Data and maps

Write to us

For the public:

For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff

Contact the web team

FAQ

Effort split between ETS and non‑ETS emissions to achieve Kyoto compliance: Effort split between ETS and non‑ETS emissions to achieve Kyoto compliance
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
ETS and non-ETS emission trends in the EU‑15 compared to respective targets, 2008–2010: -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
EUA future prices 2005–2011: -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average 2008–2009 total GHG emissions and Kyoto targets (with and without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms): The assessment is based on average 2008–2009 emissions and the planned use of flexible mechanisms as well as the expected effect of LULUCF activities. For each country, the top bar represents the gap between domestic emissions and the Kyoto target, while the bar below includes the planned effect of Kyoto mechanisms and carbon sinks. A positive value indicates a country for which average 2008 and 2009 non-ETS emissions were lower than the annual target. Based on the actual Swiss emissions for 2008 and 2009 and projections for the remaining years of the first commitment period, the Swiss government decided on 10 June 2011 to increase its use of flexible mechanisms to meet the Kyoto target.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average 2008–2009 total GHG emissions and Kyoto targets (without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms): -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average 2008–2010 non‑ETS emissions and Kyoto targets (with and without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms): The gap refers to the average 2008–2009 non-ETS emissions because no approximated 2010 GHG emissions are available.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average 2008–2010 total GHG emissions and Kyoto targets (without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms): * 2008–2009 average emissions (no approximated 2010 GHG emissions available for Liechtenstein. Each bar represents the gap between domestic emissions and the Kyoto target. A positive value indicates that national total emissions were lower than the Kyoto target.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average annual emissions in 2008 and Kyoto targets with and without the use of flexible mechanisms and carbon sinks: Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gaps between 2006 emissions and Kyoto targets, relative to base-year emissions: Countries are sorted by regional grouping (EU-15, EU-12, other EEA countries and Croatia) and ranked by gap between their 2006 emissions and their Kyoto target (without use of Kyoto mechanisms).
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gaps between 2010 projections and Kyoto targets: Countries are sorted by regional grouping (EU-15, EU-12, other EEA countries and Croatia) and ranked by relative gap between 2010 projections (including additional measures, carbon sinks and Kyoto mechanisms) and Kyoto target
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs

« Previous 10 items Next 10 items » 1 2 3 4 5

Write to us

Call us

Sound and independent information
on the environment

Sections

Search results

Write to us

Call us

Sound and independent information on the environment

Sections

Search results

Sound and independent information
on the environment