All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Preliminary data for the centre of the capital city, Riga, from 2004 to 2008 indicate that the mean annual concentration of PM10 exceeds the limit value for the protection of human health. Meanwhile, at urban and rural stations throughout Latvia limit values for human health protection were not exceeded (Figure 1).
Several of the recorded 24-hour PM10 values in Riga and Liepaja were also above the limit value (Figure 2).
Figure 1: Annual average PM10 concentrations (annual limit value is 40 μg/m3)
Source: Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre
Figure 2: Number of days on which the PM10 daily limit value for human health protection (50 μg/m3) was exceeded (limit may not be exceeded more than 35 times per calendar year).
Source: Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre
Latvia began measuring PM2.5 in 2008 in the Riga metropolitan area, at Milgravis and Brivibas Street stations and at other stations across Latvia (Ventspils and Liepaja).
Annual average limit values of nitrogen dioxide for human health protection in Latvia were only exceeded at one traffic station in Riga (Valdemara Street). During 2008, nitrogen dioxide concentrations reached the limit value (44 μg/m3) for the protection of human health (within the margin of tolerance) (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) annual average concentration (annual limit value is 40 μg/m3)
Source: Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre
Deposition from the atmosphere is a major indicator of precipitation, ambient air quality and ecosystem status. Between 2004 and 2008, there was no significant change in the total deposition of sulphur and nitrogen at Latvian rural background stations (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Total deposition (mg/m2 year) of sulphur (Stot) and nitrogen (Ntot) at the rural background stations Rucava and Zoseni
Source: Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre
The computed area at risk of eutrophication covers all ecosystems in Latvia, but the area at risk of acidification is 16 % of the total ecosystem area (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Damage to Latvian ecosystems as a result of acidification and eutrophication
Source: Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre
Figure 6: AOT40 index, rural background station Rucava
Source: Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre
Assessment of the impact of surface ozone on vegetation using the internationally-recognised AOT40 index shows that the critical level (6 000 µg/m3×h) was exceeded at the Rucava rural background station in 2006 and 2008 (Figure 6). In 2006, observations of visible ozone damage to white clover under the ICP Vegetation programme registered a medium degree of leaf damage (5–25 %). During the period 2004–2008, there was no exceedance of the target value (18 000 µg/m3×h) for the protection of vegetation[1]
[1] Air Quality Annual Report 2008 (in English and Latvian)
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2010/countries/lv/air-pollution-state-and-impacts-latvia or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 26 Apr 2024, 09:21 PM
The country assessments are the sole responsibility of the EEA member and cooperating countries supported by the EEA through guidance, translation and editing.
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others