Personal tools

next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

You are here: Home / Data and maps / Indicators / Designated areas / Designated areas (CSI 008) - Assessment published Dec 2007

Designated areas (CSI 008) - Assessment published Dec 2007

Generic metadata

Topics:

Biodiversity Biodiversity (Primary topic)

Natural resources Natural resources

Policy instruments Policy instruments

Tags:
biodiversity | csi
DPSIR: Response
Typology: Descriptive indicator (Type A - What is happening to the environment and to humans?)
Indicator codes
  • CSI 008
Dynamic
Temporal coverage:
1895-2007
 
Contents
 

Key policy question: What measures are being taken to ensure the in situ conservation of biodiversity components?

Key messages

The designation of protected areas is a cornerstone for the conservation of biodiversity worldwide, from genes to species, habitats and ecosystems. In June 2006, the Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) re-affirmed the role of protected areas  as  cornerstones of biodiversity conservation, but also highlighted that many are "beset with managerial and financial difficulties that impede their effective management".

  • At the European level, there has been an increase in the total area of nationally-designated protected areas over time, indicating a positive commitment by European countries to biodiversity conservation. The total area of nationally designated sites in 37 European countries was more than 95.5 million hectares in 2005.
  • There has also been an increase in the total area of Natura 2000 sites over the past two years. This has been a result of ten new Member States joining the EU in 2004, as well the designation of new Natura 2000 sites in other Member States under the Birds and Habitats Directives.
  • The level of sufficiency in designating Natura 2000 sites for the Habitats Directive is high for most EU-25 countries (18 countries have sufficiency above 80%) and the new Member States are doing well. 

In addition to quantitative signals it is important to also keep in mind the crucial need to have a qualitative view on the efficiency of the network of designated areas.

  • Marine areas are not yet represented as Natura 2000 sites as the EU is still developing selection criteria.
  • There are increasing pressures on biodiversity outside of protected areas, and in the future, an assessment of the effectiveness of designated sites in protecting and conserving biodiversity will be needed.

Cumulated area of nationally designated areas over time in 37 European countries up to 2005

Note: Overlap may exist due to multiple designations for a same site but the overestimation can be masked by an "underestimation" of the inventory (some national datasets are not complete).

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Cumulative surface area of sites designated for EC birds directive over time (special protection areas - SPAs)

Note: The figure shows the cumulative surface area of sites designated for EC birds directive over time (special protection areas - SPAs)

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Cumulative surface area of sites designated for EC Habitats Directive over time (Sites of Community Importance - SCIs)

Note: The figure shows the cumulative surface area of sites designated for EC Habitats Directive over time (Sites of Community Importance - SCIs)

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Sufficiency Index (State of progress by Member States in reaching sufficiency for the Habitat Directive Annex I habitats and Annex II species)

Note: Bars show the degree to which Member States have proposed sites that are considered sufficient to protect the habitats and species mentioned in Habitats Directive Annex I and II (situation January 2007) (marine species and habitats are not considered).

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Share of designated areas per country following the categories: only under national designation, only under EU Birds Directive designation and both at national and EU Birds Directive designation

Note: The figure shows the share of designated areas per country following the categories: only under national designation, only under EU Birds Directive designation and both at national and EU Birds Directive designation

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Share of designated areas per country in the following categories: only under national designation, only under EU Habitats Directive designation and both at national and EU Habitats Directive designation

Note: The figure shows the share of designated areas per country in the following categories: only under national designation, only under EU Habitats Directive designation and both at national and EU Habitats Directive designation:

Data source:
Downloads and more info

Key assessment

Measures at Member State level - What areas are protected under national legislation?

Member States have national legislation that enables them to establish various types of protected areas. For nationally-designated protected areas, the total area protected in Europe continues to increase (Figure 1).

However, an increase in total area of protected sites may be correlated to increasing pressures on biodiversity outside those areas, for instance through growing urbanisation and transport infrastructures. Therefore, the expansion of protected areas and their role in protecting biodiversity has to be considered and assessed within the wider environment.

Measures at EU level

There was a steady increase in the cumulative area of the Natura 2000 network over the past two years. SCIs increased in coverage from 45 to more than 56 million hectares (Figure 2) and SPAs increased from approximately 29 million hectares to 45 million hectares (Figure 3). These increases are mainly due to the 10 new countries who joined the EU in 2004, but also due to new designations of protected areas by Member States particularly under the Birds Directive. The area designated by France increased significantly, by 170 % over the last two years. 

The percentage of terrestrial area covered by SCIs and SPAs per country indicates progress in establishing these areas and the European Commission publishes this in the 'EU Barometer'. As of December 2006, six Member States had designated more than 15 % of their territory as SCIs: Slovenia (31.4 %); Spain (22.6 %); Portugal (17.4 %); Greece (16.4 %); Estonia (15.9 %); and Hungary (15.0 %).

Are Natura 2000 objectives being met?

Progress in fulfilling the objectives of the Natura 2000 network will be assessed in two ways for the Habitats Directive:

  • the proposal and designation by EU Member States of sufficient Natura 2000 sites that are home to species and habitats of European concern; and
  • the extent to which the designation of such sites is effective in achieving favourable conservation status for those species and habitats.

The sufficiency index shows the progress of individual EU countries in proposing sites that contribute to the Habitats Directive. This is measured against a threshold that is considered sufficient to achieve a favourable conservation status for those species and habitats of concern (Figure 4). Comparison between countries is complicated by the heterogeneous distribution and abundance of species and habitats, and as a result some countries have a heavier burden than others in implementing the Directives (Figures 2 and 3).

Marine areas are not included in the sufficiency index, because the European Commission and Member States are still developing selection criteria for sites for the protection of marine habitats and species.

Contribution of Natura 2000 sites to total area under protection

The sites of the Natura 2000 network provide added-value to the existing national designations of Member States in the EU. The net contribution of the Natura 2000 network to in situ conservation is shown in Figures 5 and 6, indicating both the SPAs of the Birds Directive and in the SCIs of the Habitats Directive, respectively.

Specific policy question: What measures are being taken to conserve or restore biodiversity at the EU level and are they effective?

Specific assessment

Each country has its own policy and legislation for establishing protected areas at national level. The implementation of the Natura 2000 network has made full or partial use of these existing national instruments, when they fulfilled the criteria of the Habitats and Birds Directives. In many cases however, the implementation of the Natura 2000 has led to significant additional designations.

Although much slower than originally expected, the progress in proposing Natura 2000 sites has now accelerated and is good. For most countries, the sites they have proposed are considered nearly sufficient to achieve favourable conservation status for species and habitats covered by the Directive.

In January 2007, two Member States (Denmark and the Netherlands) had proposed sufficient sites. Four Member States (Belgium, Germany, Greece and Italy) have achieved more than 99 % sufficiency in proposing sites and six have more than 90% (Luxembourg, Spain, Malta, the United Kingdom, Sweden and France). Among the EU-10, five Member States have reached over 70 % sufficiency (Latvia, Hungary, Estonia, Slovenia and Slovakia) (Figure 3). Proposals of sites from Romania and Bulgaria, which only joined the EU in 2007, are still being assessed.

Whether or not the sites designated as national protected areas and Natura 2000 sites are effective in achieving favourable conservation status for species and habitats of concern - the second stage in assessing whether Natura 2000 objectives - needs to be critically assessed in the future.

Data sources

More information about this indicator

See this indicator specification for more details.

Contacts and ownership

EEA Contact Info

Katarzyna Biala

Ownership

EEA Management Plan

2010 (note: EEA internal system)

Dates

Document Actions
Filed under: ,

Comments

European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100