Personal tools

next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

9 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type























































































New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
Figure Examples of the use of effective mesh density in monitoring systems of sustainable development, biodiversity, and landscape quality
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Predicted and observed values of effective mesh density according to the six predictive models for the six groups of regions studied in Europe
Effective mesh density values by NUTS-X region for Fragmentation Geometry FG-B2 in 2009. The NUTS-X regions represented by points above the diagonal line are more fragmented than predicted and those represented by by points below the diagonal line are less fragmented than predicted. All models shown include all available variables in each group and use a square root transformation for seff.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Predicted and observed values of effective mesh density according to the pan‑European predictive model
Effective mesh density values by NUTS-X region for Fragmentation Geometry FG-B2 in 2009. The NUTS-X regions represented by points above the diagonal line are more fragmented than predicted (e.g., FR107 Val de Marne) and those represented by by points below the diagonal line are less fragmented than predicted (e.g., CH04 Zurich).
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Absolute differences between the observed and the predicted values of seff according to the pan-European model
Map shows the differences between the level of fragmentation for FG-B2 calculated and the level of fragmentation predicted by the pan-European model in the 28 countries investigated
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Landscape fragmentation per capita (as the ratio of effective mesh density to
Map shows the level of fragmentation per capita for FG-B2 in the 28 countries investigated
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Bar diagram of effective mesh density values per NUTS-X region for FG-B2 in 2009
Effective mesh density values by NUTS-X region for Fragmentation Geometry FG-B2 in 2009. Fragmentation geometry has been created from input data (TeleAtlas roads/rails, CLC urban classes, mountain areas / mountain ridges based on Nordregio and WorldClim data and rivers/lakes based on Catchment Characterisation and Modelling (CCM) v.2 database and CLC database) and landscape fragmentation metrics (Jaeger 2000) has been calculated.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure model/mesh Bar diagram of effective mesh density values per country for FG-B2 in 2009
Effective mesh density values by country for Fragmentation Geometry FG-B2 in 2009. Fragmentation geometry has been created from input data (TeleAtlas roads/rails, CLC urban classes, mountain areas / mountain ridges based on Nordregio and WorldClim data and rivers/lakes based on Catchment Characterisation and Modelling (CCM) v.2 database and CLC database) and landscape fragmentation metrics (Jaeger 2000) has been calculated.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Economic density in the EU‑27 and in mountain areas
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Energy consumption for passenger transport versus density
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100