture practices across European countries.

Values of nitrogen emission intensity for 2008 range from 6,0 to 176 tons of total nitrogen per million EUR GVA per year. Significant decrease in nitrogen emission intensity between 2000 and 2008 was recorded in Bulgaria, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. In 2008 Bulgaria, Portugal and Romania reported (in Eurostat) the lowest values of the specific nitrogen balance per hectare. In creased emission intensity was observed in Denmark, Ireland and United Kingdom, however, this was due to a falling GVA not to emissions, which actually were reduced. Calculation of emission intensity based on GVA diminished by subsidies, which reflects better the actual economic performance from  agriculture, result in much higher emission intensities for countries, e.g.,  Norway, Finland , Lithuania and Poland with relatively high contributions from subsidies to the economy.. The increment in emission intensity associated with excluding subsidies is significant namely in Norway (106 t/mio EUR/y) and Finland (38,8 t/mio EUR/y).

The 2008 values for total phosphorus emission intensity range from 0,47 to 13,03 tons per million EUR GVA per year. Significant decrease in the phosphorus emission intensity (decrease by more than 50%) over the last decade was recorded in nine countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech republic, Germany, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Slovenia). Moreover, Austria, Germany, France, Luxembourg and Portugal, reported (Eurostat) the lowest values of the specific phosphorus balance per hectare comparable to the EU-27 average, being 1 kg of total phosphorus per hectare per year. The impact of subsidies on phosphorus emission intensity (based on 2008 data), was most significant in Norway and Finland, where the increment in emission intensity associated with excluding subsidies accounted for 16,24 and 3,49 t/mio EUR/y respectively , whereas the increment in remaining countries did not exceed 1 t/mio EUR/y.

Subsidies: The analysis of subsidies on the output of the agricultural industry for the studied years showed that 13 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Slovenia and the United Kingdom) reduced the proportion of subsidies in relation to the GVA of their agricultural sector between 2000 and 2008. On the other hand, 5 countries (Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia) increased this proportion during the same period. Information was incomplete for Bulgaria and Germany, where subsidy levels for years 2000 and 2008 respectively were reported as zero (Eurostat). Noteworthy is the sharp increase in the proportion of subsidies as part of GVA  (being in the range between 12-26 % of GVA) in new Member States like Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia accompanied by the increase of GVA values. And, on the other hand, the significant reductions in old Member States like Denmark, Luxembourg, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Given the multiple factors that affect both the change in sectoral GVA and in nutrient balance, it is complicated to draw direct relationships between these two variables. Some key descriptors which could aid in explaining the behavior of these are the structure of the sector (e.g. farm size, standard gross margins, crop type, stocking rate), the socioeconomic characteristics of the area (e.g. rural population, income and employment levels) and the policy measures in place (e.g. subsidies). However, it must be noted that the specific context of each country could result in varying combinations of the mentioned factors and their aggregate effects.

 

 

WREI002 Emission intensity of the domestic sector in Europe (WREI 002) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emission-intensity-of-domestic-sector http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emission-intensity-of-domestic-sector/assessment Is nutrient emission in water from the domestic sector decoupling from population growth?

Absolute decoupling of nutrient emissions from domestic sector and the population growth over the period of almost two decades (1990-2009) is observed in thirteen countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Finland, Ireland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia and Turkey). The actual extent of decoupling, and the differences in trends among countries, may be partially explained by different levels of numbers of inhabitants connected to tertiary wastewater treatment technologies

When making the EU wide comparison of the extend of decoupling of nutrient emissions from population growth, the actual rate of population connected to different types of treatment (elaborated in the CSI 024) should be taken into consideration, and completeness of the data available on population connected to collecting systems without treatment. The status of the implementation of the UWWTD which protects the water environment from the adverse effects of discharges of urban waste water, the level of investment in the water and wastewater management ,as well as the status of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and Groundwater Directive may have an impact.   Furthermore household patterns as well as the household income level  affecting the production and composition of waste water should be considered as well.

It is assumed that the use of actual data on loads discharged from wastewater treatment plants combined with the load values calculated for population not connected to the waste water treatment would add value to the decoupling indicator, as it would better reflect the real situation..

 

WREI003 Emission intensity of manufacturing industries in Europe (WREI 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emission-intensity-of-manufacturing-industries-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/emission-intensity-of-manufacturing-industries-1/assessment Is the emission to water of nutrients and heavy metals from manufacturing decoupling from economic growth?

The manufacturing industry in 11 countries (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain and Sweden) has achieved absolute decoupling of nutrient emissions from economic growth (GVA). A decrease in emissions coupled with a decrease in gross value added (GVA) occurred in the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Belgium and Finland. However, in all cases (except Finland), the rate of emissions decrease was greater than that of GVA. An increase in nutrient emissions, accompanying the growth in GVA, was observed in Slovakia and Poland.

These developments arise from different absolute levels of emissions intensities and depend on there being no major changes in data coverage - such as including more facilities in the most recent reporting year despite them already existing in the earliest reporting year - within the countries during the reporting period. It should be noted that, as some industrial emissions may vary considerably from year to year, the comparison of just two selected years might be subject to variations, and not be representative of a consistent trend.

The achievement of absolute decoupling of manufacturing industries' heavy metals emissions from economic growth (GVA) was observed again in 12 countries (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden). A decrease in emissions, coupled with a decrease in GVA occurred in the United Kingdom, Italy and Belgium. In all cases, the decrease in the rate of emissions was greater than that of GVA (relative decoupling). An increase in emissions, despite a drop in GVA, was observed in Finland and France. Finally, a growth in emissions accompanying economic growth occurred in the manufacturing industry in Hungary.

Given the multiple factors that affect both sectoral GVA and the pollution pressure originating from manufacturing, it is complicated to draw direct relationships between these two variables. Some key descriptors, which could aid in explaining this behaviour, are the structure of the sector (e.g. facility size distribution, production technology, relative proportion reported as E-PRTR releases), the socioeconomic characteristics (e.g. salary levels) of the area and the policy and/or economic measures in place (e.g. treatment requirements, pollution charges, taxes). However, it must be noted that the specific context of each country could result in varying combinations of the factors mentioned and their aggregate effects.

WST003 Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WST 003) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-electrical-and-electronic-equipment http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-electrical-and-electronic-equipment/assessment-1 Are we improving the collection and management of waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE)?

Data indicates that while reuse and recycling of the collected waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) seems to be on track in the majority of the EU and EFTA member countries, the collection of the WEEE has shown varying but generally improving results. It appears that the amounts of WEEE that are collected, are largely reused (either as a whole appliance or components) or recycled although there is still room for improvement in some countries. However, more attention should be given to the improvement of collection systems. The level of collection is still very low in many countries, especially when compared to the amount put on the market (Figure 1).

WST004 Waste generation (CSI 041/WST 004) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-generation-1 http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-generation-1/assessment Is the generation of waste in Europe declining?

European economic production and consumption have become less waste intensive, even after the economic downturn since 2008 is considered in the analysis.

From the production side, waste generation from manufacturing in the EU-28 and Norway declined by 25% in absolute terms between 2004 and 2012, despite an increase of 7% in sectoral economic output. Waste generation by the service sector declined by 23% in the same period, despite an increase of 13% in sectoral economic output.

Turning to consumption, total municipal waste generation in EEA countries declined by 2% between 2004 and 2012, despite a 7% increase in real household expenditure.

One of the objectives in EU waste policy is to reduce waste generation in absolute terms, within the overall goal to decouple economic growth from resource use and environmental impacts. Waste prevention efforts across Europe seems to contribute to the waste objectives; with considerable differences between the countries. Wider analysis across different economic sectors within and beyond EU borders will be needed in order to provide more comprehensive conclusions.