Personal tools

Notifications
Get notifications on new reports and products. Frequency: 3-4 emails / month.
Subscriptions
Sign up to receive our reports (print and/or electronic) and quarterly e-newsletter.
Follow us
Twitter icon Twitter
Facebook icon Facebook
YouTube icon YouTube channel
RSS logo RSS Feeds
More

Write to us Write to us

For the public:


For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff
Contact the web team
FAQ

Call us Call us

Reception:

Phone: (+45) 33 36 71 00
Fax: (+45) 33 36 71 99


next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

You are here: Home / Data and maps / Indicators / Hazardous substances in blue mussels in the north-east Atlantic.

Hazardous substances in blue mussels in the north-east Atlantic.

Topics: ,

Assessment made on  01 Jan 2001

Generic metadata

Classification

Coasts and seas Coasts and seas (Primary theme)

DPSIR: Pressure

Identification

Indicator codes
Geographical coverage:

[+] Show Map

Contents
 

Policy issue:  Have reductions in emissions led to a better environment for marine life?

Key messages

  • Concentrations in blue mussels in the north-east Atlantic of lindane, zinc and cadmium fell between 1990 and 1996, with levels in the first two reaching ecologically safe levels. No clear trends are yet apparent for mercury and lead, however, despite reductions in emissions of both.

Figures

Key assessment

The take-up by marine organisms of hazardous substances is estimated by monitoring their concentrations in the blue mussel. Mean concentrations of each substance are compared to reference values to produce an Ecological Reference Indicator (ERI), with an ERI under 1 indicating that the pollution levels are relatively safe for the species.

The studies present a mixed picture:

  • lindane levels dropped significantly, with the ERI falling steeply from 4.5 in 1990 to under 1 in 1993, where it has stayed since;
  • cadmium and zinc levels dropped much more slowly (although from a lower 1990 level than lindane). The cadmium ERI fell from just above 3 to around 2, while the zinc ERI fell from just above to just below 1;
  • lead concentrations remained stable, with an ERI hovering around 2, although there was a small decrease in the last two years;
  • mercury levels did drop slightly (from almost 4 to under 3) across the 1990-1996 period. However this disguises a sharp rise in the first few years.

It is as yet unclear why the reductions in emissions of all of these substances have not resulted in clearer falls in ERI values for lead and mercury. Part of the problem may in fact be the inherent nature of the monitoring system, as the number, sex and age of mussels collected from one year to the next cannot always be made consistent, and as there are uncertainties on the representativeness of the samples, on differences in bio-availability of the substances, on seasonable variability of the concentrations in mussels

Download detailed information and factsheets

Permalinks

Permalink to this version
a6aa05cd0c1e9e2924072513121b4ef2
Permalink to latest version
Q8IAUP0QCK
Document Actions

Comments

European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100