You are here: Home / Data and maps
24 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type












































































New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
Indicator Assessment chemical/x-pdb Ecological status or potential (WFD 003) - Assessment DRAFT created Apr 2013
More than half of the surface water bodies in Europe are reported to be in less than good ecological status or potential, and will need mitigation and/or restoration measures to meet the WFD objective.  River water bodies and transitional waters are reported to have worse ecological status or potential than water bodies in lakes and coastal waters.
Located in Data and maps Indicators Ecological status or potential
Figure D source code Conservation status of river and lake habitat types and species, and conservation status of coastal and transitional waters habitat types of European interest
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Chemical status of transitional and coastal waters per RBD — percentage of water bodies not achieving good chemical status
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Percentage of transitional (a) and coastal (b) water bodies in poor and good chemical status, by count of water bodies
The graphs illustrate the chemical status of transitional and coastal water bodies as percentage of water bodies in poor and good chemical status, by count of water bodies.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Distribution of chemical status of groundwater, rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters.
Number of Member States contributing to the dataset: Groundwater (26); Rivers (25); Lakes (22); Transitional (15) and Coastal (20). Percentages shown for rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal are by water body count. Groundwater percentages, however, are expressed by area. The total number of water bodies is shown in parenthesis. Data from Sweden are excluded from surface water data illustrated in the figure. This is because Sweden contributed a disproportionately large amount of data and, classified all its surface waters as poor status since levels of mercury found within biota in both fresh and coastal waters exceed quality standards.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Ecological status/potential of and proportion of water bodies affected by pollution and hydromorphological pressures for transitional (left panel (a, b, c)) and coastal (right panel (d, e, f)) water bodies, by sea region
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Percentage of natural, heavily modified, artificial and unknown status for river, lake, transitional and coastal water bodies
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Percentage of natural, heavily modified, artificial and unknown status for river, lake, transitional and coastal water bodies
The graphs illustrate the designation of heavily and artificial water bodies
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Proportion of total number of classified water bodies with identified significant pressures (left column) and impacts (right column), for rivers, lakes, coastal waters, and transitional waters
The percentage is calculated against the total number of classified surface water bodies in Member States reporting the specific pressure or impact type (or any pressure or impact for the blue bars). The number of Member States included is indicated in brackets. See the indicator specification for more details.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Distribution of ecological status or potential of classified rivers, lakes, coastal and transitional waters
The figure shows percentage of the total number of classified water bodies (with total number given in brackets). See the indicator specification for more details
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100