Personal tools

Notifications
Get notifications on new reports and products. Frequency: 3-4 emails / month.
Subscriptions
Sign up to receive our reports (print and/or electronic) and quarterly e-newsletter.
Follow us
Twitter icon Twitter
Facebook icon Facebook
YouTube icon YouTube channel
RSS logo RSS Feeds
More

Write to us Write to us

For the public:


For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff
Contact the web team
FAQ

Call us Call us

Reception:

Phone: (+45) 33 36 71 00
Fax: (+45) 33 36 71 99


next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

You are here: Home / Data and maps / Indicators / Proximity of transport infrastructure to designated areas

Proximity of transport infrastructure to designated areas

This content has been archived on 06 Nov 2013, reason: Content not regularly updated
Topics: , ,

This indicator is no longer being regularly updated

Assessment made on  01 Jan 2002

Generic metadata

Classification

Transport Transport (Primary theme)

Biodiversity Biodiversity

DPSIR: Pressure

Identification

Indicator codes
  • TERM 007
Geographical coverage:

[+] Show Map

Contents
 

Policy issue:  Preserve biodiversity and protect designated nature areas

Key messages

  • Extension of infrastructure networks is increasing pressures on designated nature areas.

Figures

Key assessment

The designation of areas for nature protection is one of the longest-established and most common measures for the protection of biodiversity. The EU birds and habitats directives aim at protecting more than 10 % of the territory of the EU by 2010. In the EU, 1 089 of the 1 650 areas designated under the EU birds directive up to 1997 have at least one major transport infrastructure within 5 km of their centres, as have 270 out of the 430 Ramsar wetlands (designated up to 1998). For the seven ACs for which data are available, 57 Ramsar sites are designated, of which 41 have a major transport infrastructure in close proximity, and this despite the fact that infrastructure density in those countries is still relatively low. In the EU, roads constitute the largest pressure on Ramsar sites, while in the ACs it is railways. The development of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T), and its extension to the east, risks aggravating further the conflicts between infrastructure development and nature conservation. A study by BirdLife International found that 85 important bird areas (IBAs), corresponding to 21 % of all IBAs investigated, would be potentially affected by the eastward extension of the TEN-T. Road developments pose the greatest risk (affecting 52 sites), but a surprisingly high number of sites (34) would be in close proximity to waterways (BirdLife International, 2001). Implementation of the directive on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment could in future help to avoid conflicts between transport infrastructure planning and nature conservation.

Download detailed information and factsheets

Permalinks

Permalink to this version
127614924fbe191cbaff8e24050af1bc
Permalink to latest version
VEC4VHN2CT
Document Actions

Comments

European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100