Personal tools

Notifications
Get notifications on new reports and products. Frequency: 3-4 emails / month.
Subscriptions
Sign up to receive our reports (print and/or electronic) and quarterly e-newsletter.
Follow us
Twitter icon Twitter
Facebook icon Facebook
YouTube icon YouTube channel
RSS logo RSS Feeds
More

Write to us Write to us

For the public:


For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff
Contact the web team
FAQ

Call us Call us

Reception:

Phone: (+45) 33 36 71 00
Fax: (+45) 33 36 71 99


next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

You are here: Home / Data and maps / Indicators / Expenditure on remediation of contaminated sites

Expenditure on remediation of contaminated sites

Topics: ,

Assessment made on  01 Nov 2002

Generic metadata

Classification

Soil Soil (Primary theme)

Tags:
csi
DPSIR: Response

Identification

Indicator codes
Geographical coverage:

[+] Show Map

Contents
 

Policy issue:  How much is being spent on cleaning up soil contamination?

Key messages

  • Although the "polluter pays" principle is generally applied, a huge sum of public money has to be provided to fund necessary remediation activities, which is a common factor across Europe. However, annual expenditures vary from 35 to under EUR 2 per capita in the various countries. Even though considerable amount of money has been spent on remediation activities already, the share compared to the total estimated remediation costs is relatively low (8 % maximum).

Figures

Key assessment

Data show that:

  • considerable sums of (public and private) money have to be provided to comply with existing environmental standards;
  • the priority given to the management of contaminated sites is different in each country (assuming that the problems are more or less the same);
  • annual remediation expenditures in the various countries have almost been constant in the years 1999?2000;
  • on average, annual expenditure for the remediation of contaminated sites amongst the countries surveyed is approx. 0.8 ? of their GDP;
  • annual expenditures are on average about 2.5 % of the estimated total remediation costs (data from six countries); with a maximum of 7.9 % of the total in Denmark.

In general, all countries apply the "polluter pays" principle to different extents. The "polluter pays" principle cannot fully be applied to historic pollution since many legally responsible entities have disappeared or the polluter cannot be identified or because of insolvency of the polluter. Therefore, a considerable share of the total remediation costs has to be provided by public funds. Estimations on public expenditure are readily available, however, information on private expenditure is scarce and depends on rough estimations.

There is a more than a hundred-fold difference in annual remediation expenditures (public and private) per capita amongst the reporting countries (see Figure 1). These differences reflect not just the varying degrees of awareness, but also the different environmental standards applied in each country, the different hydrological conditions and degree of industrialisation.

Remediation costs are on average 10 times higher than site investigations costs.

Links between environmental merit and invested budgets are highly dependent on national standards, in terms of remediation targets and local site conditions.

Download detailed information and factsheets

Permalinks

Permalink to this version
0a228fedfee14c08f42695f972ac8e0a
Permalink to latest version
KJPUEEI9TF
Document Actions
Filed under:

Comments

European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100