Personal tools

Sign up now!
Get notifications on new reports and products. Currently we have 56596 subscribers. Frequency: 3-4 emails / month.
Follow us
Twitter icon Twitter
Facebook icon Facebook
YouTube icon YouTube channel
RSS logo RSS Feeds
Notifications archive

Write to us Write to us

For the public:


For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff
Contact the web team
FAQ

Call us Call us

Reception:

Phone: (+45) 33 36 71 00
Fax: (+45) 33 36 71 99


next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

You are here: Home / Data and maps / Indicators / Municipal waste generation / Municipal waste generation (CSI 016/waste 001) - Assessment DRAFT created Jan 2013

Municipal waste generation (CSI 016/waste 001) - Assessment DRAFT created Jan 2013

Created : Oct 31, 2012 Published : Jan 11, 2013 Last modified : Jan 11, 2013 03:26 PM

Generic metadata

Topics:

Waste and material resources Waste and material resources (Primary topic)

Household consumption Household consumption

Green economy Green economy

Tags:
SOER2010 | CSI | CSI016 | municipal waste generation | households | waste001 | waste | economy
DPSIR: Pressure
Typology: Descriptive indicator (Type A – What is happening to the environment and to humans?)
Indicator codes
  • CSI 016
  • waste 001
Dynamic
Temporal coverage:
1995-2010
 
Contents
 

Key policy question: Waste prevention: are we reducing the generation of municipal waste?

Key messages

One of the most important objectives of the EU policy is to decouple waste generation from economic growth. Data shows that Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) generation in the EU-27 has been stabilising since 2000 albeit at a high level of around 520 kg/capita. However, MSW generation went down to 513 kg/capita in 2010, probably an effect of the economic downturn starting in 2008.

 

Municipal waste generation per capita in Europe

Note: Municipal waste generation per capita in Western Europe (EU-15 + Norway, Iceland and Switzerland), New Member States (EU-12), EU countries (EU-27), Turkey, Western Balkan countries and total in Europe (total)

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Municipal waste generation per capita

Note: Municipal waste generation per capita in Western Europe (EU-15), New Member States (EU-12), EU countries (EU-27) and total in Europe (EU-27 + Turkey, Croatia, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland)

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Key assessment

The recent EU policy instruments and strategies, such as the Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) and the 6th Environmental Action Programme (EAP) prioritise waste prevention and decoupling of waste generation from economic growth and environmental impacts. In the European Union, a relative decoupling from economic growth has already been achieved since the stabilization of MSW generation trend after 2000 which does not follow the simultaneous increase in the GDP. Contrary to the EU, municipal waste generation in the West Balkan region has been steadily increasing since 2003, going up to 378 kg/cap on average in 2010, exceeding the average 352 kg/capita in the EU-12. Waste generation has closely followed the region’s upward trend in GDP, attributed to the rapid economic expansion provoked by the adoption of free market economies in the countries of the region.

Municipal waste generation rates in the EU-12, Turkey and the West Balkan countries are on average lower than in EU-15 and EFTA countries. In the EU-12 average generation appears to have remained relatively stable since the mid-nineties (although trends in individual countries are quite variable). This apparent stability in average generation has occurred during a period with strong economic growth as well as growth of consumption expenditure in the EU-12 Member States. 

The stabilisation of waste generation in the EU might have a number of explanations. The causes of absolute decoupling in municipal waste generation per capita in EU-12 are not fully clear yet. Several countries of the region have reported that apparent decoupling in their MSW generation may partially be caused by changes in measurement methods. Weighing of waste deliveries at landfills has been gradually introduced in some EU-12 countries over the past decade. Previously the amounts were estimated according to volume. Since amounts of lightweight waste (e.g. packaging) are growing and amounts of heavy fractions (e.g. ash and slag) are decreasing, individual landfills might have overestimated weight of municipal waste in the previous years based on older waste composition data. Another reason is the initiatives taken by some countries (mostly in EU-15) in the field of waste prevention. The actions are still limited, but some signs of effective prevention can already be observed.

Other trends, such as those in consumption patterns and waste collection methods (e.g. limited collection of bulky waste), might also have played a role. Reporting systems need further development, especially regarding the definition of municipal/non-municipal waste in some streams e.g. waste from small enterprises and services, bulky waste and packaging waste.

Furthermore, there are notable differences among countries both in the trend of waste generation and its size. In the EU-27, the annual generation per capita varies from 304 kg in Latvia up to 760 kg in Cyprus in 2010. Some of the differences are due to different methodologies in data collection, reducing comparability of data. For example some countries do not include household packaging waste in the reported data on municipal solid waste. On the other hand, some countries have achieved a stabilisation of waste generation or even a reduction (e.g. Ireland, Sweden, UK) while others follow a constant increase (e.g. Portugal, Cyprus). Therefore, there is a lot of room for improvement if the successful policies and measures applied in some countries become widespread across Europe.

Data sources

More information about this indicator

See this indicator specification for more details.

Contacts and ownership

EEA Contact Info

Jasmina Bogdanovic

Ownership

EEA Management Plan

2012 2.5.3 (note: EEA internal system)

Dates

First draft created: 2012/10/31 14:01:25.997805 GMT+1
Publish date: 2013-01-11T16:26:45+02:00
Last modified: 2013/01/11 15:26:45.090036 GMT+1
Hubert Reisinger
Hubert Reisinger says:
Jan 25, 2013 09:21 AM

I am not sure if the definition of municipal waste is sufficient. Should there be a mass threshold for waste from commerce (such as not more than 10 tonnes per shop per year). Missing seems to be waste which is directly collected by the municipality itself, such as waste from streets and street borders or waste from street-markets.

Hubert Reisinger
Hubert Reisinger says:
Jan 25, 2013 09:21 AM

I am not sure if the definition of municipal waste is sufficient. Should there be a mass threshold for waste from commerce (such as not more than 10 tonnes per shop per year). Missing seems to be waste which is directly collected by the municipality itself, such as waste from streets and street borders or waste from street-markets.

Xavier Ghewy
Xavier Ghewy says:
Feb 05, 2013 09:33 AM

In key assessment last summary, differences are also due to the coverage degree of private sector in the management of municpal waste.

Xavier Ghewy
Xavier Ghewy says:
Feb 05, 2013 09:33 AM

In key assessment last summary, differences are also due to the coverage degree of private sector in the management of municpal waste.

Jonathan Derham
Jonathan Derham says:
Feb 12, 2013 02:08 PM

If the Municipal Waste Indicator is to become truly useful therre has to be an EU wide acceptance of the definition of MSW. In Ireland municipal waste includs housing waste, waste from commercial and industrial enterprises that is compatible and managed in the same manner (i.e. was from offices and factory canteens, general waste from shops, hospitality sector, street cleaning & litter, household WEEE, etc). It does not include municipal treatment plant or municipal drinking water sludges, nor waste from municipal healthcare buildings except for canteen and office type waste. If we are not compairing like with like across Europe then policy action will be inefficient and potentially ineffective. In Ireland we have established an extract from the EWC that we believe reporesents MSW with a high degree of confidence. It must be possible to develop such a list to harmonise the understanding of MSW across the union.

Hubert Reisinger
Hubert Reisinger says:
Feb 15, 2013 01:34 PM

Eionet review of indicators on waste
Comments on Indicator on Municipal waste generation (CSI 016/waste 001)
• Austrian data in Fig. 2: Municipal waste generation per capita
End of 2012, the calculation of Austrian municipal waste data has been revised due to a clarification of Eurostat concerning some definitions. In this process of re-calculation also the data regarding the generation of municipal waste have partly been revised and corrected. The new data, which will also be submitted to Eurostat, are:
Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
in 1,000 t* 5.017,00 5.071,70 5.292,50 4.951,10 4.996,90 4.921,00 4.677,80
*As I do not have the official data about population, I have not calculated the generation per capita.
• Key assessment
In the first sentence you mention the priority of “decoupling of waste generation from economic growth and environmental impacts”. I suggest rephrasing the sentence to ““decoupling of waste generation and its environmental impacts from economic growth”.
• Justification for indicator selection
In the second paragraph it is stated that “data coverage for other wastes, for example total waste or household waste, is more limited” than data on municipal waste. Household waste is the most important fraction of municipal waste. Therefore, data on household waste should be well known, when calculating municipal waste. In my opinion, household waste should either be deleted in this connection or replaced by a better example for limited data, e.g. construction & demolition waste.

European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100