European Environment Agency's home page

Write to us

For the public:

For media and journalists:

Contact EEA staff

Contact the web team

FAQ

Distribution of chemical status of groundwater, rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters.: Number of Member States contributing to the dataset: Groundwater (26); Rivers (25); Lakes (22); Transitional (15) and Coastal (20). Percentages shown for rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal are by water body count. Groundwater percentages, however, are expressed by area. The total number of water bodies is shown in parenthesis. Data from Sweden are excluded from surface water data illustrated in the figure. This is because Sweden contributed a disproportionately large amount of data and, classified all its surface waters as poor status since levels of mercury found within biota in both fresh and coastal waters exceed quality standards.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Proportion of classified groundwater bodies in different River Basin Districts in poor chemical status: The figure shows percentage of the total area of classified water bodies. See the indicator specification for more details
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Percentage of groundwater body area not achieving good chemical status due to nitrate (a) and total nitrogen input from organic and inorganic fertilisers (b): -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Chemical status of groundwater bodies: The graphs illustrate the chemical status of groundwater, Percentage of groundwater bodies in poor and good status, by area.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Chemical status of rivers and lakes: The graphs illustrate the chemical status of river and lake water bodies as percentage of water bodies in poor and good chemical status, by count of water bodies.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Chemical status of rivers and lakes per RBD — percentage of water bodies not achieving good chemical status: -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Trend in median total ammonium, total phosphorus and nitrate concentration of river water bodies, grouped by ecological status/potential class: Concentrations are expressed as a median of annual mean concentrations. Up to three-year gaps of missing values have been interpolated or extrapolated. Only complete series with no missing values after this interpolation/extrapolation are included. The number of time series/river stations is shown in parentheses. The trend for 1992 to 2010 for each of the ecological quality classes has been linearly extended to 2027 — or when the concentration level becomes negative.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Freshwater - State and impacts (Finland): Freshwater - State and Impacts
Located in The European environment – state and outlook 2010 › Country assessments › Finland
Percentage of transitional (a) and coastal (b) water bodies in poor and good chemical status, by count of water bodies: The graphs illustrate the chemical status of transitional and coastal water bodies as percentage of water bodies in poor and good chemical status, by count of water bodies.
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs
Chemical status of transitional and coastal waters per RBD — percentage of water bodies not achieving good chemical status: -
Located in Data and maps › Maps and graphs

Write to us

Call us

Sound and independent information
on the environment

Sections

Search results

Write to us

Call us

Sound and independent information on the environment

Sections

Search results

Sound and independent information
on the environment