All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Municipal waste increased in 2009 compared to previous years (Figure 1). This is evidence of the increasing consumer behaviour of the population which inevitably leads to more municipal waste. On the other hand, waste from the construction sector decreased during 2009 compared to previous years (Figure 2). Total waste is shown in Table 1.
Figure 1: Municipal solid waste 2005–09
Source: Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Telecommunication
Figure 2: Construction and demolition waste 2005–09
Source: Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Telecommunication
Table 1: Total generation of waste
Year |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Municipal waste |
571 218 |
622 400
|
633 599 |
722 729 |
722 731 |
762 353 |
857 223 |
Construction and demolition waste |
6 988 441 |
591 000 |
645 387 |
506 540 |
506 540 |
455 866 |
455 866 |
Total |
1 270 059 |
1 213 000 |
1 278 986 |
1 229 269 |
1 229 271 |
1 218 219 |
1 313 089
|
Source: Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Telecommunication
The composition of waste over the period September–December 2009, according to a study conducted by the project Implementation of National Plan for Approximation of Environmental Legislation (INPAEL), is given in Table 2 below.
Waste stream |
Average % in municipal waste stream
|
Weight within municipal waste of Albania/day (0.7 kg/person/day) |
Weight within municipal waste of Albania/year (266 kg/person/year) |
|
|
2 335 tonne/day |
852 360 tonne/year |
Organics |
47.36 |
1 106 |
403 690 |
Wood |
1.43 |
33 |
12 045 |
Paper |
5.37 |
125 |
45 625 |
Cardboard |
8.13 |
190 |
69 350 |
Total biodegradables |
62.3 |
1 454 |
530 710 |
|
|
|
|
LD plastics |
8.46 |
198 |
72 270 |
HD plastics |
4.75 |
111 |
40 515 |
Glass |
5.75 |
134 |
48 910 |
Textiles |
5.27 |
123 |
44 895 |
Metals — ferrous |
0.56 |
13 |
4 745 |
Metals — non-ferrous |
0.57 |
13 |
4 745 |
Healthcare waste |
0.17 |
4 |
1 460 |
Rubber |
0.2 |
5 |
1 825 |
Inert waste |
7.20 |
168 |
61 320 |
San-Pro waste |
3.25 |
76 |
27 740 |
WEEE |
0.31 |
7 |
2 555 |
Batteries |
0.02 |
1 |
365 |
Animal by-product waste |
1.08 |
25 |
9 125 |
Table 2: Composition of waste, September–December 2009
Source: INPAEL project
The waste management system is at a low level because of the weak collection systems in cities and almost no collection systems in rural areas. Private companies, financed by municipalities, clean the cities, and collect and transport waste to landfills. Albania has very few recycling/reusing systems for waste and few engineered landfills for the disposal of waste. The necessary stipulation for waste recycling is the separation of the waste at source; a request to organise and establish separate collection systems of waste from households has been made to local authorities (municipalities). This system will help in the separation of plastic, glass and metallic packaging, paperboard, unrefined aluminates, etc.
Most of the waste in rural areas is deposited in undefined places and especially in water courses where waste is then transported to other places. There is no system for the safe management of hazardous waste (neither domestic nor commercial). The main method for waste treatment is the construction of landfills although it should be noted that these landfills are not properly constructed and, thus, cause continuing pollution of the environment.
Hazardous waste generated by the industrial sector and municipal wastes are deposited together with urban waste. The biggest problem at landfills is uncontrolled fires, which release toxic gases (dioxin, furan) in populated areas, presenting a serious problem for human health. Also of concern are the polluted water sinks created at the landfills and not treated, which poses a great risk of polluting surface waters and groundwater.
Progress towards better waste management has been made in the construction of new landfills in some regions which comply with environmental standards. Further landfills are under development (Table 3).
Table 3: Waste landfills in Albania
No |
Landfill Site |
Surface area |
Capacity |
Notes |
1 |
Bestrova 1 (Vlore) |
12 ha |
1 044 690 m3 |
|
2 |
Bushat (Shkoder) |
12 ha |
1 000 000 m3 |
|
3 |
Bajkaj (Delvine) |
5 ha |
— |
Only a feasibility study has been carried out |
4 |
Sharre (Tirane) |
15 ha |
2 900 000 tonnes |
|
5 |
Korçe |
10 ha |
— |
Only a feasibility study has been carried out |
6 |
Rubik |
5 000 m2 |
3500 tonnes/year |
|
7 |
Peshkopi |
8 000 m2 |
— |
Only a feasibility study has been carried out |
Source: Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Telecommunication |
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2010/countries/al/waste-state-and-impacts-albania or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 28 Mar 2024, 10:25 AM
The country assessments are the sole responsibility of the EEA member and cooperating countries supported by the EEA through guidance, translation and editing.
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others