Personal tools

next
previous
items

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sound and independent information
on the environment

140 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type























































































New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
Figure Gap between average non‑ETS 2008–2011 emissions and Kyoto targets without the use of carbon sinks and flexible mechanisms
A positive value indicates that average 2008-to-2011 emissions in the non‑ETS sectors were lower than the average annual target, taking into account the effect of allowances attributed to the EU ETS and without use of carbon sinks and Kyoto mechanisms.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Intended (2008–2012) and actual (2008–2011) average annual use of the Kyoto mechanisms
Positive values indicate net acquisition of Kyoto units, while negative values indicate net sales. The actual use of Kyoto mechanisms is based on the delivery of units according to the SEF table. Countries might have acquired more units than are recorded in the SEF tables, e.g. due to delivery dates later in the commitment period. For the United Kingdom, SEF tables include the overseas territories and the crown dependencies of the United Kingdom. For the purposes of the implementation of Article 4 of the KP and as they are not part of the EC, the overseas territories and the crown dependencies of the United Kingdom were excluded from the initial assigned amount of the United Kingdom under the EC. In consequence, the trade of AAUs is slightly overestimated for the United Kingdom, as SEF tables for the geographical coverage of the United Kingdom under the EC only are not available. For Denmark, Greenland is included in the SEF tables. For the purposes of the implementation of Article 4 of the KP and as Greenland is not part of the EC, Greenland was excluded from the initial assigned amount of Denmark under the EC. In consequence, the trade of AAUs is slightly overestimated for Denmark, as SEF tables for the geographical coverage of Denmark under the EC only are not available. For Germany and France, corrections for allocated allowances have been included. Germany distributed an additional 8.1 Mt in 2008 to finance its auctioning mechanism, and in 2009 and 2010, Germany received 4 Mt from operators due to back requirements that are not included in the CITL. Allocations by France to new entrants in 2008 and 2009 were not recorded as allocation in the CITL; these 9.4 Mt are included in the calculations of the report with exception of the Chapter 4 on the EU ETS.
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Relative gaps between EU Kyoto and burden sharing targets and projections for 2010 including existing and additional measures, use of Kyoto mechanisms (KM) and use of carbon sinks for EU Member States
This graph shows the projected effects of policies, measures, use of Kyoto mechanisms and carbon sinks by EU Member States on GHG emissions by 2010
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Greenhouse gas emissions per capita of EU-25 Member States for 1990 and 2004
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Past and projected EU-15 greenhouse gas emissions compared with Kyoto target for 2008-2012
2010 projections from Denmark and Luxembourg correspond to average projections for the whole 20082012 period
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Distance to target (Kyoto Protocol) for candidate and other EEA countries in 2002
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Greenhouse gas emission targets in Europe under the Kyoto Protocol (2008-2012) relative to base-year emissions
In Commission Decision 2006/944/EC determining the respective emission levels allocated to the Community and each of its Member States under the Kyoto Protocol, the respective emission levels were expressed in terms of tonnes of CO2-equivalent
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Actual and projected EU-15 greenhouse gas emissions compared with Kyoto target for 2008-12
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Gap between 2008 GHG emissions and Kyoto targets, not accounting for the effect of allocation of allowances to the EU ETS
 
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
Figure Effect of the difference between allocation to the EU ETS and verified emissions in 2008 on progress towards Kyoto targets
 
Located in Data and maps Maps and graphs
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Kongens Nytorv 6
1050 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Phone: +45 3336 7100