Briefing
- Note: new versions of the publication are available!
Eionet core data flows 2016
Eionet core data flows 2016
Go to latest version
Key messages
- Belgium, Poland and the United Kingdom shared this year’s top data flow score of 98 % (Figure 1). A reporting performance of 100 % would indicate timely and high quality data deliveries across all covered data flows.
- In addition, the following nine countries managed to achieve a final score at or above 90 %: Finland, Germany, Latvia, Portugal, Slovenia, Croatia, France, Ireland and Slovakia.
- The overall progress across all core data flows is given as the median value of country scores. This value is now at 85 %, both for the 28 EU countries and the 33 EEA member countries (Table 1). One of the performance indicators in the EEA’s Multi-Annual Work Programme 2014-2018 is to achieve an average data flow score of at least 90 % by the end of 2018. Reaching this target within the given time frame continues to be an ambitious challenge.
The annual evaluation of deliveries under the Eionet core data flows is a continuation of the earlier reporting on Eionet priority data flows, for which annual reports have been published by the EEA since 2005. The scoring of countries’ reporting performance on the basis of key data flows is considered to be an important driver contributing to improved reporting countries. The annual process conducted by the EEA and Eionet is an evaluation of data deliveries at the technical level, which is performed independently of other data flow monitoring activities that may exist, e.g. those carried out by the European Commission for compliance reasons.
Figure 1. Overall data reporting performance of countries in 2016
Source: Eionet core data flows 2016
Table 1. History of data reporting performance
Country | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
Albania | 30 | 45 | 21 | 19 | 31 | 53 | 47 | 36 | 56 | 45 | 21 | |
Austria | 98 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 98 | 83 | 96 | 96 | 83 | |
Belgium | 66 | 69 | 75 | 96 | 92 | 90 | 94 | 92 | 90 | 93 | 98 | |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22 | 53 | 46 | 58 | 56 | 50 | 53 | 42 | 31 | 10 | 15 | |
Bulgaria | 89 | 80 | 92 | 96 | 92 | 92 | 94 | 92 | 96 | 96 | 73 | |
Croatia | 17 | 48 | 71 | 69 | 78 | 92 | 89 | 92 | 95 | 88 | 90 | |
Cyprus | 25 | 63 | 81 | 90 | 90 | 73 | 88 | 83 | 71 | 79 | 70 | |
Czech Republic | 65 | 68 | 84 | 80 | 85 | 85 | 82 | 84 | 84 | 92 | 65 | |
Denmark | 69 | 63 | 78 | 73 | 94 | 92 | 96 | 92 | 90 | 71 | 85 | |
Estonia | 81 | 90 | 86 | 96 | 96 | 98 | 98 | 94 | 98 | 96 | 88 | |
Finland | 75 | 73 | 78 | 92 | 85 | 83 | 83 | 90 | 92 | 89 | 95 | |
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | 69 | 78 | 75 | 75 | 72 | 69 | 69 | 66 | 81 | 81 | 79 | |
France | 83 | 85 | 89 | 94 | 96 | 96 | 94 | 96 | 88 | 86 | 90 | |
Germany | 75 | 92 | 78 | 88 | 100 | 98 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 96 | 95 | |
Greece | 54 | 50 | 50 | 52 | 58 | 58 | 65 | 69 | 67 | 61 | 60 | |
Hungary | 80 | 86 | 78 | 66 | 45 | 41 | 65 | 65 | 60 | 75 | 68 | |
Iceland | 56 | 30 | 64 | 73 | 64 | 75 | 80 | 70 | 70 | 50 | 81 | |
Ireland | 73 | 73 | 81 | 94 | 92 | 90 | 92 | 94 | 98 | 96 | 90 | |
Italy | 59 | 50 | 64 | 67 | 54 | 60 | 62 | 63 | 77 | 68 | 65 | |
Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 57 | 66 | 61 | 56 | 46 | |
Latvia | 98 | 100 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 96 | 85 | 94 | 94 | 86 | 93 | |
Liechtenstein | 64 | 54 | 60 | 57 | 86 | 82 | 97 | 66 | 34 | 45 | 25 | |
Lithuania | 83 | 94 | 94 | 85 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 94 | 90 | 86 | 73 | |
Luxembourg | 39 | 44 | 34 | 58 | 53 | 63 | 84 | 89 | 80 | 96 | 63 | |
Malta | 63 | 68 | 69 | 86 | 52 | 34 | 46 | 77 | 69 | 64 | 45 | |
Montenegro | 36 | 56 | 0 | 17 | 6 | 44 | 53 | 50 | 56 | 30 | 46 | |
Netherlands | 77 | 79 | 81 | 60 | 77 | 88 | 96 | 88 | 90 | 93 | 85 | |
Norway | 65 | 78 | 93 | 80 | 85 | 90 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 92 | 88 | |
Poland | 58 | 77 | 69 | 79 | 81 | 79 | 88 | 92 | 87 | 89 | 98 | |
Portugal | 27 | 42 | 64 | 83 | 85 | 90 | 85 | 77 | 85 | 82 | 93 | |
Romania | 11 | 75 | 86 | 96 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 90 | 87 | 82 | 70 | |
Serbia | 36 | 56 | 60 | 78 | 75 | 75 | 72 | 78 | 78 | 90 | 72 | |
Slovakia | 85 | 95 | 97 | 91 | 98 | 82 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 96 | 90 | |
Slovenia | 75 | 96 | 94 | 96 | 94 | 96 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 89 | 93 | |
Spain | 52 | 56 | 64 | 63 | 83 | 85 | 90 | 92 | 92 | 96 | 85 | |
Sweden | 94 | 96 | 97 | 100 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 96 | 96 | 80 | |
Switzerland | 75 | 39 | 85 | 100 | 97 | 94 | 100 | 83 | 94 | 95 | 86 | |
Turkey | 19 | 17 | 25 | 47 | 64 | 64 | 72 | 64 | 69 | 35 | 57 | |
United Kingdom | 82 | 83 | 94 | 65 | 81 | 98 | 96 | 96 | 94 | 89 | 98 | |
Median EU-28 | 74 | 76 | 81 | 87 | 91 | 90 | 92 | 92 | 90 | 89 | 85 | |
Median EEA-33 | 69 | 73 | 81 | 85 | 86 | 90 | 92 | 90 | 90 | 89 | 85 | |
Median EEA-39 | 66 | 71 | 78 | 80 | 85 | 87 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 88 | 81 |
Source: Eionet core data flows 2016
Table 1 shows the countries’ reporting performance (in %) since 2005. A score of 100 % indicates timely and high quality data deliveries across all covered data flows. For each data flow, a score of 0-4 points is given according to the timeliness and quality of the delivered data. The scores from all data flows are summed for each country and expressed as a percentage of the maximum achievable score. More details on the scoring and the rules applied are available from the Eionet website.
In 2015, no evaluation of deliveries was made because the review of core data flows was being made. Although this review lead to changes in the list of evaluated data flows, the results for 2016 are largely comparable with those from earlier years, as overall evaluation principles have not been changed.
Background to Eionet core data flows
Eionet data flow monitoring and progress reporting began in 1999 with an initial geographical coverage of the original 18 EEA member countries and a thematic scope of nine priority data flows. Since then, the list of data flows has expanded to 13 and the number of countries has grown to 39, as all 33 EEA member countries as well as the six cooperating Western Balkan countries are now covered by the data flow reporting.
During 2015, a review of data flow reporting was done in response to a need to realign the existing set of data flows with EEA priorities, i.e. the needs deriving from the EEA’s Multi-Annual Work Programme (MAWP) 2014-2018. During the review process, the following definition was established: “Eionet core data flows: a subset of existing key data flows reported by EEA member and cooperating countries agreed by the Management Board using the Reportnet tools and which are used by the EEA for its main assessments, products and services”.
In November 2015, a set of 18 Eionet core data flows that provides a better reflection of the importance of data flows for the EEA’s assessment activities was adopted by the EEA Management Board. This briefing summarises the first evaluation of core data flows, covering an initial subset of 10 core data flows in the following areas:
Air quality
- AQ IPR/E1a: information on primary validated assessment data
- AQ IPR/E2a: information on primary up-to-date assessment data
Air emissions
Biodiversity
Climate change mitigation
Industrial pollution
Water
Identifiers
Briefing no. 09/2017
Title: Releases to the environment from Europe's industrial sector
PDF TH-AM-17-011--EN-N - ISBN 978-92-9213-891-2 - ISSN 2467-3196 - doi:10.2800/901387
HTML TH-AM-17-011--EN-Q - ISBN 978-92-9213-890-5 - ISSN 2467-3196 - doi:10.2800/63987
Permalinks
- Permalink to this version
- dca20b8bb2204f21bf31e4c80c56a5b8
- Permalink to latest version
- 2NW1F3DK04
Geographic coverage
Temporal coverage
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eionet-core-data-flows-2016/eionet-core-data-flows-2016 or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 06 Feb 2023, 02:41 PM
Document Actions
Share with others