Household expenditure on consumption categories with differing environmental pressure intensities (SCP 013) - Assessment published Apr 2013
This item is open for comments. See the comments section below
Generic metadata
Tags:
Typology: Descriptive indicator (Type A – What is happening to the environment and to humans?)
- SCP 013
- Contents
-
Key policy question: Are Europeans switching consumption patterns to less intensive types of goods and services?
Key messages
Trends in household spending patterns from 1995 to 2010 are mixed but have shown some tendency towards an increasing share of consumption categories with lower environmental pressure intensities. Almost all consumption categories have also seen reductions in environmental pressure intensities. Together these two developments are likely to have had the effect of relatively decoupling environmental pressures from growth in household consumption expenditure.
Trends in share of expenditure on household consumption (COICOP) categories, EEA countries (excluding Lichtenstein and Turkey)
Note: Percentage distribution of household expenditure volumes across 12 COICOP categories for the years 1995 and 2010
- Household consumption (COICOP) - EUROSTAT provided by Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat)
Trends in absolute expenditure in household consumption (COICOP) categories per capita - EEA countries (excluding Lichtenstein and Turkey)
Note: Time series of indexed values (1995 = 100) of household expenditures on COICOP categories
- Household consumption (COICOP) - EUROSTAT provided by Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat)
Direct and indirect greenhouse gases (GHG) induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption categories, 2000-2007
Note: Trends in direct and indirect greenhouse gases (GHG) induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption (COICOP) categories, shown for 3 years 2000, 2004 and 2007
- NAMEA project EU-27 calculations provided by EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION (ETC/SCP)
Direct and indirect acidifying emissions induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption categories, 2000-2007
Note: Trends in direct and indirect acidifying emissions induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption (COICOP) categories, shown for 3 years 2000, 2004 and 2007
- NAMEA project EU-27 calculations provided by EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION (ETC/SCP)
Direct and indirect emissions of tropospheric ozone precursors induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption categories, 2000-2007
Note: Trends in direct and indirect tropospheric ozone precursor emissions induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption (COICOP) categories, shown for 3 years 2000, 2004 and 2007
- NAMEA project EU-27 calculations provided by EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION (ETC/SCP)
Direct material input induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption categories, 2000-2007
Note: Trends in DMI induced per Euro of expenditure in 12 household consumption (COICOP) categories, shown for 3 years 2000, 2004 and 2007
- NAMEA project EU-27 calculations provided by EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION (ETC/SCP)
Key assessment
Over the period assessed, two main relative decoupling effects can be identified from changes in household consumption expenditure categories. Firstly, a shift in consumption expenditure from categories with high environmental pressure intensities (pressures per Euro spent) to ones with lower intensities due to changes in consumption patterns. Secondly, a reduction in the environmental pressure intensities of individual consumption categories. While the policy question is mostly concerned with changes in consumption patterns, the indicator can also be used to illustrate the second effect.
Trends in consumption expenditure reveal a shift in consumption expenditure patterns to less intensive types of goods and services. The two most rapidly growing consumption categories (Figure 2), ‘communications’ and ‘recreation and culture’, which have increased their combined share of expenditure from 9% to 13%, are also two of the categories with lowest environmental pressure intensities (Figures 3-6).
Two further low-intensity categories, ‘health’ and ‘miscellaneous goods and services’ have also increased their share from 3% to 4% and 10% to12% of expenditure respectively. Moreover, spending on ‘food and non-alcoholic beverages’ which is one of the most pressure-intensive categories has stayed stable despite economic growth (Figure 2) and its share has reduced from 15% to 12% of total spending (Figure 1).
On the other hand expenditure on two other categories with higher than average intensities - transport and housing - has grown along with income. Their share of expenditure has remained relatively stable at 22% and 13-14% respectively between 1995 and 2010.
With the exception of ‘alcoholic beverages, tobacco and narcotics’ which has seen a very slight reduction, expenditure on all categories has remained stable or have increased between 1995 and 2010. Therefore, these overall changes in spending patterns are likely to only have had a relative not absolute decoupling effect on environmental impacts caused by consumption as pressures caused by consumption will have grown but less rapidly than overall consumption expenditure.
Figures 3-6 demonstrate that, almost without exception, all 12 consumption categories have seen reductions in environmental pressure intensities between 2000 and 2007. However, it should be noted that this could have been caused by improvements in the production processes of individual goods and services within each consumption category, but also by shifts in the products being purchased within each consumption category. For, example, a shift from use of private cars to trains will show up as a reduction in pressure intensity in the Transport COICOP category in Figures 3-6.
Data sources
-
Household consumption (COICOP) - EUROSTAT
provided by Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat)
More information about this indicator
See this indicator specification for more details.
Contacts and ownership
EEA Contact Info
Almut ReichelOwnership
EEA Management Plan
2012 2.5.2 (note: EEA internal system)Dates
Permalinks
- Permalink to this version
- 64abe391-9d59-41b7-acc9-c5e2f504b50d
- Permalink to latest version
- M4UVS4KTAC
Document Actions
Share with others