Personal tools

next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

273 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type























































































New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
Figure D source code Projections of EU-15 and EU-27 emissions during the Kyoto commitment period
 
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Decomposition of current progress achieved by European countries towards their Kyoto targets by the end of 2010
A positive sign signifies a favourable contribution towards target achievement.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Publication End-user GHG emissions from energy
Reallocation of emissions from energy industries to end users 2005–2009
Located in Publications
Figure D source code Actual (2008 and 2009) and expected (2008–2012) average annual emissions and removals from LULUCF activities
A positive value indicates that the country has/expects net removals from LULUCF activities, taking into account the caps for forest management. It does not necessarily mean that the country intends to actually use RMUs to achieve its Kyoto commitment. The estimate of the actual effects of LULUCF activities might change in future years if better data becomes available.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Actual progress of the EU‑15 towards its burden-sharing target in absolute and relative terms
The X-axis (0 % line) corresponds to the achievement of the EU-15 reduction target under the Kyoto Protocol (– 8 % compared to base-year emissions). Positive values correspond to contributions to the achievement of the EU-15 Kyoto target, while negative values represent shortfalls. The difference between target and GHG emissions concerns the sectors not covered by the EU ETS, which represent the right emissions and target to consider for the assessment of actual progress towards Kyoto targets.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure D source code Difference between verified emissions and caps in all 30 countries participating in the EU ETS, 2008–2010
A positive sign indicates that verified emissions (2008, 2009, 2010 and 2008/2010 average) were higher than available allowances (i.e. the EU ETS helps the Member State to reach its Kyoto target). A negative sign indicates that verified emissions were lower than available allowances (i.e. the EU ETS does not help the Member State to reach its Kyoto target).
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure EUA future prices 2005–2011
-
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Policy scenarios compared to Baseline: GHG emissions, CO2 emissions and global temperature change, 2000-2050
The Outlook Baseline uses the UN forecast of population growth to 2050 and estimates that global economic growth will be 2.4% per year (expressed in terms of purchasing power parity or PPP) on average to 2050
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure EU 15 and EU-27 CO2 emissions from manufacturing industries and construction compared with value added and energy consumption
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure text/texmacs Gap between average 2008–2010 total GHG emissions and Kyoto targets (without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms)
* 2008–2009 average emissions (no approximated 2010 GHG emissions available for Liechtenstein. Each bar represents the gap between domestic emissions and the Kyoto target. A positive value indicates that national total emissions were lower than the Kyoto target.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100