next
previous
items

Indicator Assessment

Exceedances of air quality limit values due to traffic

Indicator Assessment
Prod-ID: IND-106-en
  Also known as: TERM 004
Published 22 Nov 2018 Last modified 11 May 2021
10 min read
This is an old version, kept for reference only.

Go to latest version
Topics:
This page was archived on 10 Feb 2021 with reason: Other (Discontinued indicator)
    • The annual EU limit value for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) — one of the main air quality pollutants of concern, which is typically associated with vehicle emissions — was widely exceeded across Europe in 2016. Some 88 % of these exceedances occurred at roadside monitoring locations. 
    • The EU limit values for the two categories of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) were also widely exceeded. For PM2.5, approximately the same percentage of exceedances were recorded at traffic stations and at background stations. For PM10, exceedances were recorded at a greater percentage of background stations than at traffic stations. This indicates the importance of other emission sources for these pollutants, such as commercial and institutional buildings, household heating, etc.
This indicator is discontinued. No more assessments will be produced.

Annual mean NO2 concentrations observed at traffic stations, 2016

Note: The figure shows the annual mean concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) observed at traffic stations in 2016.

Data source:

Annual mean NO2 concentrations observed at background stations, 2016

Note: The figure shows the annual mean concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) observed at background stations in 2016.

Data source:

90.4 percentile of daily mean PM10 concentrations observed at traffic stations, 2016

Note: The map shows the 90.4 percentile of daily mean PM10 concentrations at traffic stations. This represents the 36th highest value in a complete series. It is related to the PM10 daily limit value, which allows 35 exceedances of the 50 µg/m3 threshold over a 1-year period. Dots in the last two colour categories indicate stations with concentrations above this daily limit value. Only stations for which more than 75 % of data are valid have been included in the map.

Data source:

90.4 percentile of daily mean PM10 concentrations observed at background stations, 2016

Note: The map shows the 90.4 percentile of daily mean PM10 concentrations at background stations. This represents the 36th highest value in a complete series. It is related to the PM10 daily limit value, which allows 35 exceedances of the 50 μg/m3 threshold over a 1-year period. Dots in the last two colour categories indicate stations with exceedances of this daily limit value. Only stations for which more than 75 % of data are valid have been included in the map.

Data source:

Annual mean PM2.5 concentrations observed at traffic stations, 2016

Note: The figure shows the annual mean concentrations of particulate matter (PM2.5) observed at traffic stations in 2016.

Data source:

Annual mean PM2.5 concentrations observed at background stations, 2016

Note: The figure shows the annual mean concentrations of particulate matter (PM2.5) observed at background stations in 2016.

Data source:

Figures 1 to 6 show the air quality situation in 2016 at monitoring stations across Europe for three main pollutants related to road transport, i.e. NO2, PM10 and PM2.5. For each pollutant, measurements taken at two different types of location are shown. The first map shows traffic air quality monitoring stations, which are located in close proximity to major roads and affected predominantly by traffic sources. The second map shows background stations, which are located away from dominant single sources, so that the pollution levels recorded are representative of the average exposure of the general population.

For NO2, most of the exceedances (88 %) of the 40 µg/m3 annual limit value, were recorded at traffic stations (Figure 1). Of the 936 traffic stations considered, 311 (33 %) reported concentrations above the annual limit value. The situation for background concentrations is quite different (Figure 2): of the 1 765 stations shown, only 39 (2 %) recorded concentrations above the annual limit value. These are mainly located in big cities such as Ankara, Barcelona, Istanbul, London, Madrid, Milan and Rome, and in smaller cities such as Ordu or Varna.

These results are consistent with the observations that road transport is the main emitting source of nitrogen oxides (EEA, 2018a), of which NO2 is a component, and that emission reductions from road transport have been lower than originally anticipated over the last two decades. The latter is because, among other things, growth in diesel vehicles has been higher than expected and 'real-world' emissions of NO— particularly from diesel passenger cars and vans — generally exceed the permitted European emission (Euro) standards (EEA, 2018b).

For PM10, the situation is different. Around one fifth of all reporting stations show values above the daily limit value of 50 µg/m3. Figure 3 illustrates that, of a total of 734 traffic stations, 121 (16 %) show concentrations above the daily limit value. Figure 4 shows that 381 (21 %) out of a total of 1 797 background stations exceeded the daily limit value. Nevertheless, in certain countries these exceedances are only seen at traffic sites, i.e. Cyprus, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden.

As highlighted in EEA (2018a), there are other major sectors responsible for primary PM10 emissions. These include the 'commercial, institutional and households', 'industrial processes and product use' and 'agriculture' sectors, which also influence the exceedances recorded by background stations.

Finally, for PM2.5, exceedances of the annual limit value of 25 µg/m3 seem also to be caused by sources other than traffic. Figure 5 shows that of 322 traffic stations, only 19 (6 %) reported concentrations above the annual limit value. Similarly, figure 6 shows that of 871 background stations, 45 (5 %) reported values above the annual limit value. Again, the 'commercial, institutional and households' sector is the main emitter of primary PM2.5 (EEA, 2018c), followed by 'road transport', whose emissions in 2016 decreased by 3 % compared with 2015 figures (EEA, 2018b), and 'industrial processes and product use'.

Supporting information

Indicator definition

This indicator compares concentrations of pollutants at background stations with those at traffic stations. This comparison provides an estimate of the increased levels of air pollution to which the population is exposed in areas with relatively high levels of road traffic. It also provides a measure of the impact of the technical and non-technical measures adopted to reduce the road transport sector's contribution to observed pollutant concentrations. 

The indicator makes use of official data submitted to the EEA’s Air Quality e-Reporting database.

Units

This indicator reports pollutant concentrations at traffic and background stations in micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3).


 

Policy context and targets

Context description

This indicator provides information relevant to current European air quality legislation related to the setting of national emissions targets, the reduction of transport-related emissions (discussed in detail in TERM003 (EEA, 2018b)) and the protection of human health from harmful air pollutant levels (EU, 2008). It is related to the World Health Organization's (WHO's) Air Quality Guidelines (WHO, 2000, 2006) for protecting public health.

Targets

EU ambient air quality limit values set by Directive 2008/50/EC for the protection of human health

  • A limit value for PM2.5 of 25 µg/m3 as an annual average; in force since 1 January 2015.
  • A limit value for PM10 of 50 µg/m3 as a daily average, not to be exceeded more than 35 times in a calendar year; in force since 1 January 2005.
  • An additional limit value for PM10 of 40 µg/m3 as an annual average; in force since 1 January 2005.
  • A limit value for NO2 of 200 µg/m3 as an hourly average, not to be exceeded more than 18 times in a calendar year; in force since 1 January 2010.
  • An additional limit value for NO2 of 40 µg/m3 as an annual average; in force since 1 January 2010.

WHO Air Quality Guidelines

  • Annual mean of PM2.5: 10 µg/m3.
  • Twenty-four-hour mean of PM2.5 (99th percentile of the annual daily series (3 days per year)): 25 µg/m3.
  • Annual mean of PM10: 20 µg/m3.
  • Twenty-four-hour mean of PM10 (99th percentile of the annual daily series (3 days per year)): 50 µg/m3.
  • Annual mean of NO2: 40 µg/m3.
  • One-hour mean of NO2: 200 µg/m3.

Related policy documents

  • Directive (EU) 2016/2284, reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants
    The directive is amending Directive 2003/35/EC (providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment) and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC. It entered into force at the end of 2016 and aims at compliance with the 2012 amended Gothenburg Protocol. In July 2017, the EU ratified the 2012 amendments to the 1999 protocol.
  • Directive 2008/50/EC, air quality
    Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe.
 

Methodology

Methodology for indicator calculation

Data submitted to the EEA's Air Quality e-Reporting database have been used. The selected stations include station types classified as 'traffic' for the traffic map and 'background' for the background map. Only stations for which at least 75 % of data per calendar year are valid are used. This means that, in the case of daily values, only those stations with more than 274 valid daily values per calendar year (or 275 days in a leap year) are used and, in the case of hourly values, only those stations with more than 6 570 valid hourly values per calendar year (or 6 588 hours in a leap year) are used.

Average yearly data were obtained for PM2.5 and NO2. For PM10, the annual series of daily values is ordered and percentile 90.41 (P90.41) selected. P90.41 represents, in a complete series, the 36th highest value; if it is above 50 µg/m3, it suggests an exceedance of the PM10 daily limit value. Using P90.41 diminishes the effect of the missing values. 

Methodology for gap filling

No gap filling is applied to the air quality data in the EEA air quality databases.

Methodology references

No methodology references available.

 

Uncertainties

Methodology uncertainty

No uncertainty has been specified.

Data sets uncertainty

Air quality data are officially submitted by national authorities. It is assumed that data have been validated by the national data suppliers. The number of reported stations varies across countries.

Station characteristics and representativeness are often insufficiently documented. Locally (i.e. at the station level), the indicator is subject to year-on-year variations due to meteorological variability.

Rationale uncertainty

No uncertainty has been specified.

Data sources

Other info

DPSIR: State
Typology: Descriptive indicator (Type A - What is happening to the environment and to humans?)
Indicator codes
  • TERM 004
Frequency of updates
This indicator is discontinued. No more assessments will be produced.
EEA Contact Info info@eea.europa.eu

Permalinks

Geographic coverage

Temporal coverage

Dates

Topics

Topics:

Tags

Filed under: pm10, transport, air pollution
Document Actions