Gap between average annual emissions in 2008 and Kyoto targets with and without the use of flexible mechanisms and carbon sinks

This website has limited functionality with javascript off. Please make sure javascript is enabled in your browser.

Created : Oct 14, 2010 Published : Oct 14, 2010 Last modified : Nov 29, 2012 11:41 AM

Topics: Climate change ,

This is the latest published version. .

See older versions.

Jan 29, 2010 - Projected gaps between emissions and Kyoto units in Europe

http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/projected-gaps-between-emissions-and-kyoto-units-in-europe-1/figure-7-5-ghg-trends-and-projections-2009.eps/image_original

Download

European data

Microsoft Excel spreadsheet
70.00 KB

Figure 3-7.xls

Metadata

Last upload:

14 Oct 2010

Dynamic

Temporal coverage:

2008-2012

Tags:

Kyoto | greenhouse gas | GHG2010 | projection

Geographical coverage:

[+] Show Map

Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

Rights:

EEA standard re-use policy: unless otherwise indicated, re-use of content on the EEA website for commercial or non-commercial purposes is permitted free of charge, provided that the source is acknowledged (http://www.eea.europa.eu/legal/copyright). Copyright holder: European Environment Agency (EEA).

Owners:

European Environment Agency (EEA)

Permalink to this version: 9af4969bc19408fa50ddf8516434f146
Permalink to latest version: T55B0RADPB

Figure type:

Graph

Additional information

A positive value indicates a country for which emissions in 2008 were lower than the annual target.
The assessment is based on emissions for year 2008 and the effect of allocation to the EU ETS in 2008, the planned use of flexible mechanisms as well as the expected effect of LULUCF activities.
The gap for 'EU-15' is assessed by considering the sum of the gaps of the 15 EU Member States which are part of the burden-sharing agreement. Since Member States with a surplus can use any remaining allowances for their own purposes and not necessarily transfer them via the flexible mechanisms to compensate for Member States with a shortfall, a gap is also calculated for 'EU-15 (no overachievement)', where only shortfalls are considered, but not any surplus.