Write to us
Call us
Absolute differences between the observed and the predicted values of seff using the six global models for groups A to F
Created
: Sep 26, 2011
Published
: Sep 26, 2011
Last modified
: Nov 29, 2012 11:36 AM
Topics:
Land use
,
Map shows the differences between the level of fragmentation for FG-B2 calculated and the level of fragmentation predicted by 6-group-European model in the 28 countries investigated
This is the latest published version.
.
Metadata
Last upload:
Temporal coverage:
Tags:
Geographical coverage:
[+] Show Map
Methodology:
The objective of this task is calculate “effective mesh size” as indicator of landscape fragmentation. Effective mesh size (Meff) is proportional to the probability of two points chosen randomly in region being connected. This probability is then converted into the size of a patch – the effective mesh size. The unit of Meff is that of area (e.g. Ha). This area corresponds to the size of “meshes” of regular network that has the same degree of fragmentation and it can be compared with the values of Meff from other regions. The smaller the effective mesh size, the more fragmented the landscape.
Rights:
Owners:
Processors:
- Permalink to this version
- 80862f18ab2415fad04c6bad7b7975ff
- Permalink to latest version
- IYXNFWWHW3
Figure type:
Document Actions
Share with others