European Environment Agency's home page

Write to us

For the public:

For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff

Contact the web team

FAQ

Historic GHG trends and emission projections in EEA member countries which are not EU Member States, and Croatia, 1990–2030: 2011 information on GHG projections available from Norway and Switzerland. 2010 information available from Croatia, Liechtenstein and Iceland. 2007 information available from Turkey.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Non-ETS projections in the EU‑15 compared to different target scenarios: The average non‑ETS target corresponds to the average annual permissible in the sectors not covered by the EU ETS, calculated as the initial EU‑15 assigned amount minus the amount of allowances to be allocated under the EU ETS over the full commitment period. Permissible emissions can be calculated to take into account the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms, which will increase the EU‑15 assigned amount. Excluding the overdelivery projected by Member States results in lowering permissible emissions.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Trends and projections of EU‑15 total GHG emissions: -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
ETS and non-ETS emission trends in the EU‑15 compared to respective targets, 2008–2010: -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Actual progress of the EU‑15 towards its burden-sharing target in absolute and relative terms: The X-axis (0 % line) corresponds to the achievement of the EU-15 reduction target under the Kyoto Protocol (– 8 % compared to base-year emissions). Positive values correspond to contributions to the achievement of the EU-15 Kyoto target, while negative values represent shortfalls. The difference between target and GHG emissions concerns the sectors not covered by the EU ETS, which represent the right emissions and target to consider for the assessment of actual progress towards Kyoto targets.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average 2008–2009 total GHG emissions and Kyoto targets (with and without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms): The assessment is based on average 2008–2009 emissions and the planned use of flexible mechanisms as well as the expected effect of LULUCF activities. For each country, the top bar represents the gap between domestic emissions and the Kyoto target, while the bar below includes the planned effect of Kyoto mechanisms and carbon sinks. A positive value indicates a country for which average 2008 and 2009 non-ETS emissions were lower than the annual target. Based on the actual Swiss emissions for 2008 and 2009 and projections for the remaining years of the first commitment period, the Swiss government decided on 10 June 2011 to increase its use of flexible mechanisms to meet the Kyoto target.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Gap between average 2008–2009 total GHG emissions and Kyoto targets (without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms): -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs

Write to us

Call us

Sound and independent information
on the environment

Sections

Search results

Write to us

Call us

Sound and independent information on the environment

Sections

Search results

Sound and independent information
on the environment