Personal tools

Notifications
Get notifications on new reports and products. Frequency: 3-4 emails / month.
Subscriptions
Sign up to receive our reports (print and/or electronic) and quarterly e-newsletter.
Follow us
Twitter icon Twitter
Facebook icon Facebook
YouTube icon YouTube channel
RSS logo RSS Feeds
More

Write to us Write to us

For the public:


For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff
Contact the web team
FAQ

Call us Call us

Reception:

Phone: (+45) 33 36 71 00
Fax: (+45) 33 36 71 99


next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

You are here: Home / The European environment – state and outlook 2010 / Country assessments / Finland / Freshwater - Drivers and pressures (Finland)

Freshwater - Drivers and pressures (Finland)

Topics: ,
Freshwater - Drivers and Pressures
Published: 26 Nov 2010 Modified: 08 Apr 2011

 

Water quality is also affected by weather conditions and variations in runoff[1]. During 2000–2003, there were periods where the water quality clearly deteriorated. In 2002 most of the country suffered from the worst drought in several decades, which caused water levels to drop in many water bodies. During the winter of 2002–2003, extremely poor oxygen conditions were observed in about 450 small and shallow lakes, especially in southern and western Finland, and mass die-offs of fish occurred in many of these lakes. The main reasons for the severe oxygen problems were an early ice cover and the low water levels. Low water levels also contributed to the degradation of rivers, especially in south-western Finland.

 

The nutrient load and natural leaching[2]

Nutrients from diffuse and point sources cause the water quality to deteriorate. The share of the diffuse sources of the total anthropogenic load for phosphorus is about 80 % and for nitrogen about 60 %. The anthropogenic load is higher than the natural leaching for both nutrients. The deposition affects the water quality, too. The input of nutrients due to deposition and natural leaching was estimated to enable the comparison with the amount of nutrient inputs from different anthropogenic sources in 2008.

 

Table 2: The phosphorus and nitrogen loads from different sources and the estimates of deposition and natural leaching in Finland in 2008


WATER Table2

The comparison between the situation in 2008 and 2004 shows no significant changes. Many of the point source categories as well as the deposition show a slight decrease in the nutrient load. Agriculture is the largest source both in 2004 and in 2008 and the share of agriculture of the total load has slightly increased.

 

Table 3: Anthropogenic loads of nutrients in 2004 by source[3]

WATER Table3x

 

 

 

Figure 3: The shares of anthropogenic loads of nutrients in 2004 by source[4]

WATER Figure3

 


Even if the changes in the nutrient inputs have recently been small, some cases show significant decreases over a longer period of time. Especially emissions of phosphorus from industry and municipalities have had a clear decrease after 1980.

 

Figure 4: Development of nutrient emissions from point sources into water 1980 - 2007[5]


WATER Figure4

Nutrient balances in agriculture

The use of phosphorus in agriculture has decreased considerably during the last two decades[6]. In the late 1980s, the phosphorus balance was around 30 kg/ha and has decreased smoothly since then to the 5 kg/ha of today. There is a decrease of almost 70 % in the use of phosphorus fertilisers and the phosphorus content in manure has fallen by 15 %. However, no clear signs have been observed in the water bodies despite the decrease in the phosphorus balance. This is basically due to the earlier accumulation of phosphorus in the soil.

 

In Europe the highest values of phosphorus balance are 15-20 kg/ha (Belgium, the Netherlands). The balance in Finland is slightly lower than in Denmark and Norway but higher than in Sweden (1 kg/ha) and Ireland (7 kg/ha).

 

The nitrogen balance has had a similar development; from values slightly above 100 kg/ha to below 50 kg/ha which is the average European level[7]. The nitrogen content in the fertilizers has decreased by 20 % and the content in manure by 25 %. This decrease has not yet been visible in the water quality.

 

Urban wastewater treatment[8]

There were over 200 municipal wastewater treatment facilities in 2004. With a very few exceptions, the treatment facilities use the biological-chemical (i.e. tertiary) process. The total incoming loads of BOD7, phosphorus and nitrogen have steadily increased but the effect of the reduction processes has increased even more. The percentage of reduction, calculated as the ratio between the amount of reduction and the load of the influent, is about 95-96 % for BOD7 and phosphorus. For nitrogen, the improvement of the reduction process has been as clear but the percentage of reduction remains slightly below 50 %

 

Table 4: The incoming and remaining loads of (tonnes/year) and the percentage of reduction in the Finnish municipal wastewater treatment facilities 1971–2004

WATER Table4



Table 5: The incoming and remaining loads of phosphorus (tonnes/year) and the percentage of reduction in the Finnish municipal wastewater treatment facilities 1971–2004

WATER Table5



 

Table 6: The incoming and remaining loads of nitrogen (tonnes/year) and the percentage of reduction in the Finnish municipal wastewater treatment facilities 1971–2004

WATER Table6


 Wastewater treatment in rural areas[9]

The treatment of wastewater in rural areas with no centralised sewerage system will be improved greatly over the coming years, thanks to legislation in the Onsite Wastewater System Decree (542/2003), which came into force on 1 January 2004. The Decree sets minimum standards for wastewater treatment and the planning, construction, use and maintenance of treatment systems. The treatment facilities should in most cases meet the new requirements by 2014.



[1] Source: Water quality affected by diffuse loads. Ministry of the Environment

[2] Source: The nutrient load and natural leaching (in Finnish). Finnish Environmental Administration

[3] Nyroos et al. (eds.): Vesiensuojelun suuntaviivat vuoteen 2005 Taustaselvityksen lähtökohdat ja yhteenveto. Finnish Environment 55/2006. Finnish Environment Institute. p 24 (in Finnish)

[4] Nyroos et al. (eds.): Vesiensuojelun suuntaviivat vuoteen 2005 Taustaselvityksen lähtökohdat ja yhteenveto. Finnish Environment 55/2006. Finnish Environment Institute. p 24 (in Finnish)

[6] Source: Nutrient balance - phosphorus. MTT Agrifood Research Finland (in Finnish)

[7] Source: Nutrient balance - nitrogen. MTT Agrifood Research Finland (in Finnish)

[8] Source: Yhdyskuntien jätevesien puhdistus 2004 p 9-11 (in Finnish)

[9] Source: Wastewater treatment in rural areas. Finnish Environmental Administration

Geographical coverage

[+] Show Map

Document Actions
Disclaimer

The country assessments are the sole responsibility of the EEA member and cooperating countries supported by the EEA through guidance, translation and editing.

European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100